Preview

How Could the Uk Political System Be Made More Democratic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
680 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Could the Uk Political System Be Made More Democratic
HOW COULD THE UK POLITICAL SYSTEM BE MADE MORE DEMOCRATIC?

“…our democratic system isn’t working…public faith in our politicians institutions are draining away and being replaced by a progressive and debilitating alienation.” (David Cameron May 2006)

The UK political system has often been criticized on it level of democracy. However, there are methods or institutes that could be adopted to make the political system more democratic in nature.

Firstly, referendums give people more of a say and gets the opinion of the wider public. Since democracy is rule by and for the people, referendums show teamwork thus removing a gulf between the people and the government. An example of this is the referendum of May 2011 regarding the suggested change in the current form of voting. This is from the first past the post method of voting to the AV method of voting. However, with the use of referendums hasty and uneducated decisions and due to referendums only providing a snap shot of public opinion at a specific time they are an unreliable guide to public interest.

Secondly, initiatives would also make for a more democratic political system. Because initiatives are called by the citizens themselves, it is believed that they therefore truly represent the views of the public. For example, In Switzerland if 1%of the public sign up to a proposal within an eighteen month period the proposal is put to public vote and if passed becomes a law. However, initiatives are subject to emotions (as opposed to real ground judgement) and tabloid campaigns thus it could be taken that they are hasty and selfish motives.

Thirdly, election of the second chamber of government would allow the public to pick those in that chamber given them a voice. For example, The House Of Lords. However, an elected house of lords would actually hinder the democratic process because a government with a majority in both houses would effectively become an "elective dictatorship", and it is pointless

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Referendums are likely to give additional power to pressure groups and other organisations that would seek to influence the outcome. Take the Scottish referendum held two weeks ago. The die hard Scott’s were hugely influencing the rest of the population to vote for independence by using anti-UK propaganda. However if they went independent then Scotland would of faced a gloomy downward spiral. The ‘Yes’ campaigners were voting for an independent Scotland, which was uncertain which currency it was going to use, which had no…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political parties are key institutions at the heart of the political system. However, the claim that political parties are in decline puts forward the case that the significance of the party role is diminishing. It suggests that other institutions and processes are increasingly carrying out the functions of political parties, and that these alternatives are now dominating these roles and carrying them out more efficiently.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “…that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent does democracy in the UK suffer from a participation crisis? (25 marks)…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums cause the public to become more educated and engaged, which would help the UK to become more democratic. For example, the Scottish referendum scheduled to take place next year has already started campaigning, with their “Yes, Scotland” campaign. Through activities like campaigning, the government can engage the public and they then become more educated about it.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy. The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how politics works in Britain. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster. This in turn means any of our votes just don’t count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties continue to focus all their time, money and effort on a handful of 'marginal seats', so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums could help promote direct democracy, as referendums help the distinction of clear ideas and policies, there can be no distortion from the government over policies. Additionally, the outcome of referendums can make the political decisions made legitimate. An example of referendums promoting direct democracy could be the 1998 Northern Ireland referendum, “The Good Friday Agreement” where 71.1% of the voters voted yes, as to whether Northern Ireland should become independent.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United Kingdom changing radically with Labour’s landslide victory , the greatest since 1945. Led by Tony Blair, the party promised an ambitious programme of constitutional reforms which they themselves claimed would lead to “the most ambitious and far reaching changes to the constitution undertaken by any government in this century” (Hazell, Sinclair, 1999, p42)These reforms were also pioneered by Gordon Brown when he became Blair’s successor in 2007. While some of these amendments were successfully implemented others were abandoned or were watered down greatly. Also, the planned reversal of many of these reforms and other amendments made by the recent coalition Government must also be deliberated , however, as the coalition Government has only been in in power two years it is harder to see if they have had any real effect yet . Therefore this essay will focus on the constitutional reforms made by New Labour and will discuss that while they have made a difference, the impact has been limited and far less radical than they first proposed.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second way in which the UK democracy participation can be strengthened is making voting compulsory. Compulsory voting is very self-explanatory and basically means that the government will enforce voting upon those eligible and will only accept the vote if the turnout is 90%+. The main advantage of making voting compulsory is that there would obviously be greater participation and interest in politics. The more people that vote the better because then everyone would have had their say in what way the country should be ran and it will create a fairer result. Also an interest in politics would develop as people would want to know what they were voting for.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is no wonder that John Kerr describes Britain as being “nowhere near being democratic in 1850.” The state of democracy in Britain had been set by the Great Reform Act of 1832 which increased the number of men who could vote in a general election and redistributed parliamentary seats so that there was a more equal ratio of MPs to constituents. However Britain was still far from being democratic. The system was not fair as voting took place in hustings meaning there was no secret ballot, making it possible for candidates to bribe and intimidate the voters and general elections were only held every seven years. Another aspect of the British political system that was undemocratic was the unequal distribution of seats and MPs still representing county and borough constituencies with great variations in size of population. Moreover, the Tory dominated House of Lords was unelected and it could stop the elected majority of the House of Commons getting bills though parliament and only wealthy…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the UK, we have been using the First Past The Post system as our electoral system since we became a democracy. Whilst this system works for us, there are many systems that we could use, these being: Closed Party List, AMS, STV and Supplementary Vote. All these have various strengths and weaknesses to them.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One sign that participation has declined in the UK is falling voter turnout. In 1979 76% of the electorate turned out to vote, whereas in 2001 it declined to 59.4%, recovering only slightly to 65.2% in 2010. Voting is an important form of political participation because it is the direct involvement of citizens in the selection of their political leaders. It’s decline is an important indicator of a fall in participation.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many advantages to using referendums in the United Kingdom it entrenches constitutional change and it is a pure form of direct democracy because it lets the electorate decide on the outcome of the referendum also the people’s views on a particular question are clearly indicated a referendum helps to make decisions legitimate and confirms the principle of government by consent. Another advantage of referendums is that provides increased acceptance for decisions because if the citizens have demonstrated their expressed consent, they are more likely to accept the decision. Another important advantage to referendums is that it prevents governments from making unpopular decisions when a “no” vote is delivered. Referendums entrenches constitutional changes it protects them from attacks by future governments whose policies may be short term because in order to reverse a referendum decision, it is widely accepted that a fresh referendum would have to be held. This principle prevents the possibility that a future government would simply dismantle constitutional reforms already made.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays