Historiographical Essay: The China-Japan War, 1931-1945
Society for Military History is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Military History.
The China-Japan War, 1931-1945
David M. Gordon
TW AR, Sun Tzu tells us, "is of vital importance to the state, being the
arena in which life or death is decided and the pathway to survival or ruination." The Japanese invasion on 7 July 1937 put the Chinese Republic in mortal danger. In the end, the Republic prevailed. But China was devastated. The war also made possible a successful Communist revolution that destroyed traditional society. By 1945, Japan, too, was almost destroyed. Its empire lost and its political structure remade by its American conquerors, the country would eventually enter a new period of peaceful economic development. Both nations were fundamentally transformed by the conflict. The China-Japan war, the catalyst of these changes, is arguably the most important event in the history of East Asia in the twentieth century. This essay surveys much of the literature on that war, published since the 1970s, from its origins to its end. The war began in 1937. However, the events leading to it started almost twenty years earlier. Marius Jansen describes how, until the end of the First World War in 1918, Japan had participated with other nations in the division of China into spheres of influence.1 Unfortunately, the Japanese were unable to adjust to the postwar anti-imperialist policies of
1. Marius B. Jansen, "Japanese Imperialism: Late Meiji Perspectives," in The Japanese Colonial Empire, ed. Ramon H. Myers and MarkR. Peattie (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), 61-79.
David M. Gordon received his M.A. and Ph.D. from Brown University, and is the author of several books and articles about French and European economic and political history. He is currently working on a study of European and American investments in pre-1949 China, and the advantages the war gave to French and American entrepreneurs. Having previously taught at Kaohsiung National Teachers University, Taiwan, and the Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Paris, as well as several American universities, he is presently a member of the History Department of Bronx Community College and the City University of New York'sGraduate Center. The Journal of Military History 70 (January 2006): 137-82
© Society for Military History
DAVID . GORDON
the Soviet Union and the United States. Russia and the West were ultimately willing to accept a strong, united China in control of its own destiny. The Japanese, with a greater economic stake in the country, were not. Until 1945, the Japanese would not abandon their belief that China was a disunited collection of provinces that could be manipulated one against the other, and ultimately conquered piecemeal. This was one cause of the war.
William Kirby has described how intelligently the Chinese Republican leadership operated in the post-1918 world.2 They used obduracy, legalism, and economic boycotts to reduce Western treaty rights, including foreign control of Chinese maritime customs. But, the methods that worked so well against the West would prove useless at best, and counterproductive at worst, against Japan. Unlike the Western powers, Japan had little reason to change its relations with China. The rise of provincial warlordism after 1916 demonstrated the fundamental disunity of the country. Japan had not been weakened, like Britain and France, by the First World War. The Japanese had also been largely unaffected by Wilsonian ideals about the self-determination of nations. They therefore saw no reason to back down to the demands of Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang (KMT), or Nationalist Party, for treaty revision in the 1920s. When the British, along with the Americans, suddenly adopted a more conciliatory attitude at the end of 1926,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document