Preview

Global Inequality Caused by Consumption

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
331 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Global Inequality Caused by Consumption
Core issue: consumption causes global inequality.

Global inequality is the inequality in distribution of income and wealth between rich and poor countries.

A concentration of wealth is in the hands of very small number of people.

A study by the World Institute for Development Economics Research at United Nations University reports that the richest 1% of adults alone owned 40% of global assets in the year 2000, and that the richest 10% of adults accounted for 85% of the world total. The bottom half of the world adult population owned barely 1% of global wealth.

According to the wealth concentration theory, those who already hold wealth have the means to invest in new sources of creating wealth or to otherwise leverage the accumulation of wealth, thus are the beneficiaries of the new wealth. Over time, wealth condensation can significantly contribute to the persistence of inequality within society.
This correlation between being rich and earning more is also contributed by plutocracy: the ability of the rich to influence government disproportionately to their favor thereby increasing their wealth. This unjust global trade regime as a primary cause in increasing global inequality

---------------
Wealth and poverty make life different in a host of ways. health, education, literacy, child labour, employment, gender, political participation, higher level in countries with higher income

Compare their economic productivity-->classify countries.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) & Gross National Income (GNI) The World Bank uses GNI per person to classify countries.

Low income (P559)
For example, workforces in China, much of which is well trained and educated and now receive extremely low wages-sometimes less than one-twentieth of what workers earn in comparable jobs in the developed countries.

These institutionalised inequalities result in greater marginalisation within society. The report emphasises the inevitable social disintegration,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stiglitz, Joseph. “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%” Vanity Fair May 2011.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over a 9-year period between 1989 and 1998, “[...] the proportion of net worth owned by the top 1 percent [...] rose from 30 percent to more than 34 percent [while...] those in the bottom 90 percent declined from 33 percent to just over 30 percent” (Ciment). Wealth is gradually shifting towards the few and affluent at the expense of the numerous poor due to the increased power of corporations and the rich. The rich and their corporations are able to influence the way money circulates, allowing more money to be diverted to them from the lower and middle classes. This creates the basis as to why the rich continue accumulating wealth while the rest of the populace loses it. Additionally, the rich earn money faster than everyone else, giving them an advantage after recessions.“93 per cent of the income gains in the first official year of economic recovery went to the top one per cent [in terms of wealth] in the US” (Jones). Despite the recent economic gains, most of the population is not benefited by them, with the rich having the largest gains. The poor and middle classes’ incomes remain stagnant or even decrease, highlighting the great disparity between the rich and everyone else. When economic gains are made, money only goes to certain groups, leaving others the same or worse…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stewart Ewen Chosen People

    • 2043 Words
    • 6 Pages

    SMITH, ANTHONY L. "The Super-Rich: The Unjust World of Global Capitalism."ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 18.2 (2001): 237-239.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People are described as “bad poor” because of their financial position and their failure to overcome it as shown in figure 1. However, that is easier said than done. Children who are born into poverty are already poor and they have no control over that. They have to work very hard with little assistance just to get to the point where a change can be made or an upgrade in class is possible. People of low class are generally regarded as less valuable or even disposable. They are the subject of much ridicule and prosecution due to their financial status. This sort of classification is attempt to be stabilize by welfare and other government money programs, but the taxpayers fund that, so the money is taken back away from them. Income inequality is one of the main causes of social segregation of…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In today’s capitalist economy, where economic transactions and business in general is centered on self-interest, there is a natural tendency for some people to make more than others. That is the basis for the “American Dream,” where people, if they worked hard, could make money proportional to their effort. However, what happens when this natural occurrence grows disproportional in its allocation of wealth within a society? The resulting issue becomes income inequality. Where a small portion of the population, own the majority of the wealth and the majority of the population own only a fraction of what the rich own. This prominent issue has always been the subject of social tension from even before the French Revolution and spawns numerous other social issues in a society. In the more recent Occupy Movement, beginning in 2011, protesters used income inequality as a motive. Moreover, they were justified in doing so. In a 2010 statistic, it was revealed that the top 1% of America, own 35% of the wealth while the lower 80%, over the majority of the population, only have 11% of the nation’s wealth distributed between them. Financially the situation is even worse where the bottom 80% own only 5% of the financial wealth and the top 1% own 42% of the Nation’s financial wealth. Not to say the top 1% didn’t work hard to get to where they are, but according to the ideals of the “American Dream,” the top 1% should have worked 243 times harder than the average, not the poorest, worker in America. This extreme of disproportional wealth distribution is not only a source of social conflict, but a catalyst for various other problems that exist.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Rich Are Different from You and Me,” author Chrystia Freeland explains the rising phenomenon of income inequality that is occurring between the richest top 10% and bottom 90% of the population. Chrystia Freeland states “In every society, some people are richer than others, but across time and geography, the gap between the rich and the rest has widely varied. The reality today is that the rich-especially the very, very rich- are vaulting ahead of everyone else” (51). Between the years of 2002 and 2007, income statistics show that the gap between the richest 10% and the bottom 90% of the population had significantly increased. Statistics also show that by 2007, approximately 35% of the wealth was maintained by the top 10%, leaving about 27% of wealth to the bottom 90% of the population. This is about an 8% gap in between. The last time income inequality was this high was in the 1920’s, but back then only 20% of wealth was gained from work. Today the top 10% gains at least 60% of their wealth from work, rather than inheritance. As economies throughout the world mature, income inequality will continue to rise. The gap between the rich and all others is primarily found in United States. Other countries such as Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are beginning to see income inequality as well. Freeland also states that “These global super- rich work and play together” (52). They share common interests such as business traveling, and vacationing around the world. Due to the common interests shared by others most like themselves, they have become separated from all others within the population, and have formed their own world governed by plutocracy. Author Chrystia Freeland is concerned that because the rich are so caught up in their world of wealth that they will not recognize that other…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the natural factor of privileged people and the undeniable fact that the distribution of wealth is…

    • 1047 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world, there has always been a gap between rich and poor; however, in her book Plutocrats, Chrystia Freeland demonstrates that within the past few decades, the gap has grown significantly wider. The rich are becoming wealthier at such rapid speed that the middle class is being squeezed out. While the top ten percent of Americans on the income distribution receive more than half of the nation's income, Freeland demonstrates that it is actually the wealthiest 0.1 percent of citizens who are outpacing the rest of society the fastest, consequently refining what it means to be rich in the 21st century. These self-made oligarchs belong to a transglobal community and admit to having more in common with one another than they do with the rest of society. So what is driving this profound shift in income inequality, and how can we fix it?…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This chart is calculated by an Economist From New York university, Edward Wolff. It showed the top ten percent of people own seventy-seven percent of the United States and the bottom forty percent own nothing. In fact, “Wolff calculates that this bottom 40 percent actually has an overall negative net worth, which means that they owe more money than they own -- and they probably owe that money to somebody in that top five or 10 percent” (Ingraham). Christopher also referred to a report wrote by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that shows America has the largest Wealth gap among other developing nations. He showed that we are owning nothing. How can we own nothing? This resource can provide me a huge amount of statistic data from a famous institute or a government organization that can increase the power of convincing my readers to believe the Inequality is…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inheritances violate capitalistic ideals of distribution according to productivity by allowing rich children to enjoy their parents’ wealth avoiding economic productivity. These children then inherit millions, continuing their wealth. Inversely, lower class citizens who work hard and have high economic…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Happiest Country

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rich people the world over become richer because their focus is on acquiring more wealth.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In India GNP (Gross National Product) per capita was $1,180 in 2009 at current prices, roughly one third of the population is below the poverty line. On world scale, income inequalities between the developed and underdeveloped countries arc very large.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rich countries consume much more resources then their fair share. Therefore, poor countries are unable to provide their citizens with these decent living conditions because there aren’t any affordable resources.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EDA 3046 unisa

    • 2056 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The relationship between richer and poorer , there must be a fairer distribution of the world’s wealth and resources.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays