Preview

Habeas Corpus and the on War on Terror

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus and the on War on Terror
Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror 1

Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
Heather Ruggles
POL201 American National Government
Instructor Denise Greaves
April 7, 2013

Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror 2
The history of Habeas Corpus and the war on Terror Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty we have enjoyed as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, questions have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus and have been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal libers guaranteed by our Constitution and cannot be suspended based on that fact. In this paper I will be diving in to the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has evolved over the years. I will briefly explain the origination of the habeas corpus, the role it plays in U.S.A and what current action is being taken about it. I will be also looking in to the Bush administration and the way they dealt with habeas corpus.
History
The history of Habeas Corpus is ancient. It appears to be predominately of Anglo-Saxon common law origin, although the precise origin of Habeas Corpus is uncertain. Its principle effect was achieved in the middle ages by use of similar laws, the sum of which helped to mold our current policies. Habeas Corpus has since the earliest times been employed to compel the appearance of a person


References: JACKSON, A. L. (2010). HABEAS CORPUS IN THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR: AN AMERICAN DRAMA. Air Force Law Review, 65263-288. obban, M., & Halliday, P. D. (2011). Habeas corpus: From England to empire. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(2), 257-269. doi: 10.1017/S1744552311000085 BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 30 January 2013. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007 06 1195 Staab, J. B. (2008). The war on terror 's impact on habeas corpus: The constitutionality of the military commission’s act of 2006. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, (8), 280-297. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213962970?accountid=32521 Pond, B. C. (2009). Boumediene v. bush: Habeas corpus, exhaustion, and the special circumstances exception. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2009(6), 1907-1933. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194363601?accountid=32521 Robertson.J. (2002). Habeas corpus the most extraordinary writ. Center for the Preservation of Habeas corpus, Retrieved from: http://www.habeascorpus.net/asp/ Anderson, K. (2006). Law and terror. Policy Review, (139), 3-24. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216453983?accountid=32521
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld

    Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention, the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two months before September 11th and could have not received military training. The Special Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michael Mobbs, issued a response, outlining the Government’s position. The district court found the “Mobbs Declaration” insufficient in supporting the Government’s case. The Mobbs Declaration provided details regarding Hamdi’s trip to Afghanistan, his affiliation with the Taliban during a time when the Taliban was battling U.S. allies, and lastly his surrender of an assault rifle. The District Court found that the Mobbs Declaration, standing alone, did not support Hamdi’s detention and ordered the Government to turn over numerous materials. The Fourth Circuit reversed, stressing that it was undisputed that Hamdi was captured in an active combat zone, no factual inquiry or evidentiary hearing allowed Hamdi to be heard or to rebut the Government’s claims were necessary or proper. If the Mobbs Declaration was accurate, it provided a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that the President had constitutionally detained Hamdi, the court ordered the habeas petition dismissed. The appeals court held that, “no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress”. This provides that The AUMF’s “necessary and appropriate force” language provided the authorization for Hamdi’s detention. Also that Hamdi is entitled only to a limited judicial inquiry into his detention’s rationality under…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Entire Course

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Magna Carta Influence The American Government
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Magna Carta Influence The American Government

    Habeas corpus: Prisoners often seek release by filing a petition for a writ of habeas…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Slavery in the U.S. and the Dred Scott Decision
    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Slavery in the U.S. and the Dred Scott Decision

    [ 2 ]. Melvin Urofsky, and Paul Finkelman. Documents of American Constitutional & Legal History.(New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 419.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper
    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    POL 201 Final Paper

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    S. G. F. (September, 1888). The Suspension of Habeas Corpus During the War of the Rebellion. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rights In An Insecure World
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rights In An Insecure World

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties History
    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Civil Liberties History

    Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay

    Habeas Corpus has been a part of our history for many years. It has been used only when the feel the need to use it and also it has been suspended by two of our former president. Habeas Corpus “is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee (e.g. institutionalized mental patient) before the court to determine if the person 's imprisonment or detention is lawful. In the US system, federal courts can use the writ of habeas corpus to determine if a state 's detention of a prisoner is valid.”(Cornell University Law School, 2010). In this essay I will discuss the historical evolution of habeas corpus, U.S. history of the suspension of habeas corpus, U.S. Supreme Court 's interpretation of the right of habeas corpus, and four perspectives on the Habeas Corpus.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Right of Habeas Corpus
    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Right of Habeas Corpus

    The Right of Habeas Corpus is derived from the Latin meaning “you have the body. The meaning according to the U.S. Constitution is the right of any person to question their incarceration before a judge. The violating of this right has not been the most severe of the civil liberties granted to not only Americans but many other countries. The biggest violation of this right was when the Busch administration held hundreds of suspected terrorist from the Afghan and Iraqi terror attacks of 9/11. The first real act of Habeas Corpus comes from the passage of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 through 1915. At that time the court denied Leo Frank this right during a murder trial. Some other interesting evolutions of this act throughout history are Lincoln 's Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus this was a historical moment for this right of the constitution. “Lincoln 's power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus was extensively explored during the Civil War, but since then his suspensions have escaped detailed scrutiny despite the controversy they provoked, their widespread and effective use to combat malignant opposition to the war, and their uncertain grounding in the Constitution.” Under the Constitution the federal government can unquestionably suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus if the public safety requires it during times of rebellion or invasion. The issue is whether Congress or the president holds this power. I think this is why during the 9/11 attacks President Bush felt he could detain all those people because of this right.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Habeas Corpus
    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Habeas Corpus

    Let’s look at the history of habeas corpus it stated in an article entitled Habeas Corpus The most extraordinary writ that the history of “Habeas Corpus is ancient”. “Although the precise origin of Habeas Corpus is uncertain of its antiquity” (Robertson, J. 2008). The primary effects were achieved during the middle ages by the use of a variety of writs, which gave a comparable effect as the modern writ and current policies. It also stated that “the practice surrounding the writ has evolved over time” (Robertson, J. 2008, para. 2). Since the earliest of times the Habeas Corpus was designed to bring forth any person in custody be brought before the court. While the Habeas Corpus was originally the privilege writ of a King and his courts, over the course of hundreds of years’ time has allowed it to evolve into a privilege for the person being…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics