What is the big deal over the same sex marriages? This has always been a controversial issue. There are two issues that come to mind. First, there is the religious point of view. Many religious leaders oppose homosexuality or specifically same sex marriages, they feel that God made men and women to produce and take care of children and that is how it should be. They also feel that God created Adam and Eve because that’s how God wants us to finish the cycle. Second, there is the issue of being the caretaker of children. A family unit to those who oppose gay marriages is defined as a man, woman and children. Gay couples cannot, in their opinion, raise children morally in an immoral background or home. Then there are people such as Gay rights groups, who argue that states cannot justify excluding gay and lesbian couples from the institution of marriage and the protection it provides. They argue that only marriage provides a legal safety net protecting couples emotional bonds and economic security. They also argue that children do well in homes where they are nurtured and loved, regardless of the parents' genders. Homosexuals are defined as people who are sexually attracted to people of the same sex. The words "gays" are also common terms used instead of "homosexuals", whereas "lesbians" are only used to describe female homosexuals. These fundamental definitions of homosexuals already indicate that this minority group is evenly distributed throughout the entire society. Homosexuals can exist in all classes, social groups, races, positions, and countries, regardless of their age or origin. Julius Caesar, Plato, and Alexander the Great are known homosexuals. The initial challenge is an ethical one. Gay couples want the same rights as heterosexual couples, and by classic reciprocity principles, this is something all citizens can understand. We would want the same thing, and thus the gay couples have the Golden Rule on their side. Two other modes of ethical analysis are not, at least not unequivocally. The moral systems of many Americans declare homosexual relations to be an absolute wrong, and thus conduct that should not and cannot be approved by legislation. So there is an absolutist analysis that opposes gay marriage, and a utilitarian analysis that says it is wrong as well. That analysis concludes that the institution of marriage, the stability of the family, and the welfare of society generally will suffer if marriage is expanded to include same sex couples; in classic utilitarian terms, the unequal treatment of gays is necessary to ensure a larger societal good. When it comes to religion on gay marriages most religions consider being gay a sin. According to Messerli (2009), the legal system in the U.S. evolved out of the laws contained in the Bible and that we should not go further to tear down those laws. There is a lot of religion that accepts gays because they do not want to come between the freedoms of religion. The Catholic bishop Author Serratelli accepts gays into his church because he feels that his church has a lot to offer (Christian Century, 2006). There are some Catholics that do not accept gays into their church because they feel that marriage is only a lifetime union between a man and a woman. Buddhism does not accept gays because of they do not accept sexual misconduct and in their opinion, gay relations is sexual misconduct. The Episcopal Church accepts gays into their church as well. However, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is on the same side as Catholics, marriage is only sacred between man and a woman. Islam do not allow gay couples, they consider that a sin. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not recognize same sex marriages either (The Pew Forum, 2010).
Another major reason why many people do not accept gay relations or marriages is the AIDS disease. Many feel the disease originated and continue to flourish from gay people. While this is not accurate because anyone can get...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document