Preview

Holmes V. South Carolina Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Holmes V. South Carolina Case Brief
Holmes v. South Carolina
United States Supreme Court 547 U.S. 319 (2006)
:
Facts:
Holmes was charged with first degree murder, first degree burglary and robbery in connection with an incident involving an 86 year old woman, Mary Stewart. Holmes was also charged for the rape and murder of Stewart. At the trial court, Holmes was convicted by the South Carolina Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. The petitioner had appealed and the court granted a new trail. During the new trial the prosecution introduced new forensic evidence including palm prints and blood that was found at the scene of the crime. At the new trial, the petitioner also sought to introduce proof of another man named Jimmy McCaw White. The court excluded the third party evidence of guilt because the grounds of the evidence were not admissible. The evidenced only implicated that the third party and did not exclude the defendant. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari
Issue:
Is evidence of a third party’s guilt admissible if it only implicates the third party and does not exculpate the defendant?

Rule and Rationale:
Yes. Under the Constitution of the United States, a defendant in a criminal case has to be given the opportunity to present a complete defense. The defendant also has the right and opportunity to present evidence of innocence, and only the evidence of guilt of a third party. Excluding evidence and only hearing the prosecutions evidence in the case did not give the court the right to make a conclusion based on the evidence at hand. The evidence against the prosecution supported that the defendant was guilty but did not automatically exclude the evidence of the third party as weak. Holmes was entitled to introduce the evidence of Whites guilt. The exclusion of that evidence violated Holmes 's right to have the opportunity to present a complete defense.

Standard Relied On:
State v. Gay, 541 S.E.2d 541, 545 (S.C. 2001).
The case gave



References: State v. Gay, 541 S.E.2d 541, 545 (S.C. 2001) Holmes v. South Carolina United States Supreme Court 547 U.S. 319 (2006)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Nash V. Auburn

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two Students of Auburn University David Nash and Donna Perry were accused of cheating on their anatomy exams, which was a violation of the Student Code of Professional Ethics at Auburn. At a university hearing which was to determine the merits of their charge, faculty and student witnesses testified they observed Nash and Perry cheating in various way and at multiple times during their exams. At the conclusion of the hearing the students were suspended from the university, they appealed with dean and then later the president of Auburn, who both agreed with the hearings judgment. The students then filed suit, arguing that Auburn suspended them based on constitutionally inadequate procedures that violated their rights under the due process clause. The district court entered judgment for Auburn, the students then appealed and the courts of appeals agreed with the district court decision.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was evidence that wasn’t collected such as blood that Mrs Chamberlain offered to give to the police. Evidence such as their tents and belongings were moved to a motel on the first night, which could’ve caused contamination allowing the evidence to have alterations. Their tents and belongings were also not searched. In addition, the family was then allowed to leave in their car the following morning without it being explored allowing contamination with another piece of evidence. Furthermore, evidence that was discovered later on in the case such as Azaria’s jumpsuit was moved then picked up and was not placed as it was found which tampered with the evidence. Although the collection of evidence throughout this case demonstrated faults, the Jury still concluded to Mrs Chamberlain as a guilty woman, which led to her…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence In Tom's Case

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page

    Would evidence have been used in Tom’s case? According to a case dealing with an African American, no it wouldn’t. No one seemed to take into consideration that the man “didn’t match the victim’s description of [her rapist],”(INNOCENT MAN’S EIGHT YEAR PRISON ORDEAL). But this evidence didn’t seem to matter, as they were convinced the man had committed the crime. Yet another case when the victim didn’t identify the man as the criminal. A man “Josh Ryen, attacked by three Caucasian or Latino man [had attacked and robbed him], not one African American [like the one that had been convicted of the crime]” (Wooten). The trail should have waited until Ryen's testimony could be heard. Even after Ryen's statement on who the real criminals were evidence…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. After the first and second trial, despite strong opposing evidence, the country was convinced that no matter the circumstances, two innocent white women had been raped by a group of black men. With the following trials, the country began to come to terms that two of them, Eugene Williams and…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Hardwick was observed by a Georgia police officer while conducting in the act of consensual homosexual sodomy with another man at his home. Hardwick was arrested and charged with violating the Georgia statute of committing sodomy in the bedroom of his home. The district attorney, Lewis Slaton decided not to prosecute Hardwick or his partner, but Hardwick filed suit in the federal district court against the police and Georgia’s attorney general, Michael Bowers, holding that the Georgia statute of antisodomy placed him in danger of arrest but more importantly violated his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed the suit in favor of Bowers. Hardwick appealed…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article says “Booth also left behind evidence seemingly exculpating mary in the assassination plot.” Furthermore, the journal didn’t mention Mary. The last reason Mary Surratt wasn’t guilty was the list of Booth’s helpers. That list didn’t have anything about Mary Surratt, yet it did contain information about all other helpers. The untrustworthy conspirators gave up information about all others but Mary Surratt. Could Mary Surratt still be guilty, the people used as evidence were conspirators.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The jury deliberated for less than an hour before acquitting Butler. This was a case that was all over the media and from the start had people thinking he had done it. While watching the video in class, it had me really thinking. I simply did not believe anything the prosecutors were saying. Nothing was making sense to me, the confession, and the eye witness. I just did not think that Brenton Butler had killed 65 year old Mary Ann Stephens.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Monster written by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is convicted of a felony murder. As a member of the jury in my eyes Steve Harmon is not guilty. Three reasoning’s behind my conviction are that they have no evidence that he was there at the time of the crime, there is no probable cause to link him to the crime, and all the evidence says he was not there.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A defendant is generally entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000). A circuit court can only…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of the forensic evidence the prosecution had brought out was shown to be no good by Henry Lee, an expert in forensic science who was hired by the defense. Almost the whole case that the prosecutors argued was questionable and the jury's job is to…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewell v state case brief

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Bridget Fisher bought a house in 1989 by herself. She married Barry Jewell, and he helped her fix the house. They lived together on and off and then married in 1990. Later, they got divorced and Jewell moved into his friend's apartment. When Jewell found out that Fisher was seeing another man, he told his friend that he wanted to beat her boyfriends head with a 2 by 4 and cut his dick off.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherlock Holmes was not guilty for killing Doctor Roylott because Sherlock Holmes was acting out of self -defense. Doctor Roylott tried to kill Helen Stoner with a dangerous snake. Sherlock Holmes was hired to protect Helen Stoner because she was in danger. If it was not for Sherlock Holmes, Doctor Roylott would have gotten away with another murder. Sherlock Holmes was acting out of…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In paragraph two, the author states “Holmes often used to get at the truth by: scientific, or forensic, evidence”. In this statement, the author supports the idea that scientific evidence is a widely used style of investigation in a court case. Also, the author also does a great job of of giving examples of why forensic evidence is the most significant form of evidence used in…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Specifically, Maddox asserted that his right to due process was violated as outlined in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland by the state 's failure to disclose a photograph taken by the police shortly after the alleged rape showing Elder 's bed neatly made, the results of a police examination of the bedspread which revealed no blood, semen or other fluid, and lastly a written statement by another witness, Brenda Phelps, that Debbie Phillips had stated that she dropped her insurance with Maddox for financial reasons. Maddox appeals the denial of habeas relief.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays