Preview

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
230 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
Roman Republic was undemocratic, not favoring the people. Candidates weren't elected by the people. Laws were decided and voted on by the Senate not the people. Senate controlled the tregory not the people. Rome was the only place to vote this not catering to people. The people control the government in a democracy. The rich people determined who all people would vote for to rule them. This limited the poor people of having a fair chance of equality. There is room for disorderly conduct, any rich person could easily persuade their ruler to do something they want through bribery.While poor people’s ideas will be discarded, them not having the necessary resources to influence their ruler’s decisions. Laws are necessary to keep order and fairness.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Republic And US Politics: A Comparative Analysis
    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roman Republic And US Politics: A Comparative Analysis

    Comparing and contrasting the final turbulent between the Roman republic and U.S. politics were both controlling land outside of their borders, had the three branches of government, system of checks and balance with no branch of government being the strongest. Some of the differences were that Rome conquered control by subjection and the U.S. tires to include people into the nation. Every citizen that was born in the U.S. had natural rights, but in Rome you were just subjects and not citizens.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His112The Roman Republic And Imperial Rome Matrix
    • 856 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His112The Roman Republic And Imperial Rome Matrix

    The Roman Republic was the period of the ancient Roman civilization when the government operated as a republic.…

    • 856 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    AP world history
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    AP world history

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most Influential Impact in Roman Technology
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most Influential Impact in Roman Technology

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rights and Responsibilities of an Effective Citizen DBQ
    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rights and Responsibilities of an Effective Citizen DBQ

    The Ancient Rome Republic and our government have a lot more in common than you would think. They both have similar ideas of what an effective citizen looks like. An effective citizen obeys rules and laws, holds office, and voices their opinion in the government. These are the roles on effective citizen. Without these, the government would not remain intact without these roles of a citizen.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government
    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Roman Government

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    8th Grade Paper
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8th Grade Paper

    The ancient Greek Democracy and the ancient Roman Republic are different in some ways. They are mainly different because they give people the different ways of voting whether it’s voting on directly on an issue or voting for a representatives. The Roman Republic had 300 elected officials on the other hand, the Greek Democracy just had a small assembly. The Greek Democracy had an autonomy, meaning they were self governed. In conclusion, they both gave freedom to their people but just had a different types of systems.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government
    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Roman Government

    Although the form of government in the Roman Empire changed several times over its thousand year history, many parts remained the same and it has served as a model, inspiring the founding fathers as they created the governmental system of the United States of America almost 2,000 years later. Scattered around seven hills in the middle of the Italian peninsula, Rome began as a simple village of wooden huts. As it grew, it became governed by a monarchy, with a king having complete control. This lasted for over 200 years until the king was overthrown and a republic form of government was developed. Although controlled to a large extent by wealthy land owners and nobles, the general population was given an increasingly larger part in how the empire was run. This form of government worked well and the Roman Empire prospered. However, social unrest in the first century A.D., coupled with several military defeats, ended with Julius Caesar taking control and declaring himself dictator for life, ending the true republic form of government. Assassinated a month later, Rome then entered a period of rule by an emperor, which lasted until the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Roman Empire lasted longer than any other government in the western world and it has provided the foundation upon which the government of the United States is based, along with providing valuable lessons for future generations.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Republic
    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roman Republic

    In many ways, the Roman Republic was very similar to the way the United States government is organized today. There are three clear divisions of power Executive branch, Legislative branch, and judicial branch. The Executive branch elected by an assembly, they ruled as chief executives for one year. Consuls controlled the military as well. The Judicial branch has eight judges that were chosen by the century’s assembly to judge for a year. Two of the eight judges supervise civil court and criminal court. The legislative branch is 300 people ruled as Senate. They were chosen by aristocrats and they reigned over foreign affairs and financial policies. Century’s assembly: A group of citizen soldiers that are members for life. They elect consuls and make laws. Tribal assembly: Citizens are put into groups depending on where they live they are also members for life. Tribal assembly members elect tribunes. Legal code are The Twelve Tables was similar to the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments of the Constitution, however, it only protected the free-born male citizens under the law. The Roman government, though advanced for its time, was prone to corruption and instability. The Senate would usually have more power over the Executive branch and there was very little independence among the branches of government, which tended to be heavily influenced by dominant political faction. The United States distributes its power relatively evenly. Because each state has both local representatives, and representatives in Washington, it helps promote the interests of the people in way that Romans did not. The American Republic is a lot more evolved and refined then the Romans'…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Roman Citizenship
    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Roman Citizenship

    The Roman society allowed people to live their own lives to their preference without the worry of breaking the law or being thrown out of society. At the same time, they also consisted of an organized Roman Senate that was already inherited making their decisions consistent, but at the same time the citizens were allowed to express opinions through a voting system. Social standings allowed citizens to build up from poverty and become wealthy, rather than not having the freedom of being as powerful as you can. Overall, the Roman system is better than the Athenian system when it comes to citizenship, republican system, and social standings because Roman citizens were provided with more freedom and had fewer…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Role Of Democracy In Julius Ceasar
    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Democracy In Julius Ceasar

    50 BC contained a strong element of popular participation even if balanced by a still stronger aristocratic tradition. The Roman version of democracy suffered from the same limitations in the eyes of a modern critic as did the earlier Athenian version. The voters were all adult male citizens so that women, slaves and those who did not have the citizenship of Rome were totally excluded from poitical life. At 450 years as a republic, Rome became and empire in the wake of Julius Caesars rise and fall century…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    World Empires
    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    World Empires

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics