Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gay Marriage

Better Essays
1392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage
Gay Marriage: It’s all in the Wording In the United States, gay marriage has been a subject that most politicians in the limelight try to avoid due to its controversial stigma. Many Americans would argue that every individual has the freedom and right to marry; that same-sex marriages would be beneficial to the economic growth and development of our nation. Going beyond the religious argument, same-sex marriage is not a civil right, nor should the privileges be denied to a specific group of individuals. In Evan Wolfson’s essay, “What is Marriage?” he takes a civil right standpoint on the same-sex marriage debate and states that the union between two partners is a essential part of life and shouldn’t be denied to any individual whether he/she be homosexual or heterosexual. Stripping rights away from an individual based on their sexual orientation doesn’t seem American. The United States takes pride in its freedom it offers its citizens and is a melting pot of hundreds of different cultures, beliefs, and ethnicities. All of which has the same rights and privileges as anyone else. In heated debates, the religious perspective on the subject has clouded the argument whether homosexuals should obtain the right to marry or not. Most religions see marriage as a foundation to their beliefs and take offence at the thought of degrading its sanctity by allowing same-sex couple’s access to it. “Second, the justices said, marriage has for many people an important spiritual or religious dimension” (Wolfson 103). In the United States, Christianity seems to be the overwhelming religion that’s against same-sex marriages. “Proponents of gay marriage think their view is the latest expression of enlightened humanitarianism. That means people who believe in the sanctity of traditional marriage may soon wind up on the wrong side of "enlightened” bigotry” (Forman). Persevering the meaning and definition is the primary reason anti-gay marriage advocates argue on the subject. As long as the religious standpoint on gay marriage is brought up, no progress could ever be sought out on the matter. Religion should not be trumped on by a group of individuals just so that they could achieve a certain level of self-satisfaction and sense of social achievement. If gay marriage were to be accepted in all 50 states, it would cause resentment in many Americans hearts and would put hatred in such a loving and endearing word such as marriage. The only way to achieve progress is to create a separate word to mean the union between two individuals. Some would argue that using a separate word would advocate segregation among society. Different verbiage is the lesser of two evils and would cause less harm than to allow same-sex partners obtain the right to have the label of marriage. By changing tradition, tensions rise among individuals. “But even gay activists admit they are seeking to change the marriage ideal. Eliminating the complementarity of the sexes in marriage changes its essence. It may be old-fashioned to believe women are still necessary to domesticate sexually predatory men. But most social arrangements in which men operate without attachment to women are deeply dysfunctional. Many gay advocates tacitly admit as much” (Forman). There’s the argument where the term “wife” and “husband” are words of endearment and there are so such words that could take their place. Although the term “marriage” would be changed, same-sex partners could still use “my wife” or “my husband” to describe their partner. The word marriage seems to be only referred to in the legal sense. No one asks another person how his or her “married partner” is doing. They ask, “how’s your wife doing?” or “how’s your husband doing?” Claiming that using a separate word to describe a same-sex marriage would develop a negative stigma on the word would be to assume a majority of Americans negatively think of same-sex unionization. Many same-sex marriage advocates fight for the right to marry based solely on the economic and social uplifting it gives them and their partner. “Unmarried couples do not have access to the courts or to the legal and financial guidelines in times of breakup, including rules for how to handle shared property, child support, and alimony or to protect the weaker party and the kids” (Wolfson). Although marriage between a man and a woman offers many benefits in many different aspects in life, it is reserved for only man and woman marriages. The United States is supposed to offer the utmost economic mobility to its citizens and by not allowing a particular individual this advantage in life based solely on their orientation is unpatriotic. Same-sex unionization should still offer as many benefits that marriage offers. By doing this, the argument for same-sex marriage dwindles down to an egotistical debate over obtaining a sense of entitlement and reassurance that an individual is not different. Whether a homosexual wants to believe it or not, her or she is different than most individuals in this society. When homosexuals accept this, and stop demanding and forcing society to accept their ways, the tension and hatred involved in many subjects would be suppressed. Although they are different, they should still obtain every privilege anyone else can obtain. If marriage were looked at more like a bond in which two individuals aim to reproduce, society would be more accepting of same-sex unionization. “Marriage is a reflection of the biological necessity of a one-to-one heterosexual union for procreation, true enough, and it provides a legal framework that strengthens that union for the benefit of all” (Zorn). Only a man and a woman could produce children and be their biological parents, therefore only a man and woman can be married. “More children living in gay homes means more children living lives absent a relationship with at least one biological parent. One needn 't deny the existence of many wonderful gay or adoptive parents to acknowledge that this will result in some emotional pain and confusion” (Forman). Marriage’s primary purpose it to create a stable family setting in which children can be born into and could be raised by two biological parents; one female, and one male. Although a same-sex partnership are capable and qualified to adopt and raise a child, they cannot reproduce, which is the purpose of marriage. Even though an infertile heterosexual couple cannot bear children, they’d still be allowed to marry based on the assumption that they could reproduce whilst they were still physically capable. This can best be described using sports and an example. An excerpt from an article “What is Marriage?” by Sherif Girgis, Robert P. George, and Ryan T. Anderson called "A baseball team has its characteristic structure largely because of its orientation to winning games; it involves developing and sharing one 's athletic skills in the way best suited for honorably winning. … But such development and sharing are possible and inherently valuable for teammates even when they lose their games" (256). The long drawn out debate over the word marriage could best be solved by creating a different word, for a different type of bond between individuals. Society will never accept the term gay marriage nor should they be forced to accept it. Polygamy is based off love and commitment but isn’t allowed under the term marriage. Relative to relative marriages are not allowed based off of blood ties. Same-sex partners fall into the same category and should not be labeled underneath the term marriage. Civil unionization of same-sex partners is essential and should be granted to homosexuals across the nation as well with full entitlement to benefits received by married couples to ensure economic mobility.

Works Cited
Wolfson, Evan. “What is Marriage?” Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. 7th ed. Eds. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007. 98-110. Print.
Girgis, Sherif. George, Robert. Anderson, Ryan. “What is Marriage?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol. 34 (2010): 248-275. Web. 7 Sept. 2012.
Zorn, Eric. “The Tope Six Arguments Against Gay Marriage (and why they all fail).” Chicago Tribune. Mag., 19 May 2012. Web. 7 Sept. 2012.
Forman, Seth. “Five arguments against gay marriage: Society must brace for corrosive change.” New York Daily News. Mag., 23 June 2011. Web. 7 Sept. 2012

Cited: Wolfson, Evan. “What is Marriage?” Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. 7th ed. Eds. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007. 98-110. Print. Girgis, Sherif. George, Robert. Anderson, Ryan. “What is Marriage?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol. 34 (2010): 248-275. Web. 7 Sept. 2012. Zorn, Eric. “The Tope Six Arguments Against Gay Marriage (and why they all fail).” Chicago Tribune. Mag., 19 May 2012. Web. 7 Sept. 2012. Forman, Seth. “Five arguments against gay marriage: Society must brace for corrosive change.” New York Daily News. Mag., 23 June 2011. Web. 7 Sept. 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Article Rebuttal

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Forman, S. (2011, June). Five arguments against gay marriage: Society must brace for corrosive change. Retrieved from http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-06-23/news/29710731_1_gay-marriage-traditional-marriage-gay-advocates…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Bias Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eric Zorn’s newspaper article, “Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage”, tells about six popular arguments against gay marriage, and explains how he believes each is not valid. Zorn wrote this article to persuade opponents of same sex marriage to agree that it should be legalized, and he informs about changes in our society and why he believes gay marriage should be one of these changes. Zorn is trying to tell how over time we have created and destroyed traditions and that gay marriage should be legal because it is harmless to society contrary to popular beliefs that it could lead to legalizing polygamy or that homosexuals have immoral behavior. The author’s bias is shown in this article to be pro same sex marriage because he believes it is not morally wrong because it does not harm anyone. Zorn also states in the introduction, “I 've been informally debating opponents of legalizing same-sex marriage for nearly 20 years…” (Zorn).…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cherlin, A. (2004). The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4) 848–861.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    marriage and family

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What does marriage in the United States and other countries around the world mean? Debunking has five myths about marriage 1- The Universal Nuclear Family, 2-The Self-Reliant Traditional Family, 3- The Naturalness of Different spheres for Wives and Husbands, 4- The Unstable African American Family, and 5- The Idealized Nuclear family of the 1950’s.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within America, the concept of same-sex marriage has recently been under heavy debate. The growing interest in such has created issues concerning politics, society, morality, religion and civil rights. The conflict itself arises due to an abundance of peoples’ own views on whether same-sex couples should be permitted to enter marriage. The 47% of American people opposed” (Alper, Gideon I.,P.L.) fail to acknowledge that we as human beings have the inalienable right to be granted the gift of marriage. Human rights, obviously, apply to every human, including gays. That is, unless, homosexuals are believed to not be humans and rather creatures of lower importance and intellect.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 16614 Words
    • 67 Pages

    ^ Craig A. Rimmerman; Clyde Wilcox (2007). The politics of same-sex marriage. University of Chicago Press. p. 234. ISBN 978-0-226-72001-2. "Clearly homophobia is at the heart of blanket opposition to gay rights policies."…

    • 16614 Words
    • 67 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gay marriage has been the subject of debate for centuries in different areas all over the world. Today, in America, the decision to legalize gay marriage is being debated in each state. To date, there are twelve states that have approved gay marriages; among them are New York, Connecticut, California and more. Many people are against gay marriage because the Bible and other religious books states that marriage is between a man and a woman in order to have children but I believe gay marriage should be legal everywhere. Lesbian, gay, heterosexual or transgender are all humans, and we all deserve equal rights; gay marriage does not harm anyone, individuals or society in general, so why shouldn’t gay people receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples receive?…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Same-sex marriage, the marriage or union between two people of the same gender. The legalization of same-sex marriages is popular topic in todays society. Marriage has been defined as a religious and legal commitment between a man and woman over the course of time. In the past decade same-sex marriage has slowly become a prominent issue in the court system. The question lies should homosexual couples have the same right as heterosexual couples to unite their relationship by marriage?…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage Argument

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Zorne, Eric. "Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage (and Why They All Fail)."…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disney Ending for All

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Eskridge, Williams N., and Darren R. Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse?: What We 've Learned from the Evidence. New York: Oxford University, 2006. Print.…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whether or not to sanction gay marriage has become an intense political debate, especially over the last decade. In his essay “Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal,” Thomas B. Stoddard argues in favor of gay marriages – saying it is a fundamental personal freedom, not one that should be controlled by the government – and I support his stance. In Lisa Schiffren’s “Gay Marriage, an Oxymoron,” she argues that same-sex marriage can’t be understood by society. She says marriage needs to keep with the tradition of being between a man and women. I believe this way if thinking is backwards and simpleminded. Generally, the public is becoming more accepting of people’s sexual orientation. As the blind dominance of Christianity has waned over the years, there has become a greater culture of accepting those with differences. Christianity, as the reader likely knows, has been in steady opposition of homosexuals since the religion really took a stranglehold on society around the fall of the Roman Empire in 500AD. But, gradually, Realism has taken hold as the dominant way of thinking, and society has become more practical in its way of contemplating the acceptance of whether homosexuals should not only be welcomed in society, but be allowed to marry each other. Instead of condemning homosexuals to burn for eternity in the “hot oils of hell,” as Christianity would condone, they should be given the same freedoms as heterosexuals because it is in line with evolutionary logical thinking, it preserves an evolutionary trend towards acceptance and it doesn’t go against any fundamental reasoning from which marriage was designed.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marrige

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Today, many citizens in America are homosexual; it’s just not an uncommon thing. Since it is becoming less of an issue and more accepted than ever, more people are coming out of the closet and wanting to have same sex relationships open ly. Although it is becoming more accepted, much of society still does not like the idea of legal gay marriage. As of now, very few states recognize legal marriage between gays, and it is a problem. In 1968, the U.S. government passed an amendment that states; “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (Qtd. In “Constitutional Topic: 14th Amendment) If this is what our government wrote, doesn’t that mean it applies to every U.S. citizen? Since the Equal Protection Clause was created to include every citizen, whether they are homosexual or straight, the government is completely wrong by trying to ban marriage between two people of the same sex.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legalize: Same Sex Marrige

    • 1621 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Foley, Daniel R. The State of Gay Marriage. Family Advocate v20 n1 p39. Summer 1997…

    • 1621 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Campbell, K., & Wright, D. W. (2010). Marriage today: Exploring the incongruence between Americans ' beliefs and practices. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 329-345.…

    • 2266 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays