The components of honesty versus justice and due process versus crime control are vital elements of the series of tasks produced within a criminal justice system. To communicate successfully to the diverse members of a community, the criminal justice system must be capable of clearly displaying honesty, justice, and reliability. Due process and crime control must also be an obvious constituent of the criminal justice system to instill safeguarding within the community. The responsibilities use basically every segment of the criminal justice system, along with cooperative and scholarly physical training, education, and private security industries. This paper will present honesty versus justice and due process versus crime control by elucidating the ethical dimensions of key issues confronting the criminal justice system and private security. Honesty versus Justice
Imposing honesty will help the justice system be successful. The system must also be legitimate and the professionals sincere. For a criminal justice system to retain professional employees, morality such as truthfulness, fairness, trust, awareness, and respect of oneself and the position of employment must be implanted. For a criminal justice system to maintain legitimacy, concepts of relevance based on moral principles, prudence, and fairness, must be infused. Agencies and employees who demonstrate honesty and justice reveal a sense of morals and ethics, and the system or professional will contest for fair dealings and decency. This encourages the public to trust confidently the legal system and the skilled employees of the legal system. According to Kevin Knight, author of Honesty; Whether Honesty Should Be a Reckoned Part of Temperance, “…the honest is that which is deserving of honor. It is the just and the brave who receive most honor. Therefore honesty pertains, not to temperance, but rather to justice and fortitude” (The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, 2008, ¶3).
Honesty in a structure that upholds justice has generated a notorious concern amid the criminal justice environment. Honesty is an essential component when seeking justice. An example of a dishonest act of justice that can negatively affect a system is the 2010 case of Washington officers who committed crimes and violated policies. According to the article, Cop case for CCC, by Trevor Paddenburg, police officers took advantage of innocent people by creating phony charges so arrests statistics would be increased. While working, many of the officers purposely initiated arguments so excuses could be used to make bogus arrests. Additional complaints of officers smugly remarking about performing sexual acts with women in the alleyways were also filed (The Sunday Times, 2010, ¶3-17). If a continuation of negative, illegal, and immoral conduct continues within a criminal justice system, such as the previously mentioned case, the structure will eventually begin to crumble. Maintaining honesty and justice within a criminal justice system is imperative to the prolongation of the agency and crucial to the wellbeing of the community.
Justice is the creature that people rely upon, as a nation and a society, to make a distinction between true and false, right and wrong, bad and good, and last, lawful and unlawful. Reliance on righteousness preserves the protection of people from malevolence and permits people to reside exclusive of anarchy, and in tranquility and accord. If innocent people are inadvertently charged for crimes, or if criminals are not prosecuted or rightfully prosecuted for the severity of a crime, justice cannot be in existence. To prevent such occurrences, the legal system must demand absolute honesty. For example, if after swearing in, a person makes false accusations or provides false evidence against an innocent person, he or she should be held accountable for committing perjury and punished as a...