Preview

He Impact of the Financial System S Structure on Firms Financial Constraints

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9018 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
He Impact of the Financial System S Structure on Firms Financial Constraints
Journal of International Money and Finance 30 (2011) 678–691

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of International Money and Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jimf

The impact of the financial system’s structure on firms’ financial constraints
Christopher F. Baum a, b, *, Dorothea Schäfer b, c, Oleksandr Talavera d a Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA DIW Berlin, Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden d School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK b c

a b s t r a c t
JEL classification: G32 G30 Keywords: Financial constraints Financial structure Financial development Cash flow sensitivity of cash

We estimate firms’ cash flow sensitivity of cash to empirically test how the financial system’s structure and level of development influence their financial constraints. For this purpose we merge Almeida et al.’s work, a path-breaking design for evaluating a firm’s financial constraints, with that of Levine, who paved the way for comparative analysis of financial systems around the world. We conjecture that a country’s financial system, both in terms of its structure and its level of development, should influence the cash flow sensitivity of cash of constrained firms but leave unconstrained firms unaffected. We test our hypothesis with a large international sample of 30,000 firm-years from 1989 to 2006. Our findings reveal that both the structure of the financial system and its level of development matter. Bank-based financial systems provide constrained firms with easier access to external financing. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction For many years, financial theory has stressed the role of financial constraints on firms’ behavior, but it has rarely considered how obstacles to external financing may vary across different financial systems. Although stock markets can play a very important role in meeting firms’



References: Acharya, V.V., Almeida, H., Campello, M., October 2007. Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate financial policies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 16 (4), 515–554. Allen, F., Gale, D., 2000. Comparing Financial Systems. MIT Press. Almeida, H., Campello, M., 2002. Financial Constraints and Investment-cash Flow Sensitivities: New Research Directions. Working paper. New York University. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M., 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59 (4), 1777–1804. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 2000. A new database on financial development and structure. World Bank Economic Review 14, 597–605. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., 02 2005. Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter? Journal of Finance 60 (1), 137–177. Bond, S., Elston, J.A., Mairesse, J., Mulkay, B., 09 2003. Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a comparison using company panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1), 153–165. Bond, S., Harhoff, D., Reenen, J.V., 1999. Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany. Working Papers WP99/5. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Chakraborty, S., Ray, T., March 2006. Bank-based versus market-based financial systems: a growth-theoretic analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (2), 329–350. Cleary, S., 04 1999. The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance 54 (2), 673–692. Cummings, J.G., Hassett, K.A., Oliner, S.D., June 2006. Investment behavior, observable expectations, and internal funds. American Economic Review 96 (3), 796–810. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., September 2002. Funding growth in bank-based and market-based financial systems: evidence from firm-level data. Journal of Financial Economics 65 (3), 337–363. Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 78 (2), 141–195. Fazzari, S.M., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., May 2000. Investment-cash flow sensitivities are useful: a comment on Kaplan and Zingales. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2), 695–705. Gilchrist, S., Himmelberg, C., 1996. Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541– 572. Gomes, J.F., December 2001. Financing investment. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1263–1285. Harford, J., December 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance 54 (6), 1969–1997. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Scharfstein, D., February 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1), 33–60. Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1), 196–215. Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., May 2000. Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2), 707–712. Khurana, I.K., Martin, X., Pereira, R., 2006. Financial development and the cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41 (04), 787–808. Kim, Chang-Soo, Mauer, D.C., Sherman, A.E., 1998. The determinants of corporate liquidity: theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33, 335–359. Levine, R., October 2002. Bank-based or market-based financial systems: which is better? Journal of Financial Intermediation 11 (4), 398–428. Love, I., 2003. Financial development and financing constraints: international evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies 16, 765–791. Mairesse, J., Hall, B.H., Mulkay, B., Dec 1999. Firm-level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years. Nber working papers. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Moyen, N., October 2004. Investment–cash flow sensitivities: constrained versus unconstrained firms. Journal of Finance 59 (5), 2061–2092. Myers, S.C., 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 25–43. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., Williamson, R., 1999. The determinants and implications of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics 52, 3–46.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    According to Miller and Modigliani’s (1958) first proposition, the value of a firm is independent of its capital structure, assuming no corporate taxes. It was later demonstrated that the existence of debt in the capital structure creates a debt shield that increases the value of the firm by the present value of the tax shield (Miller & Modigliani, 1963). This line of reasoning implies that debt financing adds significant value to the firm and an optimal capital structure occurs with 100% debt. However, this is an unlikely outcome in reality with restrictions imposed by lending institutions, bankruptcy costs and the need for preserving financial flexibility implying that management will maintain a substantial reserve of borrowing power (Miller & Modigliani, 1963). These imperfections have since been discussed as additional factors when determining an optimal capital structure.…

    • 2215 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract: The value of cash holdings by U.S. non-financial firms has increased significantly over the past three decades. An additional dollar of cash holdings is valued at $0.61 in the 1980s, $1.04 in the 1990s, and $1.12 in the 2000s. The increase in the value of cash obtains across a variety of firm characteristics, including firm size, the investment opportunity set, financial constraints, and the volatility of cash flow. The general increase in the value of cash can be partially explained by firms that IPO in the 1990s and the 2000s. However, for the 1990s, the increase in the value of cash is predominantly determined by a firm’s investment opportunity set and the volatility of its cash flow. For the 2000s, the increase in the value of cash is largely explained by credit market risk.…

    • 14191 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coke Financial Structure

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Kale, J. R., Noe, T. H., & Ramirez, G. G. (Dec., 1991). The Effect of Business Risk on Corporate Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance , 1693-1715.…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. S. De Vany Department of Economics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717, USA e-mail: asdevany@uci.edu W. D. Walls (B ) Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N-1N4 e-mail: wdwalls@ucalgary.ca W. D. Walls School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong…

    • 5022 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cash Flow Statement

    • 3707 Words
    • 15 Pages

    6. Neil S. Weiss and James G.S. Yang, March 2007, The cash flow statement: Problems with the Current Rules…

    • 3707 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Ehrhardt, M. C., & Brigham, E. F. (2009). Chapter 3: An Overview of Corporate Finance and the Financial Environment. Financial Statements, Cash Flow, and Taxes (3rd ed., pp. 79-115). Mason: South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The course project involved developing a great depth of knowledge in analyzing capital structure, theories behind it, and its risks and issues. Before I began this assignment, I knew nothing but a few things about capital structure from previous unit weeks; however, it was not until this course’s final project that came along with opening doors for me to developing a real understanding of why capital structure is important, what to expect from it, and how to evaluate in determining value of a firm. For the first time, various financial statements were closely examined and retrieved via online including Google, MSN, and Yahoo and an extensive amount of research were referred to in order to ensure quality in the project and report any findings that may be relevant to this research. One of the most stimulating part about this assignment was that we were allowed to select a firm of our interest and it was not until this project that I’ve came to suddenly realize there is plentiful amount of information available to enrich us to knowing more about how and why the values are placed about in a firm which convinced me enough to feel that this was the main reason why I selected this assignment to be included for my program portfolio.…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarah Brown, Michael Dietrich, Ortiz Nunez, Karl Taylor. Applied Economics. London: 2013. Vol. 45, Iss. 13, pg. 1731.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    nestle change management

    • 3342 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Cleary, S. (1999). The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status, The Journal of Finance,…

    • 3342 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dept. of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara, 2127 North Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9210, U.S.A.; charness@econ.ucsb.edu and Rady School of Management, University of California at San Diego, Otterson Hall, 9500 Gilman Dr., #0553, La Jolla, CA 92093-0553, U.S.A.; ugneezy@ucsd. edu.…

    • 11173 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kasanen, E., Lundström, T., Puttonen, V., Veijola, R. 1997. Rahoitusriskit yrityksissä. WSOY, Porvoo Kim, E.H. 1978. Miller 's Equilibrium, Shareholder Leverage Clienteles and Optimal Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 33, 310-318 Lessard, D.R., Lightstone, J.B. 1986. Volatile Exchange Rates Can Put Operations at Risk. Harvard Business Review, July-August 1986 Luenberger, D.G. 1998. Investment Science. Oxford University Press, New York Marston R. 2001. The Effects of Industry Structure on Economic Exposure. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 149-164 Mello, A.S., Parsons, J.E. 2000. Hedging and Liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 13, 127-153 Mian, S.L. 1996. Evidence on Corporate Hedging Policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 419-439 Modigliani, F., Miller, M.H. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297 Myers, S.C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 146-175 Nordea. 2004. Financial Instruments. GCS media, Oslo Oxelheim, L., Wihlborg, C.G. 1991. Corporate Strategies in a Turbulent World Economy. Management International Review, 31, 293-315 Paglia, J.K. 2002. An Overview of Covenants in Large Bank Loans. RMA Journal, March 2002 Papaioannou, M.G.G. 2006. Exchange Rate Risk Measurement and Management: Issues and Approaches for Firms. IMF Working Paper, No. 06/255 Pritamani, M., Shome, D., Singal, V. 2005. Exchange Rate Exposure of Exporting and Importing Firms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17, 87-94 Rajgopal, S., Shevling, T. 1999. Stock Option Compensation and Risk Taking: The Case of Oil and Gas Producers. University of Washington Working Paper Shapiro, A., Titman, S. 1992. An Integrated Approach to Corporate Risk Management. The Revolution in Corporate Finance, 2nd ed., Blackwell Smith, C., Stulz, R. 1985. The Determinants of Firms ' Hedging Policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20, 391-401…

    • 26754 Words
    • 108 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diverification

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whether national differnces in financing patterns affect cost of capital is a controversial issue. Rajan and Zingales argue that “It is doubtless more important for a company to worry about making the right investment that about exactly how to finance it.”…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sheridan Titman McCombs School of Business Department of Finance University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712-1179. Sergey Tsyplakov Moore School of Business Department of Finance University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208…

    • 24563 Words
    • 99 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the period section shows, the operation of capital markets does not match the assumptions underlying perfect competition but instead is characterized by market imperfections that can create capital availability gaps. Despite the united states well developed capital markets, a firm’s location, industry, amount and form of capital needed and the number and type of financial institutions serving its area can all affect its access to capital. Nonetheless, some common capital markets imperfection first, equity capital in amount below several million dollars is not available from public markets and institutional sources. Moreover, for small and early stage firms, equity capital is largely limited to firms in “hot” industries with perceived high growth potential. Second, debt capital for small firms and in amounts below several million dollars in largely available from private financial institutions. Thus, debt availability is dependent on competition and lending polices within the local banking and commercial finance market. Small business and real estates loan below $50,000 are not available from private financial institutions in most markets and in some cases the threshold may be higher furthermore, regulatory policies, cyclical economic conditions and limited competition all affect the cost and availability of debt. Several implications for economic development finance practice emerge from this analysis.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economic Paper

    • 8751 Words
    • 36 Pages

    6. B. GRAHAM and L. DODD, Security Analysis, 3rd ed. New York 1951. 7. G. GUTHMANN and H. E. DOUGALL, CorporateFinancial Policy, 3rd ed. New York 1955. 8. J. R. HICKS, Value and Capital, 2nd ed. Oxford 1946. 9. P. UIUNT and M. WILLIAMS, Case Problems in Finance, rev. ed. Homewood, Ill. 1954. 10. J. M. KEYNES, The Genzeral Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York 1936. 11. 0. LANGE, Price Flexibility and Employment. Bloomington, Ind. 1944. 12. J. LINTNER, "Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings and Taxes," Am.. Econ. Rev., Mfay1956, 46, 97-113. 13. F. LUTZand V". LUTZ, The Theory of Investment of the Firm. Princeton 1951. 14. F. MODIGLIANI and M. ZEMAN, "The Effect of the Availability of Funds, and the Terms Thereof, on Business Investment" in Nat. Bur. Econ. Research, Conference on Research in Business Finance. New York 1952, pp. 263-309. 15. WV. MORTON, "The Structure of the Capital Market and the Price of A. Money," Am. Econ. Rev., May 1954, 44, 440-54. 16. S. M. ROBBINS, Managing Securities. Boston 1954. 17. H. V. ROBERTS, "Current Problems in the Economics of Capital Budgeting," Jour. Bus., 1957, 30 (1), 12-16. 18. D. T. SMITH, Effects of Taxation on CorporateFiniancial Policy. Boston 1952. 19. R. SMITH, "Cost of Capital in the Oil Industry," (hectograph). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Inst. Tech. 1955. 20. H. M. SOMERS, " 'Cost of MAoney ' as the Determinant of Public Utility Rates," Buffalo Law Rev., Spring 1955, 4, 1-28. 21. J. B. WILLIAMS, The Theory of Investment Value. Cambridge, Mass. 1938. 22. U. S. Federal Communicatiolns Commission, The Problem of the "Rate of Return" in Public Utility Regulation. Washington 1938.…

    • 8751 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays