Morals Monopolize Malevolence
In William Shakespeare’s famous play Hamlet, Hamlet’s moral nature is ultimately the reason why the Prince is unable to avenge his father’s death. Throughout the play, Hamlet is overwhelmed by his need to act on his father’s death but hesitates in the murder of Claudius due to his righteous views. Moral relativism, procrastination and indecisiveness are the three most important aspects of the Danish Prince’s moral nature which holds him back on dispatching Claudius.
During the course of the play, Hamlet shows his religious virtues and thus plays an immense role in seeking revenge for his father. While rambling on about vengeance, the senseless prince Hamlet utters “I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven. O, this is hire and salary, not revenge… or about some act that has no relish of salvation in’t; then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven, and that his soul may be as damn’d and black” (3.3.77-95). This soliloquy is significant as it shows Hamlet’s intentions when he must delay his murder purposes to a specific time frame where Claudius is acting corrupt because then the King’s soul will descend into hell. Moral relativism is also evident when the melancholic prince moans “To be, or not to be: that is the question; whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer… To die, to sleep;” when contemplating life and death (3.1.57-61). This unique proclamation further explains why Hamlet is incapable of murder because he is afraid of what lies after death, particularly hell and purgatory. For these reasons, religion is a main virtue of Hamlet’s moral nature leading his incompetence in seeking retribution on King Claudius.
Another unambiguous quality in the Prince’s moral nature that leads to the dispose of Claudius is procrastination. While in the castle, the insane Dane Hamlet sadly proclaims “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, and thus the native hue of resolution is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document