Preview

History of Supreme Court

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Supreme Court
History of the Supreme Court
Royal Audencia
The Royal Audencia was established on May 5, 1583, composed of a president, four oidores (justices) and a fiscal. The Audencia exercised both administrative and judicial functions. Its functions and structure were modified in 1815 when a chief justice replaced its president and the number of justices was increased. It came to be known as the Audencia Territorial de Manila with two branches, civil and criminal. A Royal Decree issued on July 24, 1861 converted it to a purely judicial body with its decisions appealable to the Court of Spain in Madrid. A territorial Audencia in Cebu and Audencia for criminal cases in Vigan were organized on February 26, 1898.
Revolution and First Republic
In the three phases of the Revolution: 1896-97; 1898; 1899-1901, the exigencies of war prevented the thorough organization of the administration of justice. Katipunan councils, then the provisional governments of Tejeros, Biak-na-Bato, and the Revolutionary Republic proclaimed in Kawit, essentially had General Emilio Aguinaldo exercising decree-making powers instituting ad hoc courts and reviewing any appeals concerning their decisions.
In 1899, when the Malolos Constitution was ratified, it provided for a Supreme Court of Justice. President Aguinaldo proposed the appointment of Apolinario Mabini as Chief Justice but the appointment and the convening of the Supreme Court of Justice never materialized because of the Philippine-American War.
American Military Rule
During the Philippine-American War, General Wesley Merrit suspended the Audencias when a military government was established after Manila fell to American forces in August, 1898. Major General Elwell S. Otis re-established the Audencia on May 29, 1899 by virtue of General Order No. 20, which provided for six Filipino members of the Audencia.
Establishment of the Supreme Court
With the establishment of Civil Government, Act No. 136 of the Philippine Commission abolished

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    | L.O. 16-1: Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it, pp. 468-470.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary objection against the Judges’ Case model of appointments is that it finds no basis in constitutional text and is the product of a frenetic Court. Secondly, it places a potent CJP at the center of the judicial system, which severely compromises independence within the judiciary. The primacy accorded to his opinion further facilitated the judiciary’s transformation into a self-perpetuating institution. It also served to politicize the judiciary, which eroded the judiciary’s institutional impression in the public eye. Moreover, the lack of clarity surrounding the application of the seniority principle allowed room for maneuvering, making an already opaque procedure more indefinite and obscure. All of these observations confirm that…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. Supreme Court, in its discretion, decides to take a case, it is said that the Court has:…

    • 610 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State Supreme Court was established through by the Constitution in Articles III of 1787 and gave it authority to hear certain appeals brought from the lower courts and the state courts. If necessary, the United State also has the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Major Cases

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The court’s Ruling was actually somewhat mixed. The court ruled that Marbury did have right to the commissions because the order would go into effect when Adams signed the papers. This was so because he was still in power when he signed them. The also ruled that Congress did not have the power to expand the original jurisdiction of Supreme Court beyond that which is specified in Article III of the Constitution. Their reasoning behind this was that the Constitution states “the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors,…

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first state court system for the American colonies was established as early as 1629 in Massachusetts. They created what was known by as a general court system. This court was comprised of 118 elected officials, and 18 assistants. This in fact set off a chain reaction and a decade later county courts were developed and the general court took on the role of a higher court. As time progressed, so did the courts. By 1776, all of the American colonies had established fully functional court systems (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010). In was not until 1789 when congress gathered to discuss a judicial power for the United States. So on March 4th of that same year the Supreme Court was established as the higher court for America. President George Washing signed the Judiciary Act on September 24, 1789, and later that day nominated John Jay of New York to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The justices changed a number of times throughout time, but after a time it was necessary and was determined that nine justices shall serve on the panel for the court. Even though the justices are nominated by the president, it still…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, which the police apparently recorded. Miranda, who had not finished ninth grade and had a history of mental instability, had no counsel present. At trial, the prosecution's case consisted solely of his confession. Miranda was convicted of both rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had unconstitutionally obtained his confession. The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction. Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court?…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many hoops that a case must jump through in order to reach the federal supreme court, and there are different tracks in which it can get there. The Supreme Court can have original jurisdiction, it can reach the court via the federal system, and it can reach it via the state courts. The Supreme Court receives thousands of cases a year, and will only hear from approximately 80.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States court always has issues thrown at them, but their biggest issue that has last ever since it was created is civil rights. Multiple cases relate with this topic. However, some rule against, but some also rule with it. The Supreme Court has made many decisions to protect the rights of other races in the United States: Dred Scott v. Sanford, Shelly v. Kraemer, and Loving v. Virginia…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bonifacio and Katipunan

    • 3714 Words
    • 15 Pages

    -> the Supreme Court, together with the presidents of two other council, constituted the Katipunan Assembly.…

    • 3714 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sona 2013

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The First Philippine Republic, established in 1899 in Malolos, Bulacan, took ideas from European parliaments where the magisterial role of the head of state in the legislature was to mark its opening. The Malolos Constitution of 1899 provided for the President of the Philippines to preside over the opening of Congress, as well as convey his messages to the legislature through a secretary. When President Emilio Aguinaldo addressed the Malolos Congress on 15 September 1898, he simply congratulated the formation of the first representative body of the Philippines and Asia. This is not considered a State of the Nation Address because the Constitution at the time did not provide for one.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immediately after assuming the presidency, President Aquino issued Proclamation No. 3, which established a revolutionary government.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays