A child is dying on the street and it would take one minimal effort to save his or her life. Would one help? It is our moral responsibility as human beings and as governments to come to the aid of people in crisis throughout the world. Whether it is a life or death situation or because it is just the right thing to do. Are people morally obligated to help those who need it? When asked on a debating website, almost two thirds answered yes. To turn a blind eye to those we see who are suffering is to be morally bankrupt. The reasons supporting yes outweigh the opposing answer by a landslide.
One reason many would help is because it simply saves lives. For example, proof of this observation can be clearly seen in the Joseph Kony case. In November of 2008, the U.S. sent out troops to capture Kony. This action, in turn, led to the fleeing of Kony and the rescuing of hundreds of children. Without the Americans help, Kony would not have fled and those hundreds of children would not have been saved. The saving of hundreds of lives clearly displays how the assistance of others is crucial. This support saved lives. Another example of how helping others can save lives can be seen in any young child today. PBS ran tests in 2009 to see if helping others was in our genes. They tested this by taking children around the age of two and creating scenes where it seemed sensible to help whoever that child had met that was in need of help. In a particular test, a man had dropped a clothespin on another side of a wall where it had become unreachable to him. Instinctively, the child jumped to his feet, seeming eager to help the man by picking up the clothespin and handing it to him. This test suggests altruistic motivation that can be traced back to our ancestors. This impulse to help others during ancient times was used in hope to increase the chances of that being living. A final example supporting how helping others can save lives can be seen whenever you...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document