Preview

How Far Were Ideological Factors Responsible for Stalin’s Decision to Replace the Nep with the Collectivisation of Agriculture and the Five Year Plans?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Were Ideological Factors Responsible for Stalin’s Decision to Replace the Nep with the Collectivisation of Agriculture and the Five Year Plans?
How far were ideological factors responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans?
I believe that ideological factor were responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as Stalin was disgruntled by the peasants work ethic and continuingly wanted to become more communist and ideological issues were the main contributors that, if changed would make a vast difference to Russia. However, other factors also could have been responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans such as political and economical aspects. I feel that the main contributor in determining Stalin’s decision was the economic factors that Stalin was determined to industrialise Russia and under the NEP this was not possible.
Ideological factors were responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as the introduction of these new things meant that Russia could become more communist which was what Stalin ultimately wanted. Before collectivisation was introduced, Stalin felt that peasant attitude lacked revolutionary spirit, rather than producing grain for the good of the community the peasants produced it for themselves and their own profit. This was viewed as capitalism and was against what Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Russia tried to achieve and the NEP was helping the peasants develop capitalism. This is true in that of the introduction of collectivisation and the Five Year Plans and Stalin constantly wanted to become a ‘more communist’ state. Through collectivisation Stalin promised significant increase in production which would allow the government to sell more overseas, providing more resources for industrialisation and a higher standard of living for urban workers. Collectivisation had a devastating effect on the Russian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (a) To what extent was the New Economic Policy (NEP) essential to the Bolshevik consolidation of power?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NEP, having links and similarities between Capitalist and Communist ideas, were opposed by the Communists between the Bolsheviks themselves. This was because they believed the NEP wasn’t totally Communist policy which aggravated some members of the Communist party. They were also worried that a conflict of interest would cause splits between the parties would only be inflicting damage to themselves. Many Bolsheviks resigned mainly because the NEP was a massive withdrawal from the previous policy which was based on pure Communist ideology. The NEP gave the peasants more freedom by allowing them to gain their own profits through their private ownership.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was the process by which Russian agriculture was reformed, small farm were merged into larger units, in hope of production becoming more efficient and increasing its output. Stalin was aware of the increasing possibility of a war with Germany and so self-efficiency in food production became more imminently important in order to survive a war against the western powers. From 1927-1929 harvests fell, simultaneously affecting the wider economy. The government needed to sell grain abroad so they could receive the foreign currency necessary for resources needed for industrialisation. Collectivisation was therefore introduced to increase efficiency and introduce mechanisation. This added urgency to a need to increase output meant that high targets were set which were met with incentives and also punishments, pushing the economy towards its maximum potential making the essential contribution to the transformation of the Russian economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, in 1924, Stalin wanted to keep the NEP going, even though it went against Marxism as the NEP meant that a mixed economy in which there were features of capitalism. The main reason Stalin did this was because it was a measure brought in by Lenin, and at the time, Stalin wished to make himself seem as loyal to Lenin as possible, to appear to be the natural heir.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following his succession to power in 1924, Stalin promised the Russian people that he would carry on Lenin's legacy, which meant continuing with Lenin's policies and also his aim to establish communism throughout the Soviet Union and the rest of the world. However, comparing their strategies, one finds that Stalin moved away from Lenin's ideals, War Communism and his New Economic Policies (NEP).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first five year plan was installed in 1928 and lasted till 1933, the aim was to create an industrial base for further development, Stalin wanted to achieve rapid expansion of coal and steel production, electrical power and transport. Stalin had a huge benchmark for the peasants, which could be seen as Stalin’s main downfall in the plans. He called for at least 20% per annual increase and with his brutal force he was going to make sure that the increase would happen.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin’s NEP and Stalin’s Five Year plans were similar in that they both were devised in attempt to better the economy in Russia, they both were based on the benefit from agriculture since Russia had a lot of farms, they both were supposed to better the lives of the people, and they relied on the peasant. They were different in that the NEP was a form of capitalism in which private property was allow, that the peasants had a reasonable quota to meet and could sell their surplus themselves, small business were successful, and it increased the standard of living of the peasants and works. The Five Year plans took away private property, began collectivization of farm, set unreasonably high quotas that were impossible to meet, decreased the standard of living of peasants, resulted in strikes and revolts of farmers, and industrialized Russia. The one that was more successful was the NEP because the economy prospered and reached pre- World War I levels. There was success for the small business and since peasants could sell their surplus, not as many people were starving. Unlike under Stalin’s Five Year plans, there was not much of a shortage of food for the people. The standard of living for the workers were higher under the NEP. The societal costs to achieve quotas under Stalin were that it made the standard of living for the workers worse since the unrealistic quotas were set that the peasants could not meet. There was food shortages and Stalin did not care enough to do something about. Even when his wife brought to up to him, he completely ignored it. Peasants opposed the collectivization and burned their crops as a response. In the Ukraine, as a result of the quotas, there was a man-made famine in 1932 to 1933. Millions of people dies under the 5 Year plans. Additionally, workers could only buy 60 percent of what they did in 1913 because consumption had to be decreased in order to pay for…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NEP was an economic policy brought in by Lenin as a temporary solution to the USSR’s financial problems which was causing famines and massive unemployment at the time. As NEP was only considered a temporary solution by Lenin, Stalin was able to support NEP whilst it was working and when it started to fail as a solution he wanted to get rid of it. This helped him to remove some rival candidates as it wasn’t going against Lenin, and the other candidates that continued to support NEP weren’t going with Lenin’s ideas as he would have removed it once it had stopped working.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was Stalin's answer to his belief that Russia's agriculture was in a terrible state. Stalin believed that Russia had to be able to feed itself - hence collectivisation - and that at the very least the peasant farmers should be providing food for the workers in the factories if the Five Year Plans were going to succeed. There was barely any mechanisation, the use of scientific measures was minimal and peasant farmers produced usually for themselves and the local area. This was not good enough for Stalin.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Stalin believed that Russia was one hundred years behind the west. He devised his Five Year Plan to bring Russia up to speed with the rest of the world. This plan included many of Trotsky's ideas, which Stalin had previously opposed. We can relate this to the building of the windmill in Animal Farm and how Napoleon was against the idea until after the expulsion of Snowball. Russia's economy was centralized on agriculture with over twenty five million farms. Unfortunately, the majority of these barely produced enough to feed the families of those who worked them. Farmers who had a surplus of produce were called kulaks. Stalin decided he would "liquidate the kulaks as a class" under collective agriculture. He believed that once the population of "those just…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • To modernize agriculture, Stalin encourage Soviet farmers to combine their small family farms into huge collective farms owned and run by the state. • The state takeover of farming was completed within a few years, but with terrible consequences.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Stalin gained power in Russia, his opposition grew within the Communist party. Initially Stalin was a mediator, between the two main factions, in the debate about when to replace the New Economic Policy, and what to replace it with. The left of the party, Trotsky, and his supporters, wanted the New Economic Policy to be replaced, as soon as possible with a centrally planned economy, and for all farms to be collectivized. The right of the party, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin, wanted to maintain the New Economic Policy, and a gradualist approach to collectivization.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The nature of Stalin's economic policies and their impact on the people of Russia is a widely debated topic. It's also a difficult topic on which to focus an enquiry, complicated as it is by the reluctance of the Soviets to release all relevant documents, and the political views of those interpreting to documents, driven as many were by their own agendas. However, the documents that have been selected for this enquiry have been chosen for the light they shed on the problem and in the expectation that they will enable a conclusion, however provisional, to be drawn.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s personal and political gains were one of the greatest successes for the Communist Party that came from collectivisation. For a start, the idea of collectivisation was in direct opposition to his, now, rivals on the right in Bukharin, Tomsky and Ryhkov. Stalin adopted the idea of rapid industrialisation and getting there by force (the ideas of the left, of whom he just defeated) and in 1928 attacked the right wing. The right had a strong defence but in the Party Congress of 1929, Stalin came out on top and absolutely crushed Bukharin’s NEP and also, removing him, Ryhkov and Tomsky from the Politburo making sure they were no longer a threat. Furthermore, by 1930, over 60% of the farms were collectivised and in the elimination of the Kulaks, the Communist Party were on their way to becoming a true socialist state. However, the work effort by the peasantry on the whole was very small and this can be seen by the private areas of land given to the peasants, because there was a higher percentage of products grown on the small private plots of land compared to the big areas of collectivised farms. This in turn shows the overall positive outcome collectivisation had for Stalin and the political aspects.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, in communist Russia Stalin had taken the reigns of the Bolshevik party, having exiled Trotsky completely from Russia. Stalin set in place the first five-year plan, with GOSPLAN, the national planning agency in control of everything. He abolished the NEP and banned small industry, while rapidly trying to collectivize farms, believing they would be far more efficient as larger industrially run machines. He encouraged many peasants to move to the cities and become involved in the industrial revolution taking part. Stakhanovism became a prominent ideology, and in the footsteps of great achiever Stakhanov, many men tried very hard to beat quotas to receive raises, better housing and special treatment. Another facet of the five-year plan was the purges. Stalin purged the government, the army and the country of everyone that disagreed with him. He killed millions, through mass…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays