Preview

Separation of Powers and Executive Branch

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Separation of Powers and Executive Branch
Seven Questions will be selected from the following list of Questions for test iii…Politics of Quebec and Canada.

Chapter 8.
1. Compare, critically, the organization of Government in Canada and the United States. The parliamentary system is constructed of the crown, executive and legislative branch. The constitution monarchy is that the the Crown which is the Queen is represented by the GG. The executive branch are the PM and the Cabinet, in the Parliamentary system, they are elected members of the parliament. The legislative branch is parliament includes the opposition. This shows that the government is very complex. In the parliamentary system we have separation of powers meaning each branch is separate. The US system is not as different as the Canadian system because check and balance. Example, president appoint judges. currently, congress refuse to confirm. 100 judges not confirm.
2. Should the office of the Crown be abolished?
3. Briefly describe the following: (i) Examples of Political statements of the Crown: The Crown is not political but neutral. Miss Clarkson , Crown in 1999 to 2005. In 2001, she sent a message congratulating two gay couple who married I Toronto. The GG Jean went to territories and ate raw seal liver and it was controversial. (ii) Parliamentary conventions: In Section 13 confirms that the GG should be informed of the government’s agenda. ********
4. Describe the functions of the Executive branch of Government.
The Prime Minister is the head and most powerful. He is supported by the Cabinet also called the Privy Council. The Cabinet is made up of about 20 to 40 ministers. Ex: Harper has 39.
In one sentence define the following: (i) Section 54: all laws in regards to revenues must originate from the House of Commons. (ii) Section 11: states that there shall be a council. This is not a convention. The Council shall advise the Crown. (iii) PMO: us the most powerful. This is not mention in the Constitution. This is unwritten and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Source 1: Wells, Donald, and Heather C. Hudak, eds. Canada 's Road on Independence. Vol. 2. Calgary: Weigl Educational Limited, 2005. Print.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Cabinets still hold an enormous amount of power over their Prime Minister. Prime Ministers require the support of their ministers or they risk a party revolution and replacement. For example, Margaret Thatcher lost the support of her Cabinet in her third term and was eventually replaced by John Major. This shows how much power Cabinet can wield over Prime Ministers. Also, the Prime Minister’s power is linked to the backing of the so-called ‘unsackable’ ministers in Cabinet. These ‘unsackable’ ministers are ‘unsackable’ as they have their own little faction in the party behind them to support them in any issue over their ability. For example, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown did not have the best personal relationship but Gordon Brown had…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Canada’s founders were thinking of Canada’s legislature system they valued accountability.[4] Unicameralism is a single legislative house or chamber and their just isn’t the same accountability as the bicameralism legislatures.[5] They did not want one “high-handed Cabinet” because this could pose a threat and to the founders this was “classic forms of autocracy.”[6] This is why bicameralism was introduced to the legislature. They were concentrated on checks on balances in the form of The Cabinet, the Commons, and the Senate, which were like the three branches of government.[7] What is funny is that the word “democracy” was used differently back in those days and they used mixed or balanced.[8] The Founders were viewed as being Liberal democrats because of them picking the bicameralism legislature over the unicamerlism legislature.[9] Also the Father’s visions were never for a “fusion of powers” in the legislature, but that the…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years there has been an increase in the growth of spatial leadership. The tendency of Prime Ministers to distance themselves from their party and government has increased, developing a personal ideological stance. Prime Ministers such as Blair and Thatcher are key examples. Both Prime Ministers have developed their own stances: ‘Blairism’ and ‘Thatcherism’. Blair, for example, had really bad attendance at Parliament and his Cabinet Ministers have been quoted as saying that: Cabinet meeting sometimes lasted only fifteen minutes. This shows that Blair had a tendency to act like a president. It can be said that Gordon Brown is distant from his Labour party to some extent, but not as extreme as Blair. Brown has good attendance at Parliament and regular Cabinet meetings do take place.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early years of the United States, the men who began our government had many issues to resolve. The Separation of Powers in the American democracy is where the early government decided to separate the branches of government into three separate areas. The separation was enacted due to keeping the government from having one person in total control and having a tyrannical form of government instead of a democratic form for the people. The writers of the Constitution; or Framers, were the earliest form of government and thought by following the rules and agendas that they had been following for more than 100 years, that the government would be better…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governor General in Canada

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My research paper will discuss the proposal of institutional reform concerning the function of Governor General. Canada is a constitutional monarchy and the role of the Governor General is to represent Canada as a whole in replace of the Crown or the Queen. Since Canada has no longer any real ties with the British Sovereignty in terms of government rules many would argue if the role of the Governor General has any significance to being an important political actor in Canada’s Constitution. To begin this paper, I will discuss a brief overview on what the role of a Governor General is, their formal powers and executive powers, dignified and efficient. My research paper will then emphasize on an institutional reform in regards to the function of the Governor General, it will discuss why Canada does not need a representation of the Crown any longer since the Governor General’s actions are mainly symbolic, therefore meaning that the new reform would have no Governor General appointed royally but instead an elected officer. The next argument in the development of the research will discuss the arguments against this institutional reform and why the Governor General’s role is still significant in Canada and why this political actor should still be a part of the Canadian Constitution, since in fact it is part of Canadian history and politics. And then lastly on the development is what my personal opinion is on the matter of having an institution reform or not and then finally finishing off with the conclusion of my paper.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cabinet : Chosen by the PM from the governing caucu, these Ministers run major departments of the government such as Defence, Foreign Affairs, Justice etc…They determine government policy. In the Crown`s eyes, they are the government.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Executive Branch consists of the president, vice president and 15 Cabinet- level departments such as State, Defense, Interior, Transportation and Education (Trethan, 2012). The president controls the Executive Branch and chooses the vice president and the cabinet members who lead their departments. A crucial function of…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessments with persuasive reasoning and examples.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is the process of the United States government in which powers and responsibilities are divided among the federal and state governments. Powers not given to the federal government in the Constitution are given to the states. The federal government is made up of three branches: Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Competing Ideologies

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Francis, R. Douglas, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. Destinies: Canadian History since Confederation. Toronto: Nelson, 2008. Print.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Bélanger, Claude. “The National Policy and Canadian Federalism.” Marianopolis College. Accessed October 2, 2012. http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/federal/npolicy.htm.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive and Legislative

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Section 21. The Senate or the House of Representatives or any of its respective committees may conduct inquiries in aid of legislation in accordance with its duly published rules of procedure. The rights of persons appearing in, or affected by, such inquiries shall be respected.…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Collective Rights

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Lychak, P., Gerrits, A. D., Nogue, A., Parsons, J. (2008). Issues for Canadians. Toronto, CA.: Nelson Education Ltd.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays