Preview

Genetic Cloning and Its Religious Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genetic Cloning and Its Religious Ethics
The paper I chose to write a rebuttal on focuses on genetic cloning and its religious ethics. The basis of this article is that cloning a human being is wrong and scientists should know better to do so. The author argues, just because we can do something does not mean we should. Many people reference the bible as stating God created everything and if we clone living biological entities, then we are assuming the role of God and creating life. In this article, the author makes the point that God is the father of all life and life starts in the womb. That is the only way life should begin. Although this article starts out fairly, non-objective, that changes quite dramatically by the end of the article. I will be going over some of the key points of this article and identifying why I think this article is biased and based on feeling and not on fact. This article tends to focus more on the potential negative aspects of cloning and not the positive ones. This article does a good job of explaining what cloning is and what the basic principles are. This article begins by talking about cloning and talking about the famed sheep clone Dolly. The article quickly takes a turn in the negative by comparing the process to "Dr. Frankenstein". The author makes the point that in the case of Dolly, although Dolly was a genetic clone, the process of creating the clone involved using DNA and transplanting it into the sheep so that it gives birth to a genetic copy. The author claims that this is ok because the birthing still took place inside the womb of a living creature. However later in the article, the author makes the point that in the bible it states that a child should be the product of a husband and wife. Does this very statement not contradict the other? By this logic not only is genetic cloning wrong, but artificial insemination would also go against the bible, that however is a completely different topic in itself. Although this method of cloning is acceptable, other


References: Web Sites http://justchristians.com/bibleStudy/articles/cloning.html What Does the Bible Say About Cloning? by Mark Roberts http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/050607_gecko_females.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Imagine a world where there are clones who look exactly like a specific person. A world with many famous figures of the past, such as George Washington, Mother Teresa, and so many more. With cloning, that world may be possible, concluded “Cloning and the Human Family: Theology After Dolly” by Allen Verhey. A clone is a genetic copy of an individual. Scientifically, animals and other species can be cloned by “transferring DNA from a single cell of an animal into an egg cell and creating a relatively exact copy of that animal,” according to “Genetic Defects Found in Cloned Animals” by Steve Mitchell (Mitchell).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pulitzer Prize winner and renown columnist, Charles Krauthammer, analyzes the controversial topic of cloning; providing readers with an ethical perspective via explicit research and inquiry in his academic article, “Crossing Lines.” Taking an intellectual and pensive approach as he examines noteworthy ethical concerns beginning with the least complex—like the principle belief that life begins at conception; thus, the manipulation of an embryo is intentional disfiguration and maltreatment of an underdeveloped child—to the far more convoluted—such as applying the commandant, “thou shalt not kill” to the possibly of embryo mass production in the near future; where embryos will be readily disposed of once they’ve served their purpose. Krauthammer…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leon Kass’s provides a compelling article on why the world should ban cloning. Kass’ article, “Preventing a Brave New World”, provides Kass’ theories of if society progresses on its current path, society would start to turn to cloning as an alternative to typical reproduction. Cloning offers a way to design an offspring rather than the typical experience of child raising. Kass believes if cloning is not banned, society will be more dependent upon technology and be at technologies whim.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Annas, G.J, "Regulatory models for human embryo cloning: The free market, professional guidelines, and government restrictions,"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal (4)3:235-249, 1994. Brock, D., “Cloning Human Beings: An Assessment of the Ethical Issues Pro and Con,” paper prepared for NBAC, 1997. Brock, D.W. "The non-identity problem and genetic harm,"Bioethics 9:269-275, 1995. Cahill, L., Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 13, 1997. Chadwick, R.F., "Cloning," Philosophy 57: 201-209, 1982. Coleman, “Playing God or playing scientist: A constitutional analysis of laws banning embryological procedures,” 27 Pacific Law Journal 1331, 1996. Duff, N., “Theological Reflections on Human Cloning,” Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 13, 1997. Etzioni, A., The Moral Dimension (NY: The Free Press, 1990). Feinberg, J., "The child 's right to an open future," inWhose Child? Children 's Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power, W.Aiken and H. LaFollette (eds.) (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980). Glendon, M.A., Rights Talk (New York: The Free Press, 1991). Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, , 1996). Jonas, H., Philosophical Essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974). Kass, L., “Why We Should Ban the Cloning of Human Beings,” Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 13, 1997. Kevles, D.J., In the Name of Eugenics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995). Meilaender, G., “Remarks on Human Cloning to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 13, 1997. -83-…

    • 11085 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source: According to the article entitled “what is the Christian view of human cloning?” It states that God created human unique and likeness and human’s life is so precious that can’t be treated as commodity.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Cloning a Human Being

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The style Lewis Thomas uses is very unique. He writes in a very conversational tone, making it easier for readers to read and relate. He also adds in rhetorical questions as well as short simple sentences in his writing structure, and the entire passage seems to flow eloquently. Lewis Thomas has a distinct voice that is unique only to himself.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Dolly the sheep was successfully cloned in 1997, and the possibility of cloning humans became a reality, Christian leaders have been ever thinking about whether or not cloning is morally right or wrong. While many Christians tend to disagree with the practice, such as Roman Catholics and a majority of fundamentalist pastors, the views taken by various other Christian denominations are very different and often, It is hard to pinpoint any one, definite stance of the Christian religion, since there are so many Christian view points and no final decision concerning the morality of human cloning.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Synthesis Essay on Cloning

    • 3550 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Introduction: Cloning hit the mainstream as a scientific debate when scientists cloned a lamb named Dolly in 1996. Cloning is a process that results in an identical genetic copy of a biological product such as cells, tissues, genes or entire entities. After scientists took cloning beyond the genetic engineering of simple DNA to actual mammals, the controversy grew to new heights. Cloning happens naturally. Plants and bacteria often use asexual reproduction, which tends to produce an exact genetic copy. Twins are another example of natural cloning. Scientists use artificial cloning for use with genes, reproduction and therapy. "Gene cloning produces copies of genes or segments of DNA," according to the National Human Genome Research Institute. "Reproductive cloning produces copies of whole animals. Therapeutic cloning produces embryonic stem cells for experiments aimed at creating tissues to replace injured or diseased tissues." Many argue that cloning can be beneficial in fields such as medicine, agriculture, and science. Others claims that cloning has a direct impact that challenges or runs counter to the moral or religious values of millions of people.…

    • 3550 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The process of cloning has remained one of the most controversial topics as debates continue about the pros and cons of Cloning. Cloning which is the process of duplicating DNA or living stem cells can be dated back to over 200 years ago. The two most common types of cloning are Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Cloning. Therapeutic cloning is a process that specifies the use of cloning stem cells for the treatment of an illness or disability (Ham, 2007). Reproductive Cloning involves inserting a cell into a host but uses donated embryos to harvest stem cells that can be converted into almost any type of cell needed (Ham, 2007). Many arguments are being posed by scientists, pro-life representatives, medical researchers and religious followers about why the practice of cloning should be allowed or banned with all parties making strong points on either side. Today there is a great amount of experimenting and cloning tests being conducted on animals. The United States government has suppressed support for human cloning practices (Bush, 2002). This report will elaborate on the different views from the pro and con side of cloning and provide a realistic synthesis and a conclusive resolution for the practices surrounding the cloning process.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The technology everyday is more advanced, and this is an example of all the the things that humans can create or destroy with this advanced medical technology. To some persons this is the chance for having a better and healthier life, but for others they say that they are playing with God, and this generates controversies between scientist and religion. Since the year 1990, the new futuristic technology like human cloning have created public fears about designing the DNA of babies, and also the creation of altered food. Its logical that something so powerful will generate controversies between the society, that's why their is a United States Supreme case dealing with whether genetically modified organism can be patented. There is also the Bowman…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Cloning Controversy

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the dawn of civilization, mankind has been plagued by innumerable ethical quandaries. From the subjugation of those whose pigment doesn’t match our own to the creation of weapons of mass destruction, history has repeatedly shown us that as the human race progresses, there are always ethical dilemmas that make us question our every step. As our technological capabilities continue to grow at an exponential rate, these predicaments have continued to crop up alarmingly fast. Among the most recent ethical questions to plague our society is the one pertaining to human cloning. Supporters of this potential technological breakthrough cite it as one of the greatest achievement of the human race, while its detractors bemoan the ethics of…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics