1. There has been more than 500 books written about the life and thoughts of Mohandas Gandhi.
This tells us that he was a very influential man in our society 2. an intensely joyful man who instigated a movement based on suffering without limit. 3. Satyagraha is the word that describes Gandhi’s philosophy 4. He rejected paths to truth that focused only on personal salvation or individual enlightenment. And the only path to truth is the path of non-violence. 5. Nonviolence is the supreme litmus test for truth, he discounted any moral or religious system that failed to value the principle of nonviolence. Nonviolence involves the resister to renounce violence in though word and deed, but without a supernatural courage and a willingness to endure great personal sacrifice, it is not possible to adhere to the way of non-violence. 6. Nonviolence in its dynamic condition means conscious suffering. It does not mean meek submission to the will of the evil-doer, but it means putting ones whole soul against the will of the tyrant. I agree that non-violence is also the way of suffering, because to accomplish non-violence, you have to sacrifice a lot, which I also believe is suffering, you begin to suffer without the things you have to accomplish the thing the world needs. 7. I believe people choose nonviolence to solve our problems in the world because it’s the safest way to agree on what is best for everyone. If people are unwilling to abide by the world they live in, then non-violence is the option to change what needs to be changed without any violence or death. 8. I believe that change can happen through non-violence, although I believe that it also depends on the situation that there fighting for. An example would be people who protest animal rights, through non-violent ways , people have been able to accomplish rights for animals that cant speak for themselves. 9. The statement “ an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind” means that nothing will change if you use the same method as what’s being used on you. You’ll both be in the same situation, and nothing would be resolved
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Conflict is inevitable, and constantly present in life. Whether it’s obvious and right in front of your face or hidden beneath a pile of lies someone will always suffer because of it. Although that being said, without it- would we truly understand the importance of peace? There are some out there who believe that some of the greatest triumphs and acts of the human spirit were during times of great conflict such as wars and repression’s. But I believe that these events have caused the most horrific demonstrations of human nature in the act of killing the innocent.…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful.…
- 1138 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Thanissaro Bhikkhu "Non-violence: A Study Guide" Access to Insight, June 7, 2009, Accessed 24 August 2009 Last modified: unknown…
- 1688 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful. India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation. In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non-violence worked. The first condition was that both of them had been colonies of England. And like England both countries thought law was very powerful, more powerful even than government officials. The second condition was the presence of violence. Without the possibility of a violent revolution, the government might not have been willing to change. The third condition was the presence of a leader, Mohandas Gandhi in India and Nelson Mandela South Africa. Each of these men was so charismatic he could lead his followers to a non-violent victory. Both of them gave their lives to the cause. Gandhi was shot by an assassin while Mandela spent almost twenty-seven years of his life in prison.…
- 548 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The main ideas represented in this text are Violence versus non-violence/ pacifism versus direct action, relationships, and the clash of cultures.…
- 1202 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“My religion is based on truth and non-violence. Truth is my God. Non-violence is the means of realizing Him” Mahatma Gandhi. All of the nonviolent protesters believe that society should be based off of truth and nonviolence, that is who his God is. Nonviolence is a movement that enforces strength upon numbers. It is the strongest way of fighting because of the unity it forms. In his nonviolence address to the world, Cesar Chavez applies strong diction, uses logos ethos and pathos, and portrays imagery to expresses his message of the strength that grows through nonviolence.…
- 854 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Juergensmeyer, Mark. "Nonviolence." Encyclopedia of Religion. Ed. Lindsay Jones. 2nd ed. Vol. 10. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. 6645-6649. Gale Virtual Reference Library. 4 Aug. 2011.…
- 1627 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
| |Sanskrit word for |this yoga are karma |to god as the way to |us the path of god |belief in the creator|…
- 852 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Politics in a country are an essential, a must to make it successful proceeding in non-violent resistance would allow the politic branch to prosper. Calm, peaceful talking to one an-others leader creating an agreement, making a compromise is much better than killing innocent people. Participating in non-violent war would allow leaders to communicate without it being hated due to anger of deaths, damage, or money loss. Making politics peaceful and calm would ensure that everyone would have a say in the agreement and that it would be well thought out agreement. Even though the leaders/countries disagree with each other, communicating would be more effective than killing their citizens. If protests and strikes went on instead of war, negotiations could be made to help both parties of the argument at hand.…
- 1391 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
As a theologian, Martin Luther King reflected often on his understanding of nonviolence. He described his own “pilgrimage to nonviolence” in his first book, Stride Toward Freedom, and in other books and articles. “True pacifism,” or “nonviolent resistance,” King wrote, is “a courageous confrontation of evil by the power of love” (King, 80). Both morally and practically committed to nonviolence, King believed that “the Christian doctrine of love…
- 1870 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Although, there are many methods of non-violence, people choose to be violent in this world. My personal experience with violence is a personal conflict that I had seen when I was in Nepal (civil war) I used saw six to ten deaths every day, neighbors used carried dead bodies by my doorway. I live with these scary minutes in my mind. Gandhi said “Nonviolence cannot act…
- 933 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The next ingredient that made non-violence work was each leader accepting jail time. Gandhi spent about six and half years in jail but had no complaints about what would happen to him. In Doc.7 it states, “ I did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box.” As for Dr.King he was proud that he had come this far for his, but knew the fight wasn't over yet. In Doc.8 it states, “Those who had previously trembled before the law were now proud to be arrested for the cause of freedom.With this feeling of solidarity around me, I walked with firm steps towards the rear of the jail.” While, Mandela didn’t care what sentence he faced because he knew the people he would leave behind would finish his duties for him. In Doc.9 it states,…
- 203 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
“Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him." Not always do we need to use violence to express how we feel. Anger, people tend to use violence, but I believe that communication is necessary. Communication would help everyone throughout the world.…
- 677 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nonviolence is the safest option, because violence is dangerous. We put our partners and our children in danger of getting hurt. Not only does violence destroy families, it will destroy communities as well. If we choose violence, not only will our hometowns be destroyed, but we won't even be able to rebuild our relationships with the other groups around us. With nonviolence we can protest, by boycotting and continuing the stay at home campaign. Instead of fighting a war, we can negotiate with the government, so we can have our say in the decisions, that are made. If we try to fight them, they will fight back, bring in the national guard, and make new laws restraining us from living the lives, we are supposed to be living. Violence only creates more violence, and that leads…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays