Preview

How The effect of information asymmetry affects on business decisions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How The effect of information asymmetry affects on business decisions
Academic Writing in English for Graduate Students, Spring 2014
How The effect of information asymmetry affects on business decisions
Hee Jung Kang
Business Department, Korea University

Paying dividends to shareholders may benefit to some companies’ chief executive officers (CEO). It is because they receive stock options as an incentive for any dividends issuesincentives. The sShareholders of some firms vote on whether to pay dividends or to invest in valuable projects. A CEO may try to make encourage shareholders to vote to payfor dividends using information asymmetry. Information asymmetry means a situation where one party has more or superior information compared to another in a transaction. This harmful situation, in which one party’s lack of knowledge may lead to disadvantages of, often happens in business decisions. Some companies have tried for shareholders to limit access to financial information to pursue them shareholders to agree to pay for dividends rather than to spend money for on investing investment, especially in R&D business and growth options. Early studies have found that dividends have a significantly negative influence on investment (Peterson, 1983) due to information asymmetry, even if dividends should not affecthave no effect. This essay will summarize how information asymmetry affects business decisions in R&D investments and growth options.

First of all, in R&D investment, higher information asymmetry between CEO and shareholders can occur due to greater uncertainty on the future benefits relative to capital investment, leading to moral hazard problems (Chan, 2001). Executives may force shareholders to choose to pay dividends rather than to pursue valuable investment projects on limited internal funds. It is because having little financial information provided by CEO leads shareholders to make an invaluable sub-optimal business decisions. To receive funding from outside investors, firms may spend money for on conference events



References: Chan, L. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56, 2431–2456. Dhrymes, P. (1967). Investment, dividends and external finance behavior of firms. In Determinants of investment behavior. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Hall, B. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation.  Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V. Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review 46, 97–113. Peterson, P. (1983). A reexamination of the empirical relationship between investment and financing decisions. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 18 (4), 439–453. Smith, C. W. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32,  263–292.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2) The terms “irrelevance,” and “dividend preference, or bird-in-the-hand,” and “tax effects” have been used to describe three major theories regarding the way dividend payout…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cash Flow and Company

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages

    References: Ehrhardt, Michael C. and Eugene F. Brigham, Corporate Finance: A Focused Approach, 4th ed., New York Southwestern, 2011.…

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    505 Quiz 1

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miller, M. and Modigiliani, F. (1961), Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Dividend omissions are strategically motivated to preserve financial flexibility within the firm and violations of company covenants, as dividend cuts occur frequently even among healthy firms and are not necessarily indicator of financial distress (Bulan, 2009). Brockman & Unlu (2009) point out that countries with weaker creditor rights, firms adopt more restrictive payout policies in order to mitigate the agency cost of…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Billabong International Ltd

    • 9818 Words
    • 40 Pages

    • Ross, S., Westerfield, R. & Jaffe, J. 2010, Corporate Finance, 9th ed. New York , USA: MacGraw Hill/Irwin…

    • 9818 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2010). Corporate Finance (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 4477 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Pay

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It would be highly important for shareholders to connect closely as is possible to management and the available information about employee performance, and the compensation for that performance. I would recommend encouraging executives to make business decisions that will benefit shareholders’ by offering incentives for meeting performance goals. For instance, offering stock options as an incentive could discourage top-level management from keeping profits or bonuses acquired from sell of company…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    assesment

    • 3853 Words
    • 16 Pages

    ..... Click the link for more information., 1961, "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares", Journal of Business 34, 411-433.…

    • 3853 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F. 1961. Dividend Policy Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business 34 (October): 411–33.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murphy asserts that pay for CEOs is indicative of their level of performance as long as pay is based upon stock performance. Thus Murphy believes that CEOs should be rewarded for actions that benefit shareholders and punished for actions that harm shareholders. Murphy provides evidence that annual increases in salary for CEOs are positively correlated with the rate of return on stock. In response to the criticism that rewarding CEOs for current stock performance focuses on short term profit rather than on the long term Murphy argues that current stock market performance is an appropriate measure of long term potential. Therefore current stock performance is an appropriate basis for CEO compensation. Murphy also argues that other incentives for the CEO have even closer ties to company performance than salary. For example, stock options restricted stock, and long term performance plans are determined directly by company performance.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Southwest

    • 10222 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Stephen A. Ross, Randolph W. Westerfield, Jeffrey Jaffe. Corporate Finance 9e. New York : McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010.…

    • 10222 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Pecking & Trade Off Theory

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Analyse the pecking order and the trade-off theories of capital structure and assess the extent to which these are supported by the empirical evidence.…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [31] Lev B. and Sougiannis T. The capitalization, amortization, and value relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1996, (21):107~38.…

    • 6631 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics