Diversity Issues:
Gay Marriage In America
Jared
English
Professor
April 29th 2011
Diversity Issues 2
Diversity Issues:
Gay Marriage In America
The director and founder of the Marriage-Equality organization Freedom to Marry, Evan Wolfson, says that when the term “gay marriage” is used it suggests that homosexuals are asking for special privileges or are expecting to get them. However, I could not disagree with that statement more. Marriage is marriage, when you call it a “gay marriage” it takes the meaning of it down a notch. I like the way Joel Defner explains it, “A menu is a menu, but a kids menu is a very particular kind of menu, sharing some but not all of the qualities of other menus.” Marriage is marriage, and offers a host of possibilities. "Gay marriage," I think, offers fewer.
Many people have strong opinions regarding “gay marriage”, but they have drawn quite different conclusions in addressing the following questions:
1. Would same-sex “marriage” undercut the sexual fidelity norm within a marriage?
2. Would same-sex “marriage” further isolate marriage from its purpose of being procreative?
This remainder of my essay focuses on these two questions.
Would same-sex “marriage” undercut the sexual fidelity norm within a marriage?
Diversity Issues 3
I feel that there is a big threat same-sex “marriage” poses to marriage. Same-sex “marriage” has the potential to undercut the norm of sexual fidelity within marriage. In Vermont there has been a recent study of civil unions and marriages that suggests that this should be a real concern. The study showed that more than 80 percent of heterosexual married men and women said that they strongly valued sexual fidelity. Only about 50 percent of gay couples in civil unions valued sexual fidelity. (Rothblum, 2003) The surveys clearly show that there is a considerable difference between the view points of heterosexuals and homosexuals when it comes to the value of sexual fidelity.
Would same-sex “marriage” further isolate marriage from its purpose of being procreative? Marriage and procreation are typically or traditionally very closely knit to one another. E. Mavis Hetherington, author of For Better or for Worse, states that “from a sociological perspective, the primary purpose that marriage serves is to secure a mother and father for each child who is born into a society. Now, however, many Westerners see marriage in primarily emotional terms.” The problem with this is that it fuels the idea of a total population decline. Same-sex marriage “would further undercut the procreative norm long associated with marriage insofar as it establishes
Diversity Issues 4 that there is no necessary link between procreation and marriage.”(Steven Rhoads, 2004) In conclusion let homosexuals get their special unions, and civil rights that goes with them. However, we should not give those unions the title and status of marriage. Marriage is in plenty of trouble as it is and is indicated in many ways. In
order to please the minority we should not give gay couples the title of marriage. Americans constantly keep voting across the states, to keep the two forms of relationships separate and they vote against it with good reason.
“No life-way that splits men from women, and celebrates their separation, should be granted equal dignity with heterosexual marriage, which brings and binds them together.” (Steven Rhoads 2004)
Diversity Issues 5
References
Steven Rhoads, Taking Sex Differences Seriously (Encounter Books, 2004).
Esther Rothblum and Sondra Solomon, Civil Unions in the State of Vermont: A Report on the First Year. University of Vermont Department of Psychology, 2003.
David McWhirter and Andrew Mattison, The Male Couple (Prentice Hall, 1984) 252.
E. Mavis Hetherington and John Kelly, For Better or For Worse. (W.W. Norton and Co., 2002) 31
|Area of Evaluation |Excellent |Good |Fair, But Needs |Seriously Requires |
| | | |Improvement |Attention |
|Time Management |Assignment is completed |NA |NA |Assignment is turned in|
| |on time. (10 points) | | |late. (0 points) |
|Format |The paper follows the |The paper follows most of|There is some question |The paper does not come|
| |guidelines of the |the guidelines of the |as to whether you |close to what was |
| |assignment. (20-25 |assignment. (14-19 |completely understood |required for the |
| |points) |points). |the assignment. (9-13 |assignment. (0-8 |
| | | |points) |points) |
|Editing |There are few, if any, |There are several errors,|There are serious issues|Problems with grammar |
| |punctuation, |but they are of one or |with mechanics: sentence|and mechanics are so |
| |capitalization, or errors|two types: commas, |structure, syntax |severe the paper is |
| |with sentence or |capitalization, |problems, serious |difficult to read. |
| |paragraph structure. |paragraph, prepositions, |paragraph issues, etc. |(0-5 points) |
| |(18-20 points) |or verbs. (12-17 points) |(6-11 points) | |
|Coherence |The main idea is clear |The main idea is clear |There does not seem to |The main idea is not |
| |and there is significant |and has support, but the |be a main idea, or there|clear, and the |
| |support for it. (30-35 |support is general and/or|is not adequate support |supporting points are |
| |points) |weak. (20-29 points) |for it. (10-19 points) |difficult to |
| | | | |understand. (0-9 |
| | | | |points) |
|Cohesion |The information is |The main idea is clear, |It is difficult to |The paper is confusing |
| |presented in a clear |and the support is there,|identify your thesis |and difficult to |
| |manner. It is easy to |but it is difficult to |because you seem to jump|understand. It seems |
| |identify your thesis and |identify a logical |from one idea to |more like a loose |
| |one point logically leads|pattern. (5-7 points) |another. (2-4 points) |collection of random |
| |to the next. (8-10 | | |thoughts. |
| |points) | | |(0-1 points) |
References: Steven Rhoads, Taking Sex Differences Seriously (Encounter Books, 2004). Esther Rothblum and Sondra Solomon, Civil Unions in the State of Vermont: A Report on the First Year. University of Vermont Department of Psychology, 2003. David McWhirter and Andrew Mattison, The Male Couple (Prentice Hall, 1984) 252. E. Mavis Hetherington and John Kelly, For Better or For Worse. (W.W. Norton and Co., 2002) 31 |Area of Evaluation |Excellent |Good |Fair, But Needs |Seriously Requires |
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marriage is and has always been defined as the union between a man and a woman. In 1971, the Supreme Court of Minnesota decision of Baker v. Nelson found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family is as old as the book of Genesis.” Gay marriage can lead down a “slippery slope” resulting in giving people in polygamous, incestuous, bestial, and other nontraditional relationships. By legalizing same-sex marriage, America is de-instutionalizing marriage.…
- 471 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.…
- 1427 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Marriage is a fundamental right and should be available to any couple, regardless of sexual orientation. Our current legislative system protects the term “marriage” under a religious definition, stating that the bible calls for only a man and woman to be joined in matrimony. Because the United States does not dictate a sole religion, it is unfair to limit legal marriage to only heterosexual couples based upon Christian beliefs that are not practiced by every American. If marriage could be recognized as an emotional commitment by two people to each other for life, then there is no public way, if one…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the article “Some of my Questions about Gay Marriage” by Amy Becker she quotes Andrew Sullivan, a Catholic man who also happens to be gay, he separates out the definition of marriage for religion and the law. From a religious point of view, marriage is a union between a man and a woman in which they are one before god. In a lawful marriage they are legally bound together and receive certain benefits from being ‘bound’ by the law. The main differences between being married in the eyes of religion and law are that religion specifically defines the union between and man and a woman for the purposes of procreation, law does not care about that portion of the union. Being catholic myself I can see where the definition and purpose of marriage to Catholics does not fall into line with the definition and purpose of gay marriage; however from the perspective of the law and the benefits that married couples receive I can see how gay couples would feel they are being discriminated against by denying them those benefits.…
- 356 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The concept of same-sex marriage is currently a controversial idea across the nation. I believe it is possible to arrive at an amicable solution, but there is an important discussion regarding the route that must be taken in order to arrive at this solution. Both sides continue to argue over their respective philosophical differences and I am not attempting to determine which side provides the best answer, but instead, point out the issues that exist within the structure of the debate. My goal is to play the role of the telephone repair man, simply providing for a more clear dialogue between callers, without having to decide which speaker is right.…
- 1804 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriage, in other words, same-sex marriage is defined as “the legally recognized union between partners of the same sex” (Oxford Dictionary Online). During the early period, people have been prejudiced against gay and lesbian marriage. It’s understandable since any big change in public policy must be justified and its risks carefully evaluated from their point of view. A number of questions have been made: “Do gays and lesbians make good parents as good as straight parents?”, “Will their childen’s sex be affected by them?” “Will it break down family values?” This issue has been stirring discussion for years. However, people have been supportive and gay marriage has gained more and more acceptances lately. According to BBC News, Netherlands was the first country to legalize same-sex marriage in April 1st, 2001 following by Belgium, Oriato (Canada) and British Columbia allowed equal marriage for gay and lesbian couples in the next two years (2003). Currently, there are 19 countries and 17 states where gay marriage is legal and people are more likely to support same-sex marriage. Apparently, this term has become more popular in Vietnam as the “I do” campaign attracted more than 70000 likes on facebook and thousands of photos and videos with content I do (Lan 2013), which strongly encourages gay marriage to become legal. This paper discusses the question whether gay marriage should be legalized or not.…
- 1063 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the United States, marriage has always played a crucial role in the lives of its citizens. Known to some as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, or even a matter arranged by parents, marriage is widely practiced and celebrated all over the world. Marriage can be said to be the ultimate act of love, supported with benefits and privileges from the government. The right to marry and love whoever you want has been an corner stone in culture for centuries. It has naturally left such an impact on the development of our country that it has been integrated into the parameters of the law. However, out-dated traditions dictate that marriage must be between a man and a woman, a notion that has sparked much debate in a society where the battle for equal opportunity and freedom of expression run rampant. The institution of marriage is only as strong as those who are in it, and it is weakened, by definition, when it arbitrarily excludes any class of couples. Moreover, to outlaw same-sex marriage is to deny equal-individual’s rights and freedoms under the first amendment, and a clear discrimination against one of our founding principles that is held dear by many.…
- 1844 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is difficult to explain why it is that people of the same sex should be able to marry. It is more difficult to explain this to the die hard believers of the idea that the sanctity of marriage should be between a man and a woman. Our country was founded around the basic freedoms that should be extended to all people no matter race, nationality, gender or sexual orientation. If we argue the matter of law, “The Supreme Court has declared that marriage is a basic civil right, older than the Constitution itself. When civil rights are at stake there is no such thing as deserving them; they are intrinsic to our very way of life” (Gannon. par 1). Since marriage is a civil right then it should be extended to all, no matter the circumstance, anything other than that is discrimination. There are many reasons that we, as Americans, can argue that marriage should only be between a man and woman; however, in doing research on this subject one would find that there are also many reasons that people should be able to marry who they love. The Bible states that homosexuality is an abomination, a sin in the eyes of God, but there are many other sins far worse. History shows that marriage is for procreation and since same sex couples cannot repopulate then there is no point in the union. “Marriage, however, is no longer (if it ever was) primarily for the conception and raising of children. It is all about the closeness and companionship of two people” (Gannon. par 6). I choose now to look for the reasons that people say same-sex marriage should not be allowed and show you why these are weak arguments when held against all that we as Americans hold dear.…
- 1467 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Approximately 11 million Americans identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, yet despite this figure being such a substantial portion of the United States population, these Americans still have to battle for equal rights. Same-sex marriage is arguably the most exposed and tensest issue that surrounds the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) Community. Currently, same-sex marriage is one of the most controversial political issues in the United States, making headlines on a near daily basis. This essay is to explore the growth of the acceptance of same-sex marriage in the United States, as well as the progression towards equality over time. In the past ten years, same-sex marriage has become legal in eleven states and Washington D.C., and the number keeps growing at a rapid rate. The fight for marriage equality, however, has spanned over decades. According to my research, more states are expected to change their laws as support for same-sex marriage grows around the country, as this is something that is effecting the whole country. The support for equality continues to grow, showing signs that the anti-gay bias in America is finally starting to subside.…
- 2299 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Although the gay marriage topic has been pretty hot this year and during the Presidential debate, it has been around for a while, but people tended to ignore it. In contrast, today the topic has gained national attention. Not only has it been an interesting topic to look at in terms of same-sex weeding but also due to religious means. Some opponents object to same-sex marriage on religious grounds, arguing that extending marriage to homosexual couple's undercuts the conventional meaning of marriage in various traditions, and does not fulfill and procreation role. Writers have coined the term "marriage" to be restricted to a religious context and that state and federal government should not be involved in the religious practice. This could be viewed as a governmental intrusion into religion; that the word "marriage" should be replaced with "domestic partnership" and thus bypasses the controversy over the issue of gender. From this would evolve a contract between any two individuals who have attained their majority.…
- 670 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the American Gay Rights Movement: A Timeline, gays have been fighting for rights since the 1920’s, and today those pleas for rights and equal opportunities still go unheard. I do not believe it is fair to discriminate against gays for being together. America is a free country and people should be able to be in a relationship with whomever they desire. Banning marriage amongst a certain group of people is unfair and it is discrimination. I believe that we should allow same-sex marriage because banning it is unfair, love is all that matters in marriage, and gay families have certain family values that some straight marriages lack.…
- 875 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Gay marriage has been the subject of debate for centuries in different areas all over the world. Today, in America, the decision to legalize gay marriage is being debated in each state. To date, there are twelve states that have approved gay marriages; among them are New York, Connecticut, California and more. Many people are against gay marriage because the Bible and other religious books states that marriage is between a man and a woman in order to have children but I believe gay marriage should be legal everywhere. Lesbian, gay, heterosexual or transgender are all humans, and we all deserve equal rights; gay marriage does not harm anyone, individuals or society in general, so why shouldn’t gay people receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples receive?…
- 624 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine being in love with someone and not being about to show your true affection by marrying them. Gays and lesbians have to deal with that everyday. As an article states "In the 2000 census it was found that there were 601,209 committed gay couples in America." So why not just let these couples get married? Not letting them is going against human rights. Many people say that gay couples should not have kids .. why not? Marriage is suppose to be about love, it should not matter what gender you are.…
- 486 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Gay Marriage Rights (Persuasive Essay) After the legalizations in Massachusetts and, most recently, California, gay marriage has been a growing trend in the United States. In the 8 months since the legalization, more and more gay couples have been rushing to California to tie the knot. However, California and Massachusetts are not the fi... Premium 849 Words 4 Pages…
- 1086 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays