How useful are Marxist explanations of crime and deviance
Marxist explanations of crime and deviance are based on conflict and lie on the foundations on their belief that there is a class struggle in society between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marxists believe that law is part of the superstructure that is used to socialise people as the law’s definitions of deviance in general, reflect and serve ruling class interests. This maintains the ruling class’ power and coerces and controls the subject class. Therefore if members of society commit to these laws it is an aspect of ‘false class consciousness’, since these laws only benefit the ruling class. Marxists argue that social control of the population is maintained through threat and socialisation, and threat is the fall-back if socialisation fails. The result of this is a society in which the basic values guiding action support the capitalist political and economic system. The definition of what is criminal reflects the dominant social values. Chambliss (1976) suggests that capitalism encourages values such as greed and materialism which are conducive to all classes committing crime. Such values promote non-economic crimes such as violence and vandalism as inequalities in wealth and power lead to frustration and hostility for some members of the working class who may commit crime in an attempt to retrieve power and status. On the other hand, criticisms to this, point out that such a view is rather vague as the entireties of the working class are not revolt or criminal. Viewing all crime as a rebellion against the capitalist system ignores individual motivation and the fact that many people are law abiding and choose not to break the law. Marxist explanations of crime and deviance may also be criticised for concentrating exclusively on the social class dimension of crime and neglecting issues of gender and ethnicity. Snider (1993) argues that the effects of robberies and petty theft are much smaller...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document