Group Identifiers, Stereotypes and Prejudices
More often than not, when someone stereotypes someone it is more negative than positive. A negative generalization to a racial group can however be thought of as positive through association. For Example, I’m not good at tennis and I’m terrible softball but some people think that all white people are good at both. I, by default, am thought to be normally good at softball and tennis simply by association. Stereotyping is usually not accurate and used in a sense to hurt someone’s feelings. It is a lack of understanding that we stereotype placing labels on someone. Stereotypes are a consequence of the way our brain logically puts things into categories and groups. The negative aspects of stereotypes are something you see and could be a false depiction of what is the standard. Most stereotypes are untrue. For Example, my mother and I cried when our pet of fifteen years passed away and my father showed no emotion what so ever. Therefore, females are far too sensitive and cannot control their emotions. It sounds absolutely ridiculous and I feel it is but unfortunately this is how stereotypes have become what they are. The four most common ways groups are identified is by race, ethnicity, religion, and gender. I truly believe we tend to stick with people who are similar to us and avoid those people who are different. I think it’s just comfortable to be among people who are like us, and identifying by similar traits; I think it provides a sense of belonging and community. When we avoid others who are different, we tend not to learn about them. When we don't really know what people are like, it's easy to make generalizations about them based on very limited knowledge or information about them. Those who are identified by race are socially set apart because of “obvious physical” differences. By obvious and physical differences, I mean things as simple as the hair color, the amount of body hair one has, etc. Each society...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document