The colonists were in every right waging war and breaking away from the British. Not only was this justified but it was about time that they stood up for themselves and actually took action against the British. For instance, the colonist had no say in any governmental matters when it came to the British. They had every right to come apart and take over their own government. Moreover, they were being taxed an absurd amount of money for everything they did. Furthermore, why should the colonists be forced to pay for a war that they didn't even fight? It was time to take control. Additionally, Britain’s policy of salutary neglect, or a healthy ignoring of the colonies, gave them the chance of gaining more independence in their trade practices which made them want to become completely sovereign. Lastly, in the social aspect there was a separation of 3,000 miles between Great Britain and America, which led to a sense of self sufficiently and independence in the colonist.
Document 2 supports the idea that the colonies were vindicated in breaking away from Britain. The policy of mercantilism, the belief that colonies were established for the benefit of the mother country, played a major role in the colonies endeavor for freedom. The excerpts from, Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, by John Dickinson found in document 2 object the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 requiring a tax stamp on printed material, from newspapers to wills. In 1767 Parliament passed the Townshend Acts which taxed imports. Document 2 reveals the opposition of internal taxes, where producing revenue is the only objective. Dickinson specifically opposed those acts but there were many more influencing a revolution. Such as the Navigation Acts which forced colonists to trade with Britain and its possessions. Parliament imposed customs duties, or tariffs, to enforce the regulations. This act along with the Sugar Act caused smuggling among the colonies, importing...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document