Preview

Hitler's Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hitler's Foreign Policy
Hitler’s foreign policy was very aggressive, it included that the Treaty Of Versailles should be demolished, That all German speaking countries should be united (Pangermanism), Germany should increase its borders (Lebesnraum), Communism was to be made illegal and these are only a few examples from his policy. Firstly, Hitler broke the Treaty Of Versailles as he stopped paying reparations, another example of when Hitler broke the Treaty is when he remilitarised the Rhineland. The remilitarisation was strictly forbidden in the Treaty but when Hitler did it, Britain said his actions were justified. The Treaty also read the Hitler could not join with Austria, because Italy, France & Britain feared a larger, more powerful Germany. March 9th 1938, Hitler sent his armies into Austria, to restore ‘Law & Order’. The Austrian people welcomed his troops. After his troops were successfully inside Austria, he called for a an Anschluss which was probably rigged. Austrian people voted 99% in favour of uniting with Germany. As well as breaking the Treaty the unification was also an example of Lebesnraum & Pangermanism. This policy was aggressive and the British Prime Minister at the time, Chamberlain, did not challenge this infact he appeased Hitler to please him and hope that he would not attack Britain, this only made Hitler more confident. In the end Chamberlain saw that his policy was failing after Hitler ignored the Munich conference and invaded all of Czechoslovakia. So Chamberlain realised Hitler could not be appeased and he saw that Poland would be the next target of the Nazis, so he promised the Polish government that if Hitler invaded Poland that Britain and France would support Poland. In 1939 Hitler did invade Poland and Britain declared war on Germany, starting the Second World War.

Britain and France’s Policy Of Appeasement

Appeasement was a new idea in Europe, it was a theory that aggressive dictators could be appeased by giving them a little bit of what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    World War Ii and Hitler

    • 8150 Words
    • 33 Pages

    - Appeasement Wordsearch - Appeasement Acrosstick - Appeasement Acrosstick (differentiated) Section 5 Failure of the League of Nations Page 31,32 Page 33,34 Page 35 Page 36,37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 - Information Pages…

    • 8150 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France wanted action to enforce the treaty. They thought that if there was a single soldier in the demilitarized zone then they should use pressure to force Germany into submission.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Churchill, a very strong opponent of appeasement, notoriously said “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”[1]. However it wasn’t till the late 1960s that official Government documents on the subject were publically released which created a new view on Chamberlain and appeasement and that it was the only realistic policy for Chamberlain and Britain to pursue.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Foreign Policy

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2012 HSC Question –“ How successful was Nazi foreign policy in achieving its aims to September 1939?”…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second World War was a culmination of conflicts in Europe, which many argue resulted from the First World War itself. After the Treaty of Versailles condemned Germany to a multitude of reparations that needed to be paid, the country’s people were in need of a strong leader, which they soon found in Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party. Hitler started as a mere war veteran but rose in ranks, eventually taking all power over Germany for himself. He started strengthening the army with plans to expand his empire, which he did, starting with the invasion of Czechoslovakia. If Britain and France had joined forces during this invasion, World War II would have likely still taken place. After all, its path had been set in motion by previous events and would probably have remained true to Hitler’s intentions regardless of any intervention.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler and the rest of Germany rose to power, he began to want to expand the land and invade other nations’ territories. He started to command Germany to fulfill one task after another, all breaking the Treaty of Versailles’ regulations. First, Hitler built up his German military, breaking one of the rules of the treaty. As the German army grew stronger, Britain and France kept their distance and supported it, as Hitler declared it was merely for defensive purposes. Next, Hitler commanded his troops to re-enter the Rhineland, violating the treaty. Again, Britain and France did not take action because they understood Germany’s perspective, as they believed they were doing nothing wrong by entering their own ‘backyard’. From this point on, Hitler believed he was invincible, as he could do whatever he wanted to. At the time, it did not seem like Britain or France or any other countries were planning on stopping him. Therefore, Hitler took advantage of this appeasement, as he saw this as his chance to command Germany to fulfill his personal desires.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely for the outbreak of the First World War, received harsh reparations and was forced to sign the unfair Treaty of Versailles, which made Germany lose territory, as well as limited her armaments. This sparked resentment in the Germans who felt injustice that the war was entirely blamed on them which was prominently evident in Adolf Hitler who rose to power as Fuhrer of Germany in 1933. The highly nationalistic Nazi leader came into power a goal: to make secure and to preserve the racial community and to enlarge it. He hated the Versailles settlement and wanted to destroy it, hence fore building up the army and recovering lost territories to preserve German race. Therefore the in contrast to the Allies, Germany under Adolf Hitler was aggressive and influenced by revisionism. In attempt to preserve peace and not start a war with Germany, Britain and France, the two great powers gave in to Germany instead of standing against the aggressive Hitler. Appeasement is a term often applied to the overly acquiescent foreign policy practiced by Neville Chamberlain when dealing with Hitler’s Nazi regime. However, instead of preserving peace that Britain and France desperately wanted, it ironically allowed Hitler who did not have concrete plans on how to achieve his goals, to exploit their weakness and used situations in his advantage, which then resulted in the Second World War. While some may agree to this stand, others argue that Hitler intended a major war right from the beginning as seen from his book Mein Kampf and later on…

    • 2372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler, Nazi leader of the Third Reich had a profound effect on international relations from the very moment he became chancellor in 1933 to even after his death and the legacy he had left behind. It can be said that in the span of 20 years between 1933 and 1953 Hitler had huge short term significance on international relations, ranging from his views on the treaty of Versailles, war in Europe all the way through to the eventual split of Germany post 1945 following his death. By 1953 Hitler had a catastrophic effect on international relations, he had left Europe in ruins and effectively sowed the seeds for the cold war between The United States of America and the Soviet Union in the years to come.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Policies

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the way the Nazi government set about providing jobs for the unemployed in Germany after 1933.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand the German land for economic means and used the Treaty of Versailles as an excuse to invade Poland. Hitler demanded more out of the French and British Governments, and they decided to give a small portion of Czechoslovakia; Hitler wasn’t satisfied; he invaded the whole of Czechoslovakia in 1939. The French and British Governments at the time didn’t want a repeat of World War I and had an intention of appeasing Hitler to stop further…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Below there are a number of arguments. Some prove that appeasement was a mistake and some suggest that appeasement wasn’t a mistake.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Your Knowledge and the Sources, How Far do you agree With the View That Hitler Consolidated His Power by Legal Means?…

    • 1243 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics