Preview

Henry Tam and the MGI Team

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1108 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Tam and the MGI Team
Henry Tam and the MGI Team
Overview
MGI is a small music software start-up company founded by three immigrants from Russia. The founders comprised of two composers, Igor Tkachenko and Roman Yakub, and a business person, Sasha Gimpelson. The three founders made up their entire business and when they ended up losing money, they realized they needed outside help. To find help, they entered the Harvard Business School Business Plan Contest with seven members. The three founders of MGI were joined by Henry Tam and Dana Soiman from HBS MBA program, Alex Sartakov from Boston Berklee College, and Dav Clark from MIT. Given only three weeks left to create a business plan, the team did not have much done. According to the case, the team had a history of not getting along well with outsiders. The team endured a great deal of conflict and tension throughout each meeting. The most dire issue overall was a lack of team building, leadership, and delegating.

Assessment
After evaluating the MGI’s team process, it is clear that they suffer from a severe disorganization. From the first meeting this was a predominate theme, in fact the full team of seven was not formed before the initial meeting. Henry and Dana from HBS were the first to join the team. Alex became part of the team in the second meeting and Dav joined the team in the third meeting. These added team members came at a shock to Henry and Dana. No one communicated with them that more people will be joining. The meetings were a disaster as there were no agenda or tasks provided for each team member. The work load as a consequence became unevenly distributed. As a result, some team members were overwhelmed by the task of doing more work than others. The meetings became unproductive and the majority of the time was spent disagreeing about what is best for the company.

The root causes for this team’s lack of cohesiveness would be the lack of a team leader as well as no effort in delegating tasks. Without a role

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    P5 P7 M5

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Team cohesion is a vital thing it is what keeps the team together after the…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of us have seen that "Nobody's Perfect - But A Team Can Be" and we have seen a team produce a quality and quantity of work far higher than the sum of what the separate members could have produced on their own. The success of any Endeavour hinges on the behavior, talents, balance and cohesion of this management team. There are two main points when it comes to relevance of teams, the first is the recognition that human strengths usually bring countervailing weaknesses and the second is that some combinations of these roles have a greater probability of team success than others.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order for this team to increase group cohesion, there would actually have to be a group discussion. This team needs to start communicating and discussing what needs to be discussed. Because of the other members not actively participating in this discussion it made it hard to do this assignment. I will hope for a better team discussion next week.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to be an effective team you must accomplish your set goals. To achieve this task a team must first discover and overcome the five dysfunctions of a team. According to Lencioni (2005), “Dysfunction #1 Is the Absence of Trust: Members of great teams trust one another on fundamental, emotional level, and they are comfortable being vulnerable with each other about their weaknesses, mistakes, fears, and behaviors. Dysfunction #2 is Fear of Conflict: Teams that trust one another are not afraid to engage in passionate dialogue around issues and discussions that are key to the organization’s success. Dysfunction #3 is the Lack of Commitment: Teams the engage in unfiltered conflict are able to achieve genuine by-in around important decisions, even when various members of the team initially disagree. Dysfunction #4 is Avoidance of Accountability: Teams that commit to decisions and standards of performance do not hesitate to hold one another accountable for adhering to those decisions and standards. Dysfunction #5 Inattention to Results: Teams that trust one another, engage in conflict, commit to decisions, and hold one another accountable are very likely to set aside their individual needs and agendas and focus almost exclusively on what is best for the team.”…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ba420: Mid-Term

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What factors of a group work situation affect cohesiveness? Explain your answer and give an example.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first team strategy we reviewed was a Leadership Creation strategy. This is close to our traditional team creation strategy, putting our senior members in charge of subordinates’ action, monitoring, and reporting. The strengths of this strategy are channeled communication, consistent reporting, and development of a standardized process. Weaknesses include possible loss of motivation by subordinates and decline in quality control. Because we…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this task I will explain what cohesive team is and what kind of organisation are using it. Building a cohesive team will involve making sure that you have very good staff. It also means having a good communication skill in the team. This will make sure that the team understand what they are doing and that is a good sense of leadership in the organisation.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry Tam Case Study

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The root cause of MGI’s process problems are a lack of direction and clear personal responsibilities. When looking at the team meetings it is very clear that there was little organization to their efforts. It also seemed as though there was not sufficient purpose to the team’s efforts. Many members were more interested in validating their ideas on what to do to others rather than exchanging ideas or creating an open environment. Quiet often there would be time spent on one topic, then another, then more and more without resolving the first topic. The arguments between Sasha and Dana, the HBS students and the musicians, and others never seemed to go anywhere as mentioned by Dana:…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Team Cohesion

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Team cohesion has two predominant types: task and social. Task cohesion is when members of a team can reach a consensus on the method and process of achieving a common goal or set of goals. Social cohesion is when members of a team accept one another on a personal level. A cohesive team can exhibit either type; however, high-performance teams have been shown to exhibit both. “A high-performance team works together to achieve mutual goals, recognizes that each member is accountable and committed to achieving team goals, communicates effectively with each other, shares the joy of achievement and the pain of not meeting goals, shares information, helps each other, and recognizes that the success of the group is dependent upon each individual” (Bulleit, ρ.3).…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strong leadership is crucial for team cohesion. It has been found that the most successful forms of leadership to aid team cohesion are those that provide proper…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The company is struggling with consistency of performance among its teams, not all managers are demonstrating the capability of leading and creating self-sufficient teams. “Too many managers assume that if we just put people together on a team, they will know how to function effectively” (Dyer JR, Dyer, & Dyer, 2013). Organizations and its leaders must understand the critical role that they play in the effectiveness of a team. Team members must be trained to be cohesive and contributing members. It is why managers play an enormous role in the efficiency of a team. They guide the daily operations and overall organizational atmosphere. Managers can create poor performing teams or high performing teams, create a path for success, and produce…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. How do you think the team evolved to this low level of cooperation and cohesiveness?…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case we see how Henry Tam and other Russian founders of the MGI came together I one after the other meeting. Each one of them had experience in one or the other skill. But somehow all the members wer different from each other, Sasha was very unfocussed and was always jumping from one idea to the other, whereas Dan was a concerned person. Dana worried about the team members limited experience and their need for leadership. Dana, Shasha and Henry were very hard working and had the right attitude towards work but they wanted a person who could show the right way to go or the direction to take. In the team building process the three of them included Dav Clark an MIT graduate with a software development experience who will work with MGI on entry for MIT’S business plan contest. As it is quite evident from the case that the team was a potent mix of all the required talent. Team building is a collaborative way to gather and analyze data to improve teamwork. This is what Henry Tam was trying to do as the meetings had become too long and unmanageable and also they were not able to accomplish anything. In a team there is a team battler, a friendly helper and an objective thinker. Henry Tam here in this case…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The team from Nut Island had the potential to accomplish great things. They were a very cohesive team. Cohesiveness relates to the degree to which memebers are attracted to and motived to remain part of that team. A cohesive group member values his or her membership and strives to maintain a positive relationship within the group. Every person working at Nut Island wanted to be there and would not let anything get in the way of their team. When looking at only the cohesiveness of a team, Nut Island would be a good example. They worked together and enjoyed what they did at the sewage plant. Employees worked overtime without being paid for it and without complaining. They used everyone’s skills to take care of the plant and the plant equipment.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Primary problem is Christine lack of leadership skill. If Christine would had known the stages the group development, would recognize the forming stage and define group rules and defining the team tasks. Also would have identified that Mike behavior of lack of commitment would affect the team performance and the assignment goal of teamwork.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays