Han and Rome were two great empires that had similarities and differences. Han and Rome at a similar decline because of the lack of a stable economy. The different political systems caused Han and Rome to rise differently.
Both Han and Rome suffered similar economic failures towards the decline of the empires. Both empires suffered from Germanic invasions. Because of the lack of stable leadership, the empires were unable to unite to fight against the Germanic invasions. The leaders began to create higher taxes to pay for military defenses. As a result the economy failed and ultimately caused empires' decline.
Though both empires had similar causes for declines, they had different political systems that caused the empires to rise to power. The Han dynasty was built on Legalism, while the Roman empire was built on a republic government. Legalism consisted of strict obedience of the equally applied law, which kept everyone, no matter political, economic or social status, in check. Because the system of the law ran the state, it created a stable political system even when the ruler was weak. Under legalism, success became based on skill and not contacts, so there were more qualified people in office. In the Roman Republic government, the Assembly (the common man) voted each year to elect two new members of the Senate ( the noble and wealthy man). This created a separation of powers that kept internal conflicts at bay. This allowed for Rome to focus more on expansions.
Even though Han and Rome were hundreds of miles away from each other, they declined similarly because of economic instability, and they had different political systems that caused them to rise differently
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
While European Rome and Asian Han Dynasty China were unique civilizations in their own ways, they did happen to share a lot of qualities between each other. A couple of the similarities were their monarchy-run governments - both placed a single person (an emperor) in charge of the respective empire, both of them had were originally made up of many different kingdoms in their countries with one ending up controlling the rest, they both used lots of agriculture in their economies, and both Rome and Han China gradually deteriorated after long rules.…
- 180 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. Germanic tribes attacked the Romans and the Huns attacked Han China. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them.…
- 315 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many major similarities of the collapse are Rome and the Han empire such as they were both invaded by foreign enemies, the corruption of the governments, and the weak leaders. There are also many differences between the collapse of the Roman and Han empires such as, the Roman empire fell because of Germanic invasions, and the Civil Wars. The Han empire fell because, power was not held by the central government, and uprisings of desperate peasants.…
- 308 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…
- 282 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
During the classical period, many civilizations and large land bases were formed. Of these many civilizations, two main ones were Han China and Imperial Rome. Although Han China and Imperial Rome both had similar government structures and trading systems, they both had two very different militaries.…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though both the Chinese and Roman Empires were huge, wealthy, and powerful, they both had tragic falls. China was destroyed by nomadic invaders, a lack of army, and the influence of Buddhism. Rome, on the other hand was ruined by attacks by other civilizations, the loss of productive members of society, and the influence of Christianity. Both empires suffered from similar ideas, such as religion, or a lack of military, but each idea impacted them in different ways. Though the Chinese and Roman Empire were truly remarkable, like many other ancient empires, they had a devastating…
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays