The 1950s through the 1960s were all about civil rights. African Americans fought to assert there full rights as Americans, Woman fought to be able to stand next to a man in whatever profession and also vote. And now since the late 1960s it’s the gays turn to fight for equal rights. The movement for gay equality in the constitution has been a recent topic for debate in the united states.
Over the last several decades, gay rights advocates have made significant strides in better protecting homosexuals from discrimination, violence, and exclusion. However, many people assert that gays continue to experience discrimination on a scale unequaled by almost any other minority population. Despite the hard-won gains that now allow many in the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community (often abbreviated as GLBT or LGBT) —including those serving as elected officials, in high-profile business roles, and in the military—to be open about their sexuality, they are still denied what gay rights advocates contend is one of the most basic rights that heterosexual Americans take for granted: the right to marry and have that marriage recognized by the U.S. and state governments. Indeed, in recent years, dozens of states and jurisdictions have passed legislation explicitly outlawing same-sex marriage, while several others—including Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, and Washington, D.C.—have legalized the practice. Homosexuals have been trying to secure them selves from vilonce and exclusion the best they could. And now its time to take it out of there hands
Americans' views on gay marriage have shifted markedly over the past several decades. A Gallup poll from 1996, for example, showed only 27 percent of Americans supported gay marriage, with 68 percent opposed. In 2012, however, a Wall Street Journal and NBC News poll found that 49 percent of Americans supported legalization and 40 percent opposed it. Additionally, polls have shown that younger Americans tend to be more supportive of gay marriage. Gay rights advocates have argued that it is unconstitutional to deny homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals. Opponents, on the other hand, have backed amendments to the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions to define marriage as being exclusively between a man and a woman. On May 9, 2012, during a television interview with ABC, President Barack Obama (D) stated that he believed that homosexuals should have the right to marry. The statement marked the first time that a sitting president had voiced support for same-sex marriage. And in November 2012, voters in three states—Maine, Maryland, and Washington—approved initiatives supporting same-sex marriage, while voters in Minnesota rejected a proposal to ban the practice. The results marked a stark contrast from previous national elections, in which anti-gay marriage propositions served as a rallying call for social conservatives and increased Republican turnout. Should gay marriages be recognized by the federal government, or should they be banned by a constitutional amendment? Do gay people need better legal protection against discrimination, just as earlier civil rights movements did? Supporters of gay rights argue that homosexuals should be able to enjoy the same rights as everyone else in society. The fact that some people happen to be attracted to their own gender, they argue, is incidental and should not have any bearing on their ability to exercise their basic rights. The gay rights movement is analogous to the movements to gain equality for racial minorities and women, supporters contend, and gay rights initiatives deserve the same consideration as those earlier movements. As was the case with earlier rights movements, they stress, gay people are not asking for special treatment—they are only asking to be treated equally. Opponents, meanwhile, are quick to point out that they are simply trying to uphold social conventions that...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document