Global Warming: The False Science and Political Influence Behind It
For nearly a decade the Global Warming hysteria has been sweeping the globe. With people going “green” and people worrying about how much they drive, humans are doing anything they can to save the world by releasing less carbon dioxide, but are we really killing the planet with carbon dioxide? I think not.
For nearly a decade now there has been a cry for help, a cry for change in humanity to stop humans from emitting carbon dioxide. According to a “large field of scientific consensus” and “scientific evidence” humans are spouting out carbon dioxide and according to scientists our carbon dioxide is causing the planet to heat at rapid and never before seen rates. Then causing the polar ice caps to melt and the world’s oceans to increase in size, and extend onto our land, inevitably causing the end of mankind. Ladies and gentlemen that is a load of garbage. In this essay I will show you many different reasons on how global warming is fake, a scam, politically driven, really has little scientific evidence backing it, and how the global warming movement has negatively affected our country, and our planet.
First off let’s start off with the political influence behind global warming. Almost every day that you turn on the television and watch a news channel, you will hear something on how global warming and manmade CO2 is causing a ruckus upon our planet, and how numerous of scientists are saying that we need to change our ways. That is just simply not true. Why won’t it just die down then if it is not true? Well let me explain.
The global warming hysteria has caused a huge shift of money and power. There are thousands of scientists that believe global warming is happening. Many of them get paid to research and find out what is causing global warming and ways we can fix it. Well if the whole global warming theory, (notice I use the word theory, because by technicality a theory is merely a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena, so it’s not completely true), was to be shot down and finally accepted as not actually happening then there would be thousands of scientists without jobs. So in order for those scientists to keep getting paid there has to be a problem, (in this case global warming). If global warming was completely nullified and accepted as not true then it would also affect everyone connected to it. Politicians who back global warming policies wouldn’t be getting money from multi-million dollar corporations backing it such as television networks, ABC and CBS to name a few.
In 2006 a movie called An Inconvenient Truth was released by Paramount Studios. It was a documentary about the so called “global warming theory” and our effect on the planet by emitting CO2. This film went on to win numerous awards, despite being filled with tons of false information. One of the big mistakes made by Al Gore in that movie was him stating that the Western part of the world is emitting carbon dioxide is causing the other countries who don’t have anything to do with global warming suffer terrible droughts, and harsh weather conditions. Yes, many other non-developed countries has been suffering from these terrible weather experiences for years, and we have been trying to help them, but the Democrats in congress and the house have constantly been shooting it down. Why might you ask? Well, see if we were to develop and industrialize in Africa for example, we would just push ourselves closer to the brink of the end of human civilization. Basically, instead of developing third world countries, and saving millions of lives by providing safe shelter, clean water, safe food, liberals and global warming theorists would rather sit back and let them suffer in the face of a false theory, in order to prove a point and kill the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document