Preview

How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?
How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?

The New Economic Policy, or NEP, introduced by the Bolshevik government in 1921, was an attempt to readjust and realign the Soviet economy and to prevent its implosion. The basic concept of the new policy was that the appropriation of food from the peasants, as pioneered in the infamous ‘War Communism’, was to be abolished and replaced by a ‘tax in kind’. Peasants were then left in undisturbed possession of the land, free to sell their produce in the market. The policy ran from 1921 until 1928 and generated a great deal of controversy, both at the time and from historians since. A common argument levelled at the policy was that it was unsuccessful in attaining what it was trying to achieve and should not have been adopted by the Bolshevik Government.

In order to assess whether the NEP was in fact successful, it is necessary first to examine the situation prior to its adoption. Many have argued that the New Economic Policy was adopted as a result of the failures of War Communism; the government had experienced great difficulty in feeding the urban population and the peasants soon discovered that war communism entailed the forcible confiscation of their grain to feed the cities. This idea angered many of the peasants, who were left starving while their food was exported to feed those people living in the cities. By the autumn of 1920 it was clear that Bolshevik Russia was in ruins; industrial output was minimal, railway rolling stock was dilapidated and economic life rested on a primitive system of barter. It was obvious, therefore, that some form of economic reform was necessary.

The event which actually sparked off the introduction of NEP occurred in March 1921 in Kronstadt. A group of sailors caused a revolt by demanding an end to the special position of the Bolshevik party, a relaxation of economic controls and the restoration of freedom of speech for all. The uprising was quickly suppressed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) To what extent was the New Economic Policy (NEP) essential to the Bolshevik consolidation of power?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you agree with the view that Conservative economic policy was a success in the years 1979-1983?…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NEP, abbreviation for the ‘New Economic Policy’, was a number of policies deployed by Vladimir Lenin to improve the conditions of post war USSR. The NEP replaced the system of War Communism which was used between 1918 and 1921. The main motive for the War Communism policy was to support and supply the Red Army with food and weapons during the Russian Civil War. However, after the war the country was in turmoil and the majority of the Soviet Union’s population suffered hardship and poverty. This was when a quick solution was needed to revamp the Russian economy and the NEP policies were the solution. The NEP was made to balance the needs of the well of and the poor. The NEP allowed small business to prosper and make money which seemed popular to the peasants. It had also created more stability within the country in the economical sector but all these successes did not last.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He fuelled a period of massive industrialisation which ultimately lead to the emergence of a new social group; the urban proletariat. This group, who had little status in Russian society in the period 1854-1894, now played a major role in Russia, meaning a change in an average workers status. By 1914, there were 2.9 million workers employed in Russia working in 24,900 factories. However, this period comes with a degree of continuity in the level of status of workers; in 1910 only half of Russia’s national productivity was industrial. This points in the general direction that, as with the reigns of Alexander the II and III, the peasants were the social class with more power. The provisional government of February 1917 marked a change for the status of workers in Russia. It was formed with the Petrograd soviet, a council of workers and soldiers. They controlled the railway, postal and telegraph services; a level of status in which workers had previously never held. During Lenin’s rule, there were varying degrees of workers status: ‘While the peasantry suffered between 1918 and 1921, the urban workers became better off…The NEP clearly benefited the peasantry at the expense of urban workers’1. This quote from Lee can be challenged, as during war communism 1918 the populations of Moscow dropped by half. This shows that workers…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Depression was when America went through a downfall and the stock market crashed severely. Two long term causes were that many businesses were closed down, causing many to be unemployed. Millions of people also lost their savings due to bank failures, after banks have given loans without receiving money back. President Herbert Hoover was elected in 1928, shortly before the Depression occurred. Hoover believed in rugged individualism and voluntary help from the community, without the government to force anything, the Depression was prolonged as citizens were not able to work together. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected after running against Hoover in 1932, he won by a landslide. Roosevelt then initiated the New Deal, a plan to revive America with many different programs. Many will argue that the New Deal was a failure, however the New Deal was a successful plan and got America out of the Depression.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Deal was an economic plan developed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, based on Keynesian Economics that was geared towards pulling the nation out of the Great Depression. Although it did not achieve its main goal, it steered the nation in the right direction so that it finally ended in 1943 when unemployment rates reached pre-Depression rates. However, many critics argue that the New Deal was not effective at all in ending the Great Depression because it caused an even greater debt after FDR left office. This may be true, but this is the main point of Keynesian economics by using deficit spending to increase aggregate demand, and in turn stimulating the economy. The New Deal “provided regulation for a modern financial economy, establishing the Securities and Exchange Commission, passing the Glass-Steagall rectrictions on banks, and creating deposit insurance. It established federal unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, and of course social security. It enabled unions to organize…eventually, it created the Bretton Woods framework for international trade and investment” (Jeff Madriek).…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years of the depression were a few of the worst years in American history. Multiple people attempted to revive the economy, but ended up worsening the conditions. When FDR took office in 1933, many people were hopeful for what his presidency was going to bring, but opinions varied. Some believed that Roosevelt failed to extend his reforms of the new deal far enough to impact the society, but others believed he did just enough to make a difference without taking advantage of the power given to him through the federal government. Although it is controversial whether President Roosevelt’s New Deal was effective, most of his reforms benefited the American people and the economy.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, FDR’s purpose was to create employment, and many think he did; but…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economy was centralized: small-scale industry and services were nationalized, managers strove to fulfill Gosplan's output quotas, and the trade unions were converted into mechanisms for increasing worker productivity. But because Stalin insisted on unrealistic production targets, serious problems soon arose. With the greatest share of investment put into heavy industry, widespread shortages of consumer goods occurred, and inflation grew. Also during the 1930’s, there were reports of false articles about Communism.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1933 to 1939, Roosevelt responded to the problems of the Great Depression with the best approach he could possibly think of to preserve America. His proposition of a New Deal was partially successful; the New Deal was designed to grant loans, reduce unemployment, and it was ultimately created to help the economy. Roosevelt focused on the three Rs: Relief, Recovery, and Reform. That is, Relief for the unemployed and poor individuals and families; Recovery of the economy by providing funds to businesses to return to normal levels; and Reform of the financial system to prevent a future depression.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Second World War was more successful that the New Deal in ending the depression” - How far do you agree with this statement?…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin himself justified his policy of rapid industrialisation and collectivisation at the 1926 Party Congress as one that sought to achieve ' the transformation of our country from an agrarian to an industrial one, capable by its own efforts of producing the necessary means of production.' This socialist notion of economic autarky, although admirable and unifying in its intentions, would indeed inevitably bring about damaging effects for the people of Russia. But how intensive and extensive was this damage - and was damage the only significant effect for the Russian people?…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays