Preview

Gulliver’s Travels and Historical England

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2139 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gulliver’s Travels and Historical England
01 December 2011
Gulliver’s Travels and Historical England
Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift is a famous, classic novel that satirized many aspects of government, religion and human nature. Written in the eighteenth century, this three-hundred-year-old novel remains well known today because of its timeless criticism that can still be applied to contemporary politics and religious faiths. In eighteenth century England, the home of both Swift and his character Lemuel Gulliver, the ruling constitutional monarchy was made up of two governing bodies, the monarch and his or her personal advisors, and the English Parliament, the members of which were elected by the people. Though this may have seemed like a well structured government, it was in fact deeply flawed and had many illogical systems. England was also Protestant at the time, where the church had significant influence in the nation, and even started wars against their Catholic neighbour, France. Arguably, the religious system of England acted very unreasonably and contradictory to its own ideals, including keeping peace. Swift, the creator of this novel, was not only an author, but also an English politician and a Protestant priest. This made him very qualified to make judgments about England, and offers a reason why his satires can be used as evidence against eighteenth century England. Swift wrote these satires due to his disappointment with certain aspects of England. Through the numerous adventures and satires found in Gulliver’s Travels, Swift proves how England during the eighteenth century had an illogical government system, specifically a constitutional monarchy, as well a flawed religious system. The first fault of the English’s constitutional monarchy is found within their method of choosing successors. The King or Queen of England is selected through family ties. The son or daughter of the ruling monarch ascends to the throne once the current monarch dies. The problem with monarchies is that



Cited: Swift, Jonathan. Gulliver’s Travels. 1726. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2006. Print. Grego, Joseph “Peace on Earth.” vatican.ca. Holy See. Web. 25 Nov. 2011. “George I (1660-1727).” bbc.co.uk. British Broadcasting Corporation. Web. 20 Nov. 2011. “The Age of Religious Wars (c.1560-98).” flowofhistory.com. Web. 20 Nov. 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The adult reader can easily identify with the ludicrousness of the scene. Politics, rationality and morality do not seem to be compatible in Lilliput. “The Role of Gulliver” by John Brooks Moore argues that “Swift, obviously enough, desires to communicate his own thoughts and passions regarding human beings to the readers of his book” (451). Moore feels that Gulliver is the medium through which Swift is able to comment on the Lilliputian systems of government and electoral processes as a method of commenting on real life scenarios of the same…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Swift effectively satirizes the political situation in which he shines light on England’s unconcerned attitude towards the poor Irish natives. His work contains depth as it depicts Ireland’s submissive condition in the 18th century. Although Swift’s proposals presented to, alleviate Ireland’s poverty, are highly unsettling, a deeper analysis of the effectively expounded satire helps understand both the dwindling political climate of the time and the aim to improve, overcome, and…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this essay is to demonstrate how eighteenth-century texts are engaged with political radicalism of that era. For this purpose, I will focus on two writers who have the same background but different styles: Swift (political pamphleteer, poet and novelist) and John Gay (English poet and dramatist). First, I would like to introduce Gulliver’s Travels written by Jonathan Swift. Moreover, I would like to provide and analyse some passages from the first part of Gulliver’s Travel: ‘A Voyage to Lilliput’ in order to reflect political radicalism through satire, descriptions of characters, humour and mockeries. Secondly, I would like to introduce and expose John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera on the whole in order to demonstrate that political radicalism differs from Gulliver`s Travel satirizing Robert Walpole’s figure. However, before making reference to the previous two points I will explain briefly the meaning of ‘political radicalism’ and comment on the background of the eighteenth-century period in England in order to have a good understanding of the writings of these two authors.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A child born in the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, at the end of the year 1600, was to inherit this hitherto unquestioned office, and apparently to inherit it undiminished in reputation or effect. He was to come to the kingship of his fathers in true descent of the Blood Royal, and , destined as it would seem, to administer as those before him had administered and to hand on this same power and majesty to his posterity. Yet in the lifetime of that child- and it was not a long one, monarchy in England crumbled, or rather was destroyed. He himself acted that tragedy and took the tragic part therein. First he was thwarted by his more powerful subjects through his early years, from the day when as a young man of twenty-five he came to his own when he had not long passed his fortieth year. They gradually destroyed his national forces, they triumphed over him, they belittle him by one humiliation after another, and at last, before he had reached his fiftieth year, they put him to death. With him died the English monarchy- he was the last ruling King of England, the last who goverened as Kings had goverened for untold years. His virtues destroyed the Crown of England and the power thereof.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Not So Modest Proposal

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our society, satire is among the most prevalent of comedic forms. This was not always true, for before the 18th century, satire was not a fully developed form. Satire, however, rose out of necessity; writers and artists needed a way to ambiguously criticize their governments, their churches, and their aristocrats. By the 18th century, satire was hugely popular. Satire as an art form has its roots in the classics, especially in the Roman Horace's Satires. Satire as it was originally proposed was a form of literature using sarcasm, irony, and wit, to bring about a change in society, but in the eighteenth century Voltaire, Jonathan Swift and William Hogarth expanded satire to include politics, as well as art. The political climate of the time was one of tension. Any criticism of government would bring harsh punishments, sometimes exile or death. In order to voice opinions without fear of punishment, malcontented writers turned to Satire. Voltaire's Candide and Swift's Modest Proposal are two examples of this new genre. By creating a fictional world modeled after the world he hated, Voltaire was able to attack scientists, and theologians with impunity. Jonathan Swift created many fictional worlds in his great work, Gulliver's Travels, when he constantly drew parallels to the English government.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paine stresses that, “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever,”. Government is supposed to be a representative of its people whose purpose is to serve their interests and not ones’ own self-interest. However, the monarchy continuously supports its interest through reining kings and queens who have direct family relationships. This suggests that nothing will change because those in power will continue to govern according to their ancestors. “To the evil of monarchy we have added that of hereditary succession; and as the first is a degradation and lessening of ourselves, so the second, claimed as a matter of right, is an insult and an imposition on posterity.”…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Swift’s ‘Gulliver’s Travel’ and Voltaire’s ‘Candide’ are typical literature works during the Enlightenment period. Both authors use satire in their works. Satire is literary form which means irony. Therefore, they have some similarities. They both want to expose human vices through satiric tone. Due to different personal styles, there are many differences between two novels.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the separate branches; legislative, executive and judicial, holds members that were either elected or appointed by the Prime Minister (Martin 2). The only one not to comply to this is the Queen herself. The constitutional monarchy is based on the ancient form of authority that not only prevents the leader from being chosen fairly, it also prevents the opportunity to remove an unsuitable one. Other than death or dethroning, there is no concrete way to dismiss a royal figure from their standing, with the current laws of the throne. Compared to the other members of the government, which are given a chance to be replaced in the quadrennial elections or in the case of a Member of Parliament, by a by-election (“By-elections” 1), the sovereign can’t be reinstated by someone else. Regardless of the circumstance, laws have been put in place as a way to protect the citizens from the chance of a person of power exploiting it. These laws don’t apply to the Monarchy. Many say that Queen Victoria is a crucial figure in our past, which is true, but they don’t acknowledge the vast amount of Royals who have abused their power rather than using it for good. Numerous examples can be found throughout history, all because of the uncertainty that comes with having a self-proclaimed leader, that can’t be removed by the citizens (Barksdale 1). Clearly, the monarchy is an unfit and potentially dangerous form of government, and shouldn’t be continued in this country, which can be sustained without…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Britain Government

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Government of UK. "History of the Monarchy." History of the Monarchy. Official Website of the English Monarchy, n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. .…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics earn Swift’s greatest critical disapprobation. Through his supposed character's observations, Swift levels an indifferent screed against the pettiness of politics and its degrading nature on the human spirit. He does this by focusing on the monarchy and parliaments of the nations he has created. During the voyages to Lilliput and Brobdingnag, Swift devotes whole passages explicating their political and social customs. These passages serve a satirical purpose by pointing out how petty and ridiculous politics can often be. For instance, in Lilliput, political parties are distinguished by the height of each party member's boot heels. The very serious matter of war is given to childish pettiness. The Lilliputians maintain a longstanding feud with the Blefuscians, neighbors from that "other great empire of the universe" (Swift 74) over how to properly crack an egg, which, for them, has achieved great ideological significance. The reader, for who the narrator acts as eyes and ears to the interesting universes he encounters, is meant to find these social and political customs silly. But there is serious business involved in these passages. Here Swift is satirizing European political values and the arrogance with which Europeans regard their particular form of authority and beliefs.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The British Monarchy

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. THE BRITISH MONARCHY IS AN OUTDATED GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE THAT HAS NO PLACE IN THE MODERN WORLD…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathon Swift, Gulliver continually proves how he is playing the role of a mock-hero. As many of the classic heroes hold traits such as bravery, intelligence, and leadership, Gulliver’s character pokes fun at that classic idea. Many epics consist of great heroes going on treacherous journeys where they come across man-eating beasts or other large feats, where as in Gulliver’s Travels, he goes on a journey where he doesn’t have to overcome any great obstacles or fight for his survival. The satirical nature of the story begins right at the start of the tale when the narrator begins to explain the character of Gulliver and the qualities he posses. From that point forward the mock-heroic style of writing has begun and his journey across the sea can be compared to epic journeys such as Odysseus’, and all the life threatening obstacles he must overcome. Once the journey is even complete, their returns to their home are even comparable in a satirical manor. The theme of Gulliver being portrayed as a mock-hero can be traced throughout the entirety of the story.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Jonathan Swift’s satire, “Gulliver’s Travels”, the representation of women can be seen, at a superficial level, as offensive and extremely misogynistic and in broad lines corresponding to the image of the woman in Swift’s contemporary patriarchal society. The woman was almost objectified, thus reduced to her physical appearance and its status as obedient wife, whose sole purpose was to attend to her husband’s need. This perception of women was what triggered the emerging feminist movement. With pioneers as Mary Wollstonecraft with her XVIIIth century “A Vindication of the Rights of Women”, the philosophy of feminism has reached its peak in the XXth century, starting with Simone de Beauvoir’s “The Second Sex”. Using a parallel between Mary Wollstonecraft and Simone de Beauvoir’s concepts of the image of the woman in canonical thinking, the aim of this essay is to discuss feminine representations in Gulliver’s Travels and the way in which Swift’s view of the nature of women coincided or not with the existing ones in his contemporary society. In this manner, we can conclude that perceiving Swift as a fierce misogynist is rather a hasty conclusion and, in fact, he used his masterpiece as a way of emphasising the wrong perception and cultivation of the female nature in the Augustan Age. Published as Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World, in Four Parts; by Lemuel Gulliver in 1726, Gulliver's Travels is a satire against the Augustan society, focusing its tirade on institutions such as government, arts, education and individuals alike. His vehemence in illustrating each of the book’s sections has lead to the conception that Swift is a misanthropist and a misogynist in particular, given the fact that he often used women to illustrate the most appalling aspects of human decadence. Nevertheless, taking into account the fact that being both a convinced religious man (he was an Anglican clergyman) and a humanist (he…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British Monarchy

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The British royal family has had many reasons to celebrate since April 2011. Not only did it have, not one, but two royal weddings, in addition its popularity previously hit by the Diana crisis, seems to have been finally restored. Indeed, the wedding of Prince William and Miss Middleton has produced a happy end to the old feud between “The People’s Princess” and the royal establishment. It was this occasion that allowed the British public to make their peace with the past and indulge in this romantic celebration of a British fairy tale. Nevertheless, and even amidst the countdown to the royal wedding, concerns about the role of the institution of British monarchy continued to be heard. We are, therefore, going to try to deal with the question of whether such an institution is still relevant in the 21st century. In order to answer this question, we shall first discuss the arguments disparaging the British royal family, then we shall look at the arguments appraising it, and last but not least we shall analyse the special status of the British monarch-not as a tyrant, but as the guardian of British constitutional democracy.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays