Healthy School Lunches
Waking up to go to high school every day isn’t the most fun thing on earth. Sitting through a few boring classes that seem to drag on forever isn’t an exciting way to spend a day as a kid. But, there is one part of school that everyone looks forward to; lunch. After waiting through a couple periods a student can talk openly with his or her peers, and enjoy some food that the school provides. That is, until, something gets slopped onto their plate that looks like cardboard, plastic, or something some people can’t even describe. School lunches haven’t always been this way though, and new, healthier school lunches are to blame. Healthier school lunches are not acceptable the way that they are now, because of the cost they create and the terrible taste of most of the lunches. There are some arguments though, that are for healthy school lunches, but really they aren’t that great.
One of the most important reasons as to why healthy school lunches aren’t ideal is that they are costing more money for the parents that have to pay for their children to eat at school. This is a problem, mostly because the healthy school lunch programs haven’t been proven to be very effective. According to the Nappa Valley Register, “Middle and high school students will be paying an additional 25 cents per lunch — for a total of $2.75 — beginning in 2012-13” at their school district. This will cost parents an extra $45 if their child buys a lunch every day for a regular 180 day school year. This isn’t the biggest cost, though. The Nappa Valley Register says “Adding the required half cup of fruit to school lunches, for example, will cost the district 15 cents per serving — or about $193,600 annually” which is occurring to school districts across America that are effected by the recent changes in school lunches. This is a huge chunk of money that the school uses to get fruit for students. This money could be used for something else, rather than buying...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document