Why Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) should be labeled
A growing number of farmers adapting genetically modified organisms (GMO) since when it was introduced to US market. GMO’ features have been providing various benefits for both farmers and consumers. Especially herbicide-tolerant (HT) and insect-resistant, the Bacillus Thuringiensis (BT) toxin, became major GMO features because of their attractive functions. HT and BT featured crops are common in our daily life such as corns, cottons, and soybeans. Moreover, some crops are genetically modified to be nutritious rich. On the other hand, there are arguments between those who claims GMO are totally safe and who claims there are potential risks to health and environment. Latter also claim products containing GMO should be properly labeled in order for consumers to avoid such risks.
According to National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), GMO account for 81-86 percent of all corn planted acres, 87-90 percent of all soybean planted acres, and 81-93 percent of all upland cotton planted acres in States ("Adoption of genetically," 2010). In this market, Monsanto is a leading company producing GMO seeds. In the article, “What’s the Problem with Labeling Genetically-Modified (GM/GMO) Foods?” they argue against GMO cons. Keep emphasizing that GMO are as safe as non-GMO and they state, “Requiring labeling for ingredients that don’t pose a health issue would undermine both our labeling laws and consumer confidence” ("What's the problem,”). Which appears to be reasonable, as long as their basis of claim “GMO are as safe as non-GMO” is true. While they do not provide any background evidences for this claim, there are some researchers claiming GMO have potential risk.
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), non-profit science advocacy and major GMO cons, argues against those who support GMO. On their website, UCS states problems about surrounding environment of GMO, such as legislative problems, human health...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document