Preview

Herodotus and the Scythians

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Herodotus and the Scythians
The accounts of Scythia in Herodotus’ The Histories are organized in concurrence with the timeline of the Persian invasion of Scythia, led by King Darius, where as the invasion progresses Herodotus repeatedly digresses about the history of Scythia until the Persians and Scythians meet, at which point the apparent essence of the accounts of Scythia in The Histories, the Persian invasion, is concluded. Although Herodotus’ description of Scythia seems to be a byproduct of the accounts of King Darius, it is nonetheless thorough. Along with detailed descriptions of the origins of Scythia, as well as its diverse populace, Herodotus seems determined to write extensively on the geography of Scythia. Concerning the veracity of Herodotus’ accounts on Scythia, there is no effort to provide one point of view as fact, but instead he provides many possibilities and then gives input on which he believes to be most accurate. Because of this, there is little evidence supporting Herodotus having a Greek anti-”barbarian” bias. In fact, as Herodotus is considered by many to be the “proto-historian”, his work is not easily weighed against the efforts of those that followed. Rather, the stories Herodotus relates weaves a fuller more comprehensive picture of the time than later histories. This unschooled effort should not be construed to suggest a bias, but a rich and new writing style undiluted by the socratic method to follow in later years. Herodotus describes three possibilities for the origin of the Scythian nation. The first possibility described is the position of Scythian people who state that, “theirs is the youngest of all nations.”¹ As claimed by the Scythians, the first man born on Scythian soil was descendant from the daughter of the Borysthenes River and Zeus. This man, Targitaos, had three sons whose descendants were that of the first three tribes of Scythia. Herodotus clearly states he does not see much merit in this claim, but acknowledges that this is what


Bibliography: Herodotus. “The Histories.” In Landmark Herodotus, edited by Robert B. Strassler, 282-306. New York: Pantheon Books, 2007.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent was Themistocles’ contribution the key factor in bringing about a Greek victory in the Persian Wars, 480-479 BC?…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In evaluating Xerxes’ reign, it is essential to consider the accounts of his contemporaries in order to acquire a first hand portrayal of his actions which have traditionally established his character as one who was incapacitated with power. Herodotus, most infamously referred to throughout history as the “father of lies”, is a ancient Greek writer responsible for the account ‘The Histories’, which chronologically details Xerxes’ kinship and his failed endeavours at the expansion of the Persian empire into Greece.1 As he colourfully recounts Xerxes’ personal conversations, the supposed insanity of his predecessors and his reaction to failed attempts in bettering his empire, Herodotus, who is criticised for being considerably riddled with bias against the Persians, establishes this most inaccurate, yet permanent, portrayal of the Great King. In his Histories, Herodotus explicitly writes of Xerxes, although never having personally encountered one another, as a…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Chapter 1, the author assesses the unique and eternal achievements of 5th century BCE Athenian culture. She introduces several basic dichotomies that define her understanding of the writers and events of the period in the later chapters.…

    • 4035 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my thesis statement, I mentioned that Herodotus was famous and good about both the Greek military history and the Greek cultural history. I analyzed and interpreted what I read on the articles and books that I used while preparing the paper. So, I declared that Herodotus is valuable for both the Greek military history and the Greek cultural history. Do I have to choose only one of them to compare it with another one, and make one of them win at the end of the paper?…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewish Insurgency

    • 19184 Words
    • 77 Pages

    Bibliography: Avi-Yonah, Michael and Baras, Zvi. The World History of the Jewish People, vol vii. The Herodian Period. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1975. Bar-Kochva, Bezalel. Judas Maccabaeus. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 1989. Bar-Kochva, Bezalel. The Seleucid Army. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 1976. Ben-Sasson, H. H. A History of the Jewish People. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Botsford, George Willis. Hellenistic History. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1939. Brinton, Crane. The Anatomy of Revolution. New York: New York: Random House, 1965. Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Ed. And Trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976. Cook, S. A. The Cambridge Ancient History, vol X, The Augustan Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Flavius, Josephus. The Second Jewish Commonwealth. Ed. Nahum N. Glatzer. New York: Schoken Books, 1971. Flavius, Josephus. The Great Roman-Jewish War: AD 66-70. ed. Peter Smith.Gloucester, Mass: 1970. Grant, Michael. The History of Ancient Israel. New York: Charles Scriber’s Sons, 1984. Grant, Michael. The Jews in the Roman World. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1995. Griess, Thomas E. The West Point Military History Series, Ancient and Medieval Warfare. West Point, New Jersey: Avery Publishing Company, 1984. Gruen, Erich S. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. Herzog, Chaim and Gichon, Mordechai. Battles of the Bible. New York: Random House, 1978. Hoffer, Eric. The True Believer. New York: Harper and Row, 1951. _______. I and II Maccabees in the Jerusalem Bible. Alexander Jones, ed., New York: Doubleday and Company, 1966. Keller, Werner. The Bible as History. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1981. Learsi, Rufus. Israel: A History of the Jewish People. New York: The World Publishing Company, 1949. Mao Tse-Tung. On Guerilla Warfare. Translated by Samuel B. Griffith, New York: Praeger Publishing. 1961. Milman, Henry Hart. The History of the Jews, vol II. New York: A.C. Armstrong and Company, 1898.…

    • 19184 Words
    • 77 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tension between academics and popular historians has been evident even during the initial stages of history; between Herodotus and Thucydides. Curthoys and Docker elucidate that Herodotean was “part of the literary world”, whilst Thucydides was based on a “rigorous scrutiny of sources”. It is these two independent categories that fashion the meticulous…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus: An Epic Hero

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Odysseus, man of exceptional wit, bravery, and intelligence, epic hero The Odyssey written by Homer, is nothing short of extraordinary. He fearlessly leads his remaining men home to Ithaca, doing everything in his power to get them back alive and well. While this is undoubtedly a noble deed, Odysseus slips up more than he does any good, therefore making it unfit to call him a hero. A hero is someone who is compassionate, selfless, and wise. He is selfish, disloyal, hypocritical and harsh; everything a hero is not. Odysseus may be an epic hero, but he is far from a true one.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thermopylae Speech

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Herodotos the Historian : His problems, methods and originality, by K.H Waters, (Croom Helm, 1995)…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herodotus was a Greek historian whose work encompassed Western civilization involving conflicts between Greece and the Persian Empire. There were many differences between the Greeks and the Persians. For instance, the Greeks struggled to find freedom during 480 B.C – 400 B.C. They were determined to train their soldiers, especially Spartan warriors, to be brave, courageous, and strong for defensive purposes from Persian invasion. On the other hand, the Persians differed from the Greeks because they believed their Empire needed more power. The Persians exercised gaining absolute power under their leader, Xerxes, by invading civilization west of Asia to strengthen their Empire. Xerxes’ intentions for invasion were also based on vengeance from previous battles for expansion of their Empire. Xerxes motives for invading Greece were tyrannical, and the events that lead the Persian Empire western invasion were based on reckless intentions from a ruthless leader.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilgamesh Essay

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The story of “Gilgamesh” depicts all of the heroic triumphs and heart-breaking pitfalls a heroic narrative should depict to be able to relate to today’s audience. However, “Gilgamesh” was once considered a lost and forgotten piece of literature for thousands of years, so there is a tremendous gap between the time it was created and the time it was translated into language that today’s audience can understand. That gap in history makes several aspects of the story of “Gilgamesh” strange and unfamiliar because what we now know about ancient Middle Eastern cultures and languages is a lot less than what we know about the cultures that prospered after ancient Middle Eastern cultures. Much of the content in the story of “Gilgamesh” is very familiar content to today’s audience but just about all of the characters in the story are not known by the average modern reader of today unless they have already read the story. This is another result of the time gap in the history of the translation of “Gilgamesh.” Figures from later stories are more popular and well known to people who haven’t even read those stories.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Thrasymachus

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato has a different sense of justice than what we ourselves would consider to be justice. Justice starts in the heart and goes outward. Justice is about being a person of good intent towards all people, doing what is believed to be right or moral. Plato believes that once a person has a true understanding of justice that they will want to be “just” for its own benefit regardless of good or bad consequence. Though being just is known to have good consequences also makes being “just” a positive trait. (Clark, 2003, 13) Living a “just” life is good and good is the “well being of well living, the best life is supreme good.” (Bao, 2011, 259) The cause of our happiness is better than being happy itself, which is why this is powerful. We can look at supreme good as experiencing all good things without feelings of regret. (Bao, 2011, 259)…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To be able to understand to what extent Themistocles was responsible for Greek victory in the Persian Wars it first needs to be discussed how he rose to the position of authority and developed the skills that were required of him to make such a substantial impact on the war effort. For as Aristotle said many years later, ‘If you would understand anything, observe its beginning and its development.’ It is evident that Themistocles’ early life reflects his character and his decisive actions seen later in his life.…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herodotus gives all ancient historians invaluable insights into colonisation in the archaic period, despite having his well known limitations. We must overall regard his work ‘The Histories’ as an equal to archaeological evidence and Thucydides’ work when it comes to studying colonisation in this period. Before I begin this essay, however, I must first quickly define two crucial terms. The term ‘colonisation’ (as we mean it during the during the archaic period) has for some reason been debated at great length by ancient historians, who seem determined to remove it as far away from the imperial meaning of the word as possible. I don’t see why, as both have glaring similarities and only minute differences. They both involve one kind of people moving in significant numbers to a new place (where either a different kind of people or no people were present) and establishing their way of life in said location. The only real differences being the literal translation of the word in Greek meaning ‘home away from home’ or ‘trading place’ and the imperial meaning of the word leaning more towards the subjugation of the local inhabitants rather than the replacement of them (which was more common in archaic Greece). The second term is ‘Archaic Period’ which in this essay will be defined as the period from 800 to 478BC.…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamburger, Kate. "From Sophocles to Sarte." Sophocles the Classical Heritage. Ed. R D. Dawe. New York: Garland, Inc., 1996. 251-269.…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian and Peloponnesian wars were both significant conflicts that tested independence. Documenting these wars was obviously hard at this point of civilization, but two men did, and are now known as the great writers of their time. When analyzing the writings of Herodotus and Thucydides, the authors must be compared and contrasted. Though it is almost impossible to know the complete accuracy of their accounts, analyzing the writing style will give us a good sense of their validity.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays