Preview

Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium According to the United Nations, we are expecting the world population to reach approximately nine billion in 2050. Because of this rapid increase in world population, humans have been looking for cheap, safe, and environmentally friendly energy sources to satisfy the population’s necessities. For the past few decades, the human population has been using coal, oil, and gas as our energy source, but we quickly found out that was not enough. One of the other popular energy sources is nuclear energy, as it is a non-carbon emitting and very efficient source of energy. However, catastrophic events such as the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine, Three Mile Island Accident in Pennsylvania, and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan, forced global leaders to re-evaluate the safety and future of uranium based nuclear energy. Is there an alternative nuclear reactor that is not only cheap but non-carbon emitting, and, most importantly, safe? Although many would argue there is no such thing, I believe nuclear reactors based on the radioactive element thorium promise the world a superior nuclear energy source, and a safe future for humanity.
One of the biggest advantages of thorium is that it cannot be used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium could also be used to produce electricity, it is also used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium is easily expandable, thorium, on the other hand, is extremely proliferation resistant. This huge feature will not only decrease poverty but also war. It will give global leaders the motivation to invest more wealth in their country, and seek resolutions with other countries through peace, not war. Having nuclear weapons may give a country more power, but in the long run, it will only create more hatred and potentially, more wars. Preventing wars will save countries from huge economic, social, and population losses in the future. If these countries invested more money into building thorium



Cited: Cooper, Nicolas, Daisuke Minakata, Miroslav Begovic, and John Crittenden. "Should We Consider Using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors for Power Generation?" Environmental Science & Technology 45.15 (2011): 6237-238. Web. "Thorium." Thorium. World Nuclear Association, Sept. 2014. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. <http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Thorium/>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Its seems that the world is in a constant search of a cleaner, cheaper and safer power plants. Nuclear energy has emerged as a new alternative for power. The first nuclear power plant was built in the 1950’s and is now used all over the world. France receives 80% of their electrical energy from nuclear power plants, however; here in the U.S. we only receive 19% of our electrical energy from nuclear power plants. Whereas nuclear power comes with cons, such as safety concerns, nuclear power is more helpful than it is harmful given that nuclear power is more cost effective and better for the environment.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all these pros, there are still cons about nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants generate large amounts of highly radioactive material. This is from the leftovers, after splitting the uranium atom. You can argue that nuclear waste is a bad thing, but if it is taken care of properly it is not so bad. The highly radioactive rods are kept in cooling pools of water, which not only cools the rods down, but…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently the spotlight has been set on renewable energies to assist with weaning off of greenhouse gas emissions, solving issues with energy independence, and to exploit their inherent renewability. Unfortunately our technology is not quite up to speed economically with our wish to rely completely on renewable energy, thus many non-renewable energies are recognized as viable options to power our economy (Fraser, 2011). The United States’ current position on diversifying with non-renewables consists of oil, natural gas, coal, and the less spoken of, nuclear power. Nuclear power is the process by which a reactor contains a slow explosion called fission, which gives off a positive net amount of energy that can be harvested. Of course the social stigma around nuclear is so strong that even if there were an undiscovered completely safe type of nuclear power plant, justifying the complex science would be challenging. After events such as Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, the vast majority of society believes nuclear energy is nothing more than a death wish. Contrary to popular belief, a safer alternative in nuclear energy has been discovered and has been gaining popularity over the past few years despite the recent tragedy in Japan (Sorensen, 2011). Though newly rekindled, the non-mainstream nuclear power known as Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was discovered in the 1960’s and had been proved to be a very attractive option to the more popular Light Water Reactor (LWR). It all began with nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg, who would graduate from the University of Chicago soon become research director at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Weinberg was given the freedom to experiment with designing multiple types of nuclear reactors including the prominent LWR’s that are in commercial use today. Subsequently Weinberg had noted the potential danger of a LWR and moved on to designing a safer…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the driving force for nuclear reactors is steam, there is virtually zero harmful pollutants put into Earth 's atmosphere. “Nuclear power is the only industry which takes full responsibility for all its wastes, and costs this into the product” in the United States…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thorium

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    substances on the face of the Earth once again? The experts say yes, but the public decides to decline no. The United States stopped making this element with the ban on manufacturing nuclear weapons. But with the continuing problem with our ever diminishing energy sources, some want us to begin using more nuclear energy and less energy from natural resources. This paper is going to discuss other source called thorium that we can use to produce nuclear power, the advantages it's production, and why we should consider using this as a great alternative to our nuclear power production.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power plants provide over 11% of the world's electricity as continuous, reliable base-load power, without greenhouse gas emissions. Although nuclear power can be a great source of "clean energy" supply, it raises greater risk concerns such as nuclear waste management, radiation exposures/accidents, and weapon proliferation. Another is the complex decommissioning required to remove all radioactive material from a plant site. Radioactive waste can remain active for hundreds of years or even to thousands of years. Improper waste isolation from the public and the environment is known to contaminate air, soil, and water supplies and even create serious health hazards or cause death. This can be seen from the effects of the nuclear bombing in Hiroshima during World War II; Five decades after the mishap, children are still born with defects. This brings me to question; why is nuclear energy preferred today by some over alternative sources of energy? Alternatives with less severe possible consequences to the environment like- solar or wind power, considering the dangers nuclear power…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Energy is the best power source, and is the future for the world. It is man-made and almost provides no pollution, it is good for the economy, and it provides the most electricity. With Nuclear energy you will not worry about if coal will last or if it’s raining outside anymore. You will simply flip on a switch like you do now, but you will know that little environmental harm was done in the process. Let’s take a look at the world’s future power source.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the era of global climate change, and concerns about humanity's long-term reliance on fossil fuels, many think the solution lies in alternative sources of energy, including nuclear power. All our nuclear power plants are based on fission: splitting heavy atoms into lighter components in a controlled fashion. Though fission is safe when all goes well, the fuel is radioactive, waste disposal can be problematic, and as the Fukushima disaster showed there is a high cost to accidents.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thorium vs Oil

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thorium would be a clean and inexpensive replacement for oil. Oil is nonrenewable, dangerous to work with, and is destroying our planet. We need to focus on saving this planet one step at a time. The switch to thorium would definitively be a huge step, for the earth,…

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thorium

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For decades, scientists have dreamed about turning thorium an element that their atomic number is 90 and also is less radioactive and produces less nuclear waste than uranium. Making Thorium an alternative fuel for nuclear energy. Thorium is four times more common that uranium 235 and cannot produce meltdown like the two catastrophes on Chernobyl and Fukushima. The reason that thorium cannot cause a meltdown is because his chain reaction can be stopped naturally.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The research investigates the benefits of Thorium as an alternative source of energy. The scope of the essay was focused on four main points: how long reserves of Thorium would last, the benefits of reduced pollution using Thorium reactors, Thorium’s inability to be used in weapons, and its advantage over the current nuclear fuel Uranium. Most sources were found in a database called EBSCOhost, in which there was a concept for a reactor known as the Radkowsky design, two articles, one focusing on the benefits of Thorium by V.B. Ashley and R. Ashworth. The other article was about the implementation, benefits, issues, and commercial feasibility of Thorium. The next source was a TED talk given by Kirk Sorenson who had worked at NASA to develop a source of energy for a lunar community. The final sources were two websites sponsored by the World Nuclear Association, and the other by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The global energy crisis is a gigantic problem, and scientists believe we are on the verge of the runaway greenhouse effect Thorium provides a clean energy source that can power the world for a long period of time. The element is remarkably abundant and efficient. In addition, the use of Thorium reactors would be relatively safe, considering the amount of safeguards present in a reactor, and its inability to be used in nuclear weapons once used in a reactor. The implementation and global use of Thorium reactors must become a reality for a clean and sustainable energy source to power the world.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Energy Research

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many modern environmentalists believe that nuclear power may be the way to go at least for now in terms of power without the release of carbon (a green house gas)…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speeches

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Power is a source of energy which has many benefits. Nuclear energy is less expensive because it is based on uranium which is very accessible. With little amount of uranium a great amount of energy can be produced. It is a reliable source to rely on as there is significant amount of it on the Earth’s crust.(1)…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Energy

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consumption of energy is increasing nowadays so nuclear energy has very importance for energy needs. Nuclear energy is produced naturally and in man-made operations under human control and it is a thriving global industry. A total of 435 nuclear power plants are operating around the world in 30 countries. Also , nuclear energy has some advantages…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays