Preview

home reading report

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
home reading report
Every jury has a leader, and the verdict belongs to him.
Wendall Rohr and a legal team of successful tort lawyers have filed suit on behalf of plaintiff Celeste Wood, whose husband died of lung cancer. The trial is to be held in Biloxi, Mississippi, a state thought to have favorable tort laws and sympathetic juries. The defendant is Pynex, a tobacco company.
Even before the jury has been sworn in, a stealth juror, Nicholas Easter, has begun to quietly connive behind the scenes, in concert with a mysterious woman known only as Marlee.
Rankin Fitch, a shady "consultant" who has directed eight successful trials for the tobacco industry, has placed a camera in the courtroom in order to observe the proceedings in his office nearby. He has begun to plot many schemes to reach to the jury. He planned to get to Millie Dupree throughblackmailing her husband through a tape that has him trying to bribe an official. He reaches to Lonnie Shaver through convincing a company to buy his employer and convince him through orientation. He also tries to reach Rikki Coleman through a blackmail of revealing her abortion to her husband. As the case continues, Fitch is approached by Marlee with a proposal to "buy" the verdict.
However, as Fitch investigates Marlee's past, he discovers that her parents have been killed by smoking and that Marlee was actually planning against the defense. However, he has already sent the $10 million, so he lost $10 million in addition to having lost the trial.
Easter becomes jury foreman after the previous one became ill (an illness resulting from Nicolas and Marlee spiking his coffee) and convinces them to find for the plaintiff and make a large monetary award – $2 million for compensatory damages, and $400 million for punitive measures. The defense lawyers and their employers are devastated. Whilst Easter and Marlee are now rich through short-selling the tobacco companies' stocks and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Verdict Ethics

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the Catholic hospital where the incident happened. The defendants offer $210,000 to settle out of court but Frank declines. Frank feels this is his chance to do something right. Everyone was not happy with Frank declining the settlement. A lot of things start to go wrong for Frank in the case: the brother in law finds out how much the settlement was and how he denied it, his expert medical witness disappears, his substitute witness testimony is questioned, the defendant attorney Concannon has an expert legal team, and the Judge favors Concannon. Mickey finds out Laura is a spy for the opposing side and Frank punches her in the face. Frank then finds Kaitlin Costello Pryce, a nurse that was asked to change her notes on the admittance form after the incident to hide Dr. Towler’s error. Deborah Ann Kay had eaten 1 hour before admittance and no anesthetic is supposed to be given if so. Even though the testimony is not supposed to be used because of legal technicalities it stuns the courtroom. Frank then tells the jury a closing statement about justice and truth. Frank wins the case and the jury wants to increase the award.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ?Buder?s ex-wife, Sartore, sued him, alleging that he had breached his fiduciary duty owed to the children under the UGMA. She sought to recover the funds lost by Buder?s investment of the children?s funds in penny stocks. Who wins?? (Gift)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, this means that the plaintiffs lost a 20 million dollar settlement deal for nothing. Ultimately, the plaintiff’s become desperate, they have no money and no way to pay of all of their debts. They end up settling on an 8 million dollar deal with Grace. “A settlement agreement has been reached between both parties. The exact conditions shall remain private between the parties involved” [1]. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s family would get 375 thousand each but with no apology and additionally, no clean up. Schlichtmann and his firm falls apart as they are all left with nothing but bankruptcy. Because of the plaintiff’s excessive settlement demands and gambling, they lose everything thanks to this case. Furthermore, Schlichtmann gives his files to the EPA, who end up ordering a 69.4 million dollar cleanup of the contaminated area. In which, Beatrice and Grace had to pay for. Ultimately, both the plaintiffs and defendants ended up paying more in the long run. Based on their principles in the beginning movie and if Jan did not have a change in heart it may have ended in the plaintiff's…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bryant was charges with 35 counts of murder, 20 of attempted murder, four of aggravated assault, eight of wounding, three of causing grievous bodily harm, one of arson and one of unlawfully setting fire to property.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anne Anderson initially told one of Jan’s partners her story and put many calls into their office. However, she never a response from them! So Anne put a call into Jan Schlitchmann while he was on a radio show. Jan and his partners discussed the case and Jan agreed to go and meet with Anne and the family member’s of the children who died from Leukemia. So he went to the city of Woburn Wells. Jan saw the companies W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods and thought it would be a goldmine for the law office to take on the case. Anderson told Jan that she and the other families were not looking for money in this lawsuit. The families only wanted an apology from the companies and for someone to clean up the area and make sure it would not ever happen again.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In December 2010, the Court of Appeals issued a ruling in favor of M’s appeal and reversed the lower court’s ruling on the matter. This meant that the Court of Appeals overturned the jury verdict and the $18.5 million judgment against M.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Verdict follows the story of a medical malpractice case in Boston many predicted would not be successful. The alcoholic lawyer Frank Galvin experiences a variety of hardships during the trial. From the beginning of the movie, we are given an inside look at Frank Galvin’s life as an ambulance…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Report

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Title of the Book: The AMAZING DAYS of ABBY HAYES#1---every Cloud has a Silver Lining |…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. In part of the case not included here, the court notes that Mr. Woolley died “before oral arguments on this case.” How can there be any damages if the plaintiff has died? Who now has any case to pursue?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nick manipulated his way onto the jury and then after the trial made an offer that the jury could be bought for a monetary price. Deontology, was used by Nick after gaining the trust of the parties in the jury, Nick used his influence to assure that others feelings as to their moral duties, obligation and right action was used in his favor. In this case the bribe was paid and collected, the jury was pushed in favor of the plaintiff with a huge monetary award. The bribe was use to force the jury consultant Flitch to retire and the money used to benefit victims in the previous shooting in Gardner…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Report

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paul’s uncle, Joe, and cousin, Joe Jr., are foils in this “lass struggle” that ultimately fractures the Crown family and forces Paul to leave his uncle’s home to find work on his own. The behavior and work ethic of Joe. Who is born to wealth and privileged in America, is juxtaposed with that of immigration Paul. Jakes portrayed Joe Jr. as spoiled and without focus especially when compared to Paul’s mature approach to life and work.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    each juror has there own deficiencies or less than ideal qualities, these emerge through their interactions with eachother or their attitudes towards their trial. juror 10 is predjudice regularly using stereotypes to condemn the defendsant without actually considering if what he is saying is true. such as ‘a very big drinker’ or a born liar’ the third juror is guilty of stereotyping the defendant based on age, and he defends his opinions and stereotypes violently in the jury room, such as his near attack on 8th juror at the end of the first act. the play does not let a single character escape unflawed. even 8th juror,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 3rd juror is the most outspoken about the 'guilt' of the teenager. As the play goes along it is revealed he has a personal connection with what has happened, he feels anger towards his own son, an anger which he has transferred onto the accused. A key moment for the third juror is when he finally changes his vote to ‘not guilty’ which is when he is reminded by the 8th juror “It’s not your boy. He’s somebody else’”, followed by the 4th juror stating “let him live”. Right up to this point, the third juror was committed to his ‘guilty’ vote. By juror 3 allowing his emotional baggage to enter the jury room with him it is clear that from the beginning of the play, his personal experience with his son were physiologically too powerful for him to be able to make the right verdict for the defendant.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Study 2

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics