Guideline for Article Review

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 158
  • Published : January 28, 2011
Open Document
Text Preview
Outline of the Article Review

Please include the following categories in your article review. 1. Full Bibliographic Reference (-3 if missing)
2. Introduction: Objectives, Article Domain, Audience, Journal and Conceptual/Emprical Classification (8) 3. Very Brief Summary (4)
4. Results (8)
5. Class Readings (4)
6. Contributions (8)
7. Foundation (4)
8. Synthesis with Class Materials (12 +8 extra credit)
9. Analysis & Additional Analysis (4 +8 extra credit)
10. General Critique (10 + 6 extra credit)
11. Further Critique of a Conceptual Article -or- (12)
Further Critique of an Empirical Article (12+2 extra credit) 12. Issues (listed by the author) (6+3 extra credit)
13. Issues (in your opinion) (6+6 extra credit)
14. Impact (9)
15. Questions (6)
16. Annotated Bibliography (-5 if missing)
17. Citation Analysis Appendix (6)
In addition, you can lose points if your review is too short or poorly edited. See the Grading Notes section above.

1. Full Bibliographic Reference

State the full bibliographic reference for the article you are reviewing (authors, title, journal name, volume, issue, year, page numbers, etc.) Important: this is not the bibliography listed at the end of the article, rather the citation of the article itself! Grading: -3 if missing

2. Introduction: Objectives, Article Domain, Audience, Journal and Conceptual/Emprical Classification

Note: For the on-line reviews done in some class sections, this category may be broken up into several separate subcategories. For the written review, please discuss all of these subcategories together as follows. Paragraph 1: State the objectives (goals or purpose) of the article. What is the article's domain (topic area)? Paragraph 2:

• Audience: State the article's intended audience. At what level is it written, and what general background should the reader have; what general background materials should the reader be familiar with to understand the article? • Appropriate Journal?: Why is the journal appropriate (or inappropriate) for this article? (Check the mission statement or purpose of the journal itself from its cover or its Web site.) Paragraph 3: State whether the article is "conceptual" or "empirical", and why you believe it is conceptual or empirical. Empirical articles and conceptual articles have a similar objective: to substantiate an argument proposed by the author. While a conceptual article supports such an argument based on logical and persuasive reasoning, an empirical article offers empirical evidence to support the argument. Empirical articles offer substantial, detailed evidence which the authors analyze using statistical methods. Empirical articles must include hypotheses (or propositions), detailed research results, and (statistical) analyses of this empirical evidence. Empirical research includes experiments, surveys, questionnaires, field studies, etc, and to limited degree, case studies. Conceptual articles may refer to such empirical evidence, but do not provide the detailed analysis of that evidence. Of course, both types of articles can use real life examples to back up their points. Just because an article provides examples, does not necessarily mean that it is empirical. (The lesson to take home is not to consider a conceptual article to be an empirical one just because it provides some summarized or some unanalyzed data.) Grading: Objectives: great - 3; ok - 2; poor - 1

Grading: Audience/Journal Appropriateness: great - 3; ok - 2; poor - 1 Grading: Conceptual vs. empirical: great - 2; ok/poor - 1

3. Very Brief Summary

For our article reviews, we do not want you to spend much space summarizing the article. Instead we are more interested in your analysis of the article. Thus, in this section, summarize the article only very briefly (2-3 paragraphs). If possible, use the IS research paradigm as the format of your summary, but remaining very brief: •...
tracking img