Preview

Guns Germs and Steel Packet

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guns Germs and Steel Packet
Name: __________________________

World History
Unit Two: Global Inequality

An Overview of Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel

Why do some nations have so much material wealth while so many others have so little?

This was the question Jared Diamond posed in his book Guns, Germs, and Steel. After identifying a point in time when all societies were roughly equal (over 13,000 years ago), Diamond identified the key variables that allowed some societies to develop highly complex, material-rich societies, while others developed at much slower rates.

Guns, Germs, and Steel uncovers how Europeans came to dominate every other group on the planet by virtue of their access to what Diamond terms the “Agents of Conquest”:

Guns, Germs, and Steel.

Jared Diamond’s journey of discovery began on the island of Papua, New Guinea. There, in 1974, a local named Yali asked Diamond a deceptively simple question:

"Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo (material goods), but we black people had little cargo (material goods) of our own?"

Diamond realized that Yali's question penetrated the heart of a great mystery of human history -- the roots of global inequality.

Why were Europeans the ones with all the cargo? Why had they taken over so much of the world, instead of the native people of New Guinea? How did Europeans end up with what Diamond terms the Agents of Conquest: Guns, Germs and Steel?

It was these agents of conquest that allowed 168 Spanish conquistadors to defeat an Imperial Inca army of 80,000 in 1532, and set a pattern of European conquest which would continue up to the present day.

Diamond knew that the answer had little to do with ingenuity or individual skill. From his own experience in the jungles of New Guinea, he had observed that native hunter-gatherers were just as intelligent as people of European descent -- and far more resourceful. Their lives were tough, and it seemed a terrible paradox of history that these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jared Diamond’s speech focuses on the fact that Europeans conquered the New World, Africa, and Australia before they could get to Europe thanks to the domestication of plants and animals, which sped up the rate of the development of civilization.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Econ 515

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Explain briefly how guns and steel aided in Europeans’ attempts to conquer the native population of Africa and the Americas. How did germs work in favor of European conquest against the Incas? How did germs work against the Europeans in their imperialist efforts in Africa?…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond is the response to a question Diamond had been asked by a New Guinean politician, Yali, in 1972. The question was, “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people have little cargo of our own?” This refers to the inequality between many different civilizations, quite like how Europeans developed great objects and wealth that they used to dominate over other societies. Diamond begins to wonder why that is, “Why did human development proceed at different rates on different continents?” Before explaining possible answers, Diamond clarifies that his book isn’t to justify European domination of other civilizations nor does the answer take a European historic approach. Diamond also clarifies that hunter-gatherer civilizations are not inferior to agricultural or industrial civilizations.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, Guns, Germs and Steel, written by Jared Diamond, is an argument about how and why things happened differently in history in different continents. It’s about looking deeper into why things happened the way they did. Why did western Eurasian societies become more powerful? What enabled these parts of the world to develop more quickly and in turn be able to conquer less developed societies around the world? The important message to grasp from this article is not about how certain continents or areas becoming developed quicker, but why those specific areas were the ones to develop quicker. An example of this that Diamond discusses, is how New Guineans were still living in the “Stone Age” 200 years ago when Europeans came to New Guinea with materials (called cargo) that were very valued. The question was, why did the people of New Guinea have a scarce amount of cargo when the white Europeans had so much of it? (page 14)…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A central factor for the Inca expansion and ruling was how they conquered…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the beginning, the Europeans had an advantage over the Native Americans. They had the horses and the guns. Guns played a major role in the success of the Europeans. Guns not only aided in overthrowing the Native Americans, but also aided in keeping the Europeans alive by allowing them to hunt and gather food. Horses also played a huge role. They made battle and travel easier.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A: On the event of November 16, 1532 conquistador Francisco Pizarro and his army of only 168 men more than attacked the Inca town of Cajamarca, populating about 80,000 people. They…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Germs Steels Papers

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this video, Guns, germs, and steel are a fascinating perspective taken by Professor of Geography and Physiology at UCLA, Jared Diamond. His purpose was to explain why Eurasian civilizations have had such immense success conquering people and land other than their own. Why Europeans were the ones to conquer the world? As Diamond states that questions asked based on guns, germs, and steel are the biggest, most fascinating questions of human history. Guns, germs, and steel are the biggest, most fascinating questions of human history. He has developed a theory about what has caused these huge discrepancies among different countries, and he says it boils down to geographic luck. When Yali, a New Guinean posed the question of why white men have so much cargo and New Guineans like him have so little, Diamond was thrown off balance on how to answer it. Cargo was regarded by many as the white man’s power. Western colonials believed power was determined by race. They felt they were superior to the native population and that it was natural for them to have so much cargo and the New Guineans so little. Diamond makes the argument that race is an absurd explanation, because he knew too many smart New Guineans that possessed skillful methods. They could survive in some of the most difficult environments on earth empty handed and still survive. Essentially, it had much to do with one’s geographic surroundings, and what that group was exposed to. Hunter gatherers traveled in small mobile groups. They made shelters where they could find animals to hunt or plants to gather. They lived in shelters for weeks or months at a time as long as they had food for themselves. Once the season changed and animals migrated, they moved on to the next valley looking for new sources of food. In parts of New Guinea, wild sago is an important food source. Women would strip the sago trees to get to the pulp in the…

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1500s 80,000 Inca were defeated by only 168 Spaniards, but how? The long term effect on the Inca defeat was the Spanish technology compared to the Inca technology. The Spanish conquistadores had developed guns, they also made steel swords where the Inca had only bronze weapons, the Spanish also had developed a written language while the Inca people had never even seen a book. Spain and all the rest of Europe had developed the plow and other farming techniques such as attaching the plow to animals. This use of animals also gave the Spanish an advantage because they soon became immune to livestock born diseases which they brought upon the Inca. All of these advantages gave the Spanish the upper hand in the fight with the Incas.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    _Myths of the Spanish Conquest_ is broken into seven chapters, each dedicated to a different myth or mis-conception regarding the Spanish conquest. In debunking these myths, Matthew Restall works with three themes regarding the conquest. First, that the European discovery of the Americas was one of the greatest events in human history. Second, that the conquest was the achievement of "a few great men," which he subsequently describes as "a handful of adventurers." These two themes lead to a third theme, or question. "If history's greatest event - the European discovery and conquest of the Americas - was achieved by a mere "handful of adventurers," how did they do it?"…

    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jared Diamond Gea Essay

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jared Diamond is a biologist whose area of expertise is birds. His studies took him to Papua New Guinea, where he utilized his skills to study all of the bird species inhabiting the island. One day, a PNG inhabitant, Yali, came up and asked Diamond a question: “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo, but we black people had little cargo of our own?” Diamond argues that the answer to Yali’s question wasn’t racial inequality like so many people assume it is. Diamond began his research by going back in time to the earliest civilizations. Upon studying about the ancient civilizations of the world, Diamond found an answer to Yali’s question. Diamond’s argument was that racial inequality had no influence whatsoever on the amount of cargo that Papua New Guinea had compared to Europe or the Americas. Varying factors such as geographic differences (or “geographic luck”) come into play when answering Yali’s question. Depending on the location of each ancient civilization, Depending on the location of each ancient civilization, two other factors came into play; the making of well-developed agriculture systems and crops, and the successful domestication of specific animals also play into the prosperity of civilizations in ancient times.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.Jarod Diamond went to cover roots of why the world became inequal.He wanted to find what “separates the have nots from the nots.”He spent more than 40 years researching.This took place in the rainforests of Papua, New Guinea.He wanted to know how Europeans developed advantages.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exterminate All the Brutes

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The British were able to conquer 1/3 of the world through their impeccable military strength. The British were masters of the sea; steam boats were used all over the world to carry arms up rivers effectively (pg.48). The British were able to go up into the heart of a continent in search for raw materials or indigenous populations to enslave. The British had the largest colonial conquests ever experienced. The atrocities committed in the name of colonial expansion and imperialism was often justified by superiority military and biologically. With the race of colonial conquest developed the race of arms. The British built and changed the paper cartridge of bullets to brass, making the bullet faster and go further (pg.49). Each European colonial empire had their own gun which would kill accurately and effectively any opponent of the third world. Eventually guns were perfected and early into the colonial era they had developed automatic weapons (pg.49). Theoretically they could subject anyone to their rule, backed by fire power. The indigenous nations did not have such technological advancements therefore didn’t stand a chance against the steel and firepower of the European empires. The Empires felt that this lack of technology was a lack of…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unquestionable, but Diamond has given it too much weight to a subject that has multiple causes, many of which cannot be accounted for by the physical environment. By comparing the work of other writers on the subject and engaging in a detailed examination of cultural factors, I highlight the flaws in Diamond’s work as a comprehensive account of world history and inequality. Three important issues need addressing before I begin this essay. First, the definition of inequality used here is that of the disparity between regions. It is duly noted that the term can be defined in a number of different ways, and that dimensions such as intra-national inequality can contribute to the economic performance of a nation, but it is perhaps more important to assess Diamond’s claims under his…

    • 6633 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Makes A Nation Rich

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    MIT economist Daron Acemoglu considered why some nations thrive economically while others do not in an article in Esquire magazine. Asking what makes a nation rich he pondered on why some nations as in the United States are well developed and have better standards of living than many countries in Africa, South Asia, South America, and around the world. He argues that inequality is not predetermined, nations are not created poor or rich but that their governments make them the way they are. He covers some of the theories behind why some nations are poor as in their relative geography and weather. People have concluded that in the poorer parts of the world nutrient starved soil makes agriculture a challenge and that tropical climates foment disease. He discusses another theory that poor nations lack the technology to be successful. Although these theories work for some cases, Acemoglu argues against them all believing the reason a nation becomes and stays poor is that they ignore incentives. He states that people need incentives to invest and prosper, basically people need to know that if they work hard they can make money and be able to keep what is rightfully theirs.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays