Preview

Homeland Security and Civil Liberties

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homeland Security and Civil Liberties
Homeland Security and Civil Liberties
Extra Credit Report: Unit 17

December 13, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Questions

Question One- What tensions exist between governmental power and civil liberties?
Question Two- Use a metaphor to describe a zero-sum game of balancing governmental power, security, and individual’s rights.

Question 3-How does the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001 and its renewal in 2006 increase executive authority.

Question 4- Describe how the changes made the 2006 compromise between Congress and The White House.

Question 5- What are the arguments for increased executive power?

Question 6- Compare the arguments against such power.

Question 7- How has the courts reacted to the arguments

Question 8- Should law enforcement be militarized to prevent terrorism?

Bibliography …………………..Final Page

We are told by our leaders that there are trade-offs when considering our security; that in order to create a secure America we must give up some freedoms and rules of our democracy for the protection of all. Homeland security involves many factors it does decrease civil liberties and individual freedoms and it totally increases governmental power; a thing ends its impossible to construct a counterterrorist system that ensures complete protection, allows for maximum civil liberty, and protects unrestricted freedoms of movement matter of fact the government is sacrificing some of its own branches to place more authority within one for each, the executive branch (White, Jonathan, 2006). Nothing centralizes power like war. Whether faced with a threat real or manufactured, it seems that people sink into a mind-less situation agreeing to anything. When the emperor of Rome burned the city in effort to persecute Christians, he gained control of the population; we did not learn. When, Hitler burned the Reichstag shortly after elected, he blamed the destruction of this government building on his political enemies;



References: Executive Orders Disposition Tables. (2003). The Federal Register. Executive Orders Disposition Tables. Retrieved on December 12, 2008 from:              http://www.archives.gov/federal=register/executive.orders.html Kime, A.O           Retrieved on December 12, 2008 from: http://www.matrixbookstore.biz Osterburg W Retrieved on July 26, 2008 from: A Method for Reconstructing the Past Senate Congressional Record Retrieved on December 12, 2008 from: http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_cr/s4081.html United States Code Retrieved on December 13, 2008 from: http://uscode.house.gov/downloads White, Jonathan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article discusses Homeland Security's decision to renew Raytheon's contract as its cyber protector. In September Raytheon was picked as the main contractor for the Network Security Deployment division. This new contract is directly influenced by the companies new plans to prioritize cyber security as just last year the Office of Personnel Management was hacked, leaving data on 21.5 million people comprised. Moreover, in January of this year, a report on Homeland's cyber security admitted to limitations in ability to detect possible malware. Overall, cyber security is a controversial issue. An example of this is the debate surrounding the unlocking of a terrorist's iPhone in December, which Apple refused to do.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Department of Homeland Security are wide-ranging, and their goal is clear: “A safer, more secure America, which is resilient against terrorism and other potential threats.” The three key concepts form the foundation of our national homeland security strategy designed to achieve this vision: The three are as follows 1) Security 2), Resilience 3), Custom and Exchange. These concepts drive broad areas of activity that the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) process defines as homeland security missions. It prevent, to protect, to respond, and recover, as well as to build in security, to ensure resilience, and to facilitate customs and exchange. The responsibility falls on hundreds of thousands of people from across the federal government, state, local, tribal, and territorial…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Department of Homeland Security was formed through the Homeland Security Act of 2002. It is a cabinet level agency which comprise of 22 component agencies with about 240,000 employees (Johnson, 2015). Creation of DHS was a resultant effect of September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in U.S.A. hence became the largest restructuring of the federal government after President Harry Truman and Congress created the CIA, Defense Department, and National Security Council in the 1940s. The missions of the agency include counterterrorism; border security; aviation security; port security; maritime security; cyber security; detection of nuclear, chemical, and biological threats to the homeland; protection of our national leaders through…

    • 3719 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with Benjamin Franklin, in many situations, it is favorable to give up public liberties so that we may ensure public safety. Such is often the case in airports, schools, federal buildings and various other locations. Additionally, while the constitution means to secure America’s liberties as well as insuring its domestic tranquility, it has been shown in several situations that this can not always be upheld.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Homeland Securty]

    • 2862 Words
    • 12 Pages

    At the beginning of the twenty-first century everything changed for the United States of America. Hundreds of people were forced to jump to their deaths. Four airplanes, used as suicidal attack vessels, quaked the earth and the Pentagon as they hit their targets. Thousands of people died as the towers fell. It all happened Tuesday morning, September 11, 2001. Al-Qaeda, an Islamist militant group, was responsible for this brutal terrorist attack. It forced the United States to restructure the architecture of its own government in order to properly respond to a new terrorist threat. The US government had to consolidate “22 government agencies involving 180,000 employees, for the purpose of, as President George W. Bush stated, ‘ensuring that our efforts to defend this country are comprehensive and united’” (Mabee 386). In response to compromised national security, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was created. The DHS is responsible for the coordination and unification of homeland security efforts in the United States (Kemp 28). In order to evaluate the success of the DHS I have to analyze whether it’s possible to prevent terrorism, if the US has been more secure since the DHS was created, and whether the DHS compromises our freedom to protect it.…

    • 2862 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is safety worth giving up your liberty? Every day the federal government passes laws to make us a safer society. As they make society safer, they are slowly chewing away at our rights, liberties, and our personal freedom. Where is the balance? At what point do we tell the government that we would rather die than become mindless government slaves? Where is the line between where our right to choose is more important than the government’s right to impose their standards on us? Even if it’s for our own good? For me, I was born in a country where its people had a little to no right, and it is all because of the government.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Do you see any tensions in these measures between maintaining security and protecting individual rights? What does this suggest about the particular threat terrorism poses to democratic societies?…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homeland Security

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Homeland Security Committee is very important in the U.S. National Government. This committee deals with protecting our country from illegal immigration. The chairman on this committee is Thomas Carper. Carper is of the Democratic Party. The ranking minority member is Thomas Coburn. Coburn is of the Republican Party. There are multiple subcommittees under the Homeland Security. Four of them are: Parmanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), Financial and Contracting Oversight (FCO), The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Federal Programs and the Federal Workforce (FPFW), and Emergency Management, Intergovernmental Relations and the District of Columbia (EMDC). There are many bills that this committee has proposed. One is S.2927, which is a bill to strengthen Inspector General audits and investigations by streamlining computer matching agreements. Second is S.2925, which is a bill to provide for the elimination or modification of Federal reporting requirements. Third is S.1045, which is a bill to amend title 5, U.S. Code, to provide that persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term “Homeland Security” was born of the domestic terrorism incident in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in 1995. With the realization that our national security could really be threatened on any day of the week, our government leaders decided to take action. The Department of Homeland Security was born of the international terrorism incident on September 11, 2001. There were multiple steps in place addressing our homeland security issues prior to the events of 9/11. Unfortunately, none of these reports were effective in stopping the worst terror attack on United States soil. These types of events obviously to not wait for optimal planning by U.S. countermeasures.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homeland Security Threats

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because of this, the organization of Homeland Security was created to protect the safety of the American people and its soil. Since then Homeland had held the perpetrators accountable and has worked to prevent the recurrence of similar atrocities on any scale whether abroad or at home. “The War on Terror extends beyond the current armed conflict that arose out of the attacks of September 11, 2001, and embraces all facets of continuing U.S. efforts to bring an end to the scourge of terrorism.” (The White House) There have been may success due to the relentless actions of DHS: “They have deprived al-Qaida of safe haven in Afghanistan and helped a democratic government to rise in its place. Once a terrorist sanctuary ruled by the repressive Taliban regime, Afghanistan is now a full partner in the War on Terror.” (The White House) There has been “a multinational coalition joined by the Iraqis, which is aggressively prosecuting the war against the terrorists in Iraq and have strengthened the ability of the United States to disrupt and help prevent future attacks in the Homeland by enhancing counterterrorism architecture through the creation of the Department of Homeland.” (The White House) Yet, we are still not sate, we still continue to face terrorist attacks and challenges. “Terrorist networks today are more dispersed and less centralized. They are more reliant on smaller cells inspired by a common ideology and less directed by a central command structure.” (The White House) Although, the United Sates has considerately improved the economy such as; air, land, sea, and border security, Homeland is not immune from attack. “Terrorists have declared their intention to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to inflict even more catastrophic attacks against the United States, our allies, partners, and other interests around the world.” (The White…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since October 26, 2001, Americans have been debating the issue of the USA PATRIOT Act (PLAW 107-56, 2001) and its claimed encroachment of American civil liberties and Constitutional rights. Many Americans oppose this new law because they believe it gives the Federal Government and its agencies too much freedom to conduct surveillance using various methods (i.e., cell phones, internet, financial systems databases), and argue that freedom goes against their First Amendment rights which protect their freedom of speech and their Fourth Amendment Rights which protect “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” (Justice, 2006). It can be said that some Americans also believe that the PATRIOT Act is unethical and unconstitutional, based on my research, and has little to no benefit to National Security. Many Americans do not understand how important this new legislation is and how beneficial it could be when the systems that are being implemented have a chance to grow and the government agencies that have been tasked with using this new legislation have the opportunity to perfect its application. The PATRIOT Act legislation, while controversial, has been far more beneficial to the safety of the American People and National Security while not illegally violating Constitutional rights.…

    • 2585 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In post 9-11 Americans have traded some of their freedom and rights for security. This kind of security for century have taken some privacy rights of American citizens and increased the government's ability to spy on their own citizens. As a result, people have been less motivated to use their first amendment right especially if they feel they could be a terrorist. Although our freedom can be limited and less important, however when it comes to national security and protecting the citizens from terrorists, people should always pay the cost of…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Irrational fear is a killer. It throws off our survival compass ... And it allows us to willingly give up the civil liberties we have enjoyed for more than 200 years simply because our 'leader' tells us there is a 'terrorist threat'" (Moore 104). The government is currently causing and benefitting from irrational fear in millions of Americans. Americans are giving up numerous basic libereties just to feel safe. The federal government, as a result, is assuming more authority and can do as they please. The Patriot Act is a prime example of this. In the Patriot Act, the government was given many new powers, one of which directly violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. The federal government can investigate anybody and break into their homes unannounced to search their possessions, as long as they suspect that they are a "terrorist threat". The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Etzioni, A. (2004). How patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom versus security in the age of…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays