Preview

General Sherman's role in the Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Sherman's role in the Civil War
Evaluate the role of General Sherman in the defeat of the Confederacy.

William Tecumseh Sherman was an American soldier, businessman, educator and author. He served as a General in the Union Army during the American Civil War. He was a renowned general and received commendation for his outstanding command of military strategy, as well as being criticised for his harshness of the “scorched earth” policies that he implemented in conducting total war against the South. Sherman’s attitude to war and his implementation of the strategy of total war were vital in the defeat of the Confederacy.

Sherman’s attitude to the Confederate forces was a key aspect in the result of a Union Victory. Sherman admired the Southern forces and wrote in a letter to his wife in 1864, describing the Confederate forces. “The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired. No amount of poverty or adversity seems to shake their faith.” Sherman’s view on the Southern spirit would play a significant role in the way Sherman attempted to overcome these forces. Sherman’s subsequent actions after his letter to his wife accentuated his belief that severe measures were necessary to break the dogged Confederate resistance.

The March to the Sea was the most destructive campaign against a civilian population during the Civil War and began in Atlanta on November 15, 1864. The movement was conducted by General Sherman and began the process of waging total annihilation on the South, which Sherman defined as “hard war”. The campaign began at the captured city of Atlanta on November 15 and ended with the capture of Port Savannah on December 21. Sherman’s forces destroyed infrastructure, industry and civilian property and disrupted the South’s economy. This disparaging nature of warfare was not unknown to Sherman as he viewed war as being cruel. In his comments at the Louisiana State Seminary on 24 December 1860 he stated, “War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1861-1864 georgia studies

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sherman’s army moved quickly through the state heading from Atlanta to Savannah, burning everything in the path sixty miles wide on the three hundred miles trek to the coast. On his way to Atlanta to Savannah, Sherman destroys all military targets and the civilian economic system…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman’s March was a march lead by General William T. Sherman. During this march he lead 100,000 soldiers from Tennessee to Atlanta , Georgia. The purpose of Sherman’s March was to destroy Confederate industries and railroads. This march affected the Civil War because Confederate troops now had no railroads for fast transport of troops. Also, the Confederates now had no way to make goods because the Union had destroyed their industries and factories. If this didn’t happen, the Confederates could have sent their troops through their railroads to attack the Union. This could have majorly changed the outcome of the war. The Union could have been attacked and the Confederates could have gained more land. Lincoln needed a victory from the union…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethnics of Sherman's March

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    General Sherman had several objectives in mind when setting out from Atlanta aside from reaching and taking Savannah. Important objectives included destroying any buildings that could assist the Confederacy. Other valuable…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Civil War, there were many great commanders that helped make the war successful. Winfield Scott Hancock is not only known for the Civil War, but in the many other wars that he fought bravely in. Hancock is known for when he commanded the Union center, and defeated Confederate troops, which was known as Pickett's Charge.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This first entry into the book showcases the side of the southern Confederate armies, who were comparing the Civil War to the Revolutionary War. They saw their enemies, the Northern Yankees, as nothing more than tyrants trying to oppress the south. Just as the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago. This gave them a "holy cause of southern freedom", a reason to step into the shoes of their famed forefathers and once again fight for their liberties and constitutional rights.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Id's

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William T. Sherman- Put in charge of dividing the South by land, led the “March to the Sea” and scorched Georgia; also captured Atlanta in 1864.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Memoirs of General William T. Sherman, it reveals Sherman letters to the Union generals. Sherman letter to General Ulysses S. Grant, commander in chief of all Union forces in the Civil War, he discusses his belief about the size of armies and how that plays into of the nature modern warfare. “We ought to ask our country for the largest possible armies that can be raised...” (McFeely 114). Sherman feels it is important thing as the self- existence of a great nation should not chance war (114). He believes the bigger the army the better. The letter to General John Bell Hood, commander of Confederate Army of Tennessee, discusses their wrangle over the city of Atlanta. Sherman has deemed that citizens now residing in Atlanta should remove. Since Sherman believes that Atlanta is no place for families and his real reasons are they want all houses of Atlanta for military storage and occupation and to contract the lines of defense. Because of these reasons he is providing food and transportation for further north and transportation by cars for Rough and Ready. Sherman letter to General Hood is hoping this proposition of his meets Hood views. Hood response to Sherman letter was he does not consider that he has any alternative in this matter. He describes Sherman removing proposal as “the “unprecedented” measures transcends, in studied and ingenious cruelty, all acts ever before brought to my attention in the dark history of war” (119). Sherman justifies his “unprecedented” measures by referring to General Johnston whom very wise and properly removed the families all the way from Dalton down. Sherman also feels it was unnecessary to appeal to the dark history, when recant and modern examples are so handy. Sherman feels he has not once judged General Hood for his cruelty, so why is his proposal a major concern. “I ask you not to appeal to a just God in such a sacrilegious manner: You who, in the midst of peace and prosperity, have plunged a…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our great army of the Confederacy will keep on fighting for the independence of our nation and stop Grant's army. Our leaders believe he is the Union's greatest commander. We are still holding out hope of defeating Grant. Our army held out for nine months before that against Grant’s army, but our army could not hold out against the continual attacks from Grant.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It was now 1859 and tensions between the North and the South had become more and more apparent. Living in the South, Sherman had begun to notice fears in a lot of the southerners about slave revolts, fanatical abolitionists (like John Brown), and fears of secession. However with all these fears, Sherman’s first year at the Academy went surprisingly well. In a letter he wrote to his wife at this time he predicted what a Civil War would mean to his country saying “ If attempted we will have a Civil War of the most horrible Kind.”(Flood) However this was not Sherman’s only prophecy of a Civil War. In Lloyd Lewis’ book, Sherman: Fighting Prophet he uses a letter Sherman wrote to a fellow professor the Louisiana State Seminary, David F. Boyd. The letter…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1850's a division in the country between North and South widened. However, in spite of the rising rhetoric, the state of Georgia was far from becoming a "war machine." In Marietta, the Georgia Military Institute went to the state for funds only three times between 1852 and 1863. Throughout the state, railroads were being built up for economic reasons, not reasons of war. Atlanta was concerned about fighting equipment for its newly formed fire department, not for some secret military unit. Life went on "as usual" until the 1860 Presidential campaign.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil war was not a fun battle. Many people died during that war. During the 1800’s the southern portion of the United States broke off and became its own separate country. They became the Confederate states of America or the Confederacy. The U.S. and the C.S. were very different countries. The C.S. heavily practiced slavery while slavery was banned in the U.S. The U.S. was more industry based while the C.S. was based on agriculture. The U.S. wanted the C.S. to rejoin with it. This lead to a civil war. The north ended up winning the civil war which contributes to Grant being a better general than Lee.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with your statements of the March to the Sea. However, Sherman knew that the Confederacy got their strength from the moral support of the southerners. So, in that ensure destroying them will destroy the Confederacy. Also, the soldiers could burn Barnes and wrecked bridges before the army could reach them. Furthermore, Sherman’s and his troops made it hard for the Conference to fight back. Additionally, agree with you without what Sherman did slavery would’ve probably carry on a little longer, good post.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays