Preview

Furman v. Georgia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Furman v. Georgia
FURMAN V. GEORGIA In the history of Georgia, as well as in the rest of the United States, execution, or what is better known as the death penalty, was the result of a defendant found guilty in such crimes as murder and rape. In 1972, in the case of Furman v. Georgia the U.S. Supreme Court placed a moratorium, which is a delay or suspension of an activity or law, on the sentencing of Furman for capital punishment. They made the decision to end it in 1976, with the case of Gregg v. Georgia. Several court officials wrote that the use of capital punishment was cruel and unusual and it violated the 8th and the 14th amendments set by the U.S. Constitution. They also expressed similar concerns that it was racially targeting black defendants.
In the Furman v. Georgia case, the resident awoke in the middle of the night to find William Henry Furman committing robbery in his house. When Furman attempted to escape the home he dropped his gun. Upon hitting the ground, the gun discharged and killed the homeowner. The death was a freak accident that resulted in murder. At trial, in an unsworn statement, Furman said that while trying to escape, he tripped and the gun he was carrying fired accidentally, killing the victim. This contradicted his prior statement to police that he had turned and blindly fired a shot while fleeing. Either way, because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was still guilty of murder and eligible for the death penalty under the law at the time. He was tried and found guilty based largely on his own statement. He was sentenced to death, but the punishment was never carried out.
The death penalty was ruled illegal within the United States in 1976 as a result of the Furman v Georgia case. Later, in the case of Gregg v. Georgia, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was allowed, but only in the event that the sentencing was delivered at the time of the trial and that the jury who had sentenced the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether helping customers to fill out government forms is an act of engaging in unauthorized practice of law for paralegals?…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 1970's two court cases were being held in the supreme court about cruel and unusual punishment. Ingraham Vs. Wright (1977) and Gregg Vs. Georgia (1976). I choose to compare these because they both favored common good instead of individual rights and had a lot of similar aspects of their trials. During these Supreme Court cases Gregg Vs. Georgia showed more balance between the promoting the common good and protecting the individual rights than Ingraham Vs. Wright showed in 1977.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors describe the history of the death penalty statues in the United States and how…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Henry Furman was was attempting a burglary in a home when he was discovered by the residents. He attempted to flee, and in doing so, he tripped and fell. His firearm discharged and killed a resident of the household. In the police report, he had said that he had turned and blindly fired while fleeing. Regardless of which of the two are true, Furman was found guilty of murder and was eligible for the death penalty under the-extant state law.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Furman v. Georgia decision of the Supreme Court was the first time in history where a higher court had ruled against capital punishment. However, the Supreme Court later suggested new legislation that overturned the ruling that capital punishment was cruel and unusual (Bohm, 1997). Opponents for the death penalty were elated. Executions such as drownings, crucifixions and burning at the stake were carried out for things such as marrying those of Jewish accent, non-confession by criminals and treason (Bohm & Schabas, 199). According to Randa (1997), during the nineteenth century the number if capital crimes were reduced due to many states building penitentiaries to house offenders. The state of Pennsylvania was the first U.S. state to perform…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Stewart was the one to announce this opinion and did to write for Justice Powell, Stevens, and himself. Justice Stewart does believe that capital punishment is seen as ok in the public's eyes and should then be a valid legislative consideration (“Gregg V. Georgia. 428 U.S.153” Justia.org 154). The only way to impose the death penalty was to agree with three circumstances:…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Furman vs. Georgia Furman was convicted of murder and two others for rape. “Juries had convicted Furman for murder and two other individuals for rape—all three were African American—and then imposed the death penalty.” (Source A). "Furman v. Georgia (1972)." American Government. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2010. . The three pleaded that the death penalty is against the eighth amendment, which prohibits any man from suffering cruel and unusual punishment, and when Furman and his counterparts case reached the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional. “So the Court ruled for the first time that capital punishment violated the Eighth Amendment.” “All executions were put on hold following the decision.”(Source B). Hinds, Maurine. Furman v. Georgia and the DEATH PENALTY DEBATE. Berkely Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc., 2005. 79-80. Print. The significance of Furman v. Georgia is that this case was the first case that was ruled violating the Eighth amendment and that it halted…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The establishment of the death penalty dates back to around the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Over the years, the death penalty and its purpose has varied and changed. Furman versus Georgia is what sparked the modern day death penalty era. The Supreme Court Case dealt with an African-American man, William Henry Furman, in which he was convicted of murder. The decision that resulted from Furman versus Georgia enforced many states along with the national legislature to reevaluate their level of capital offense in order to guarantee that the death penalty would not be conducted in an unjust manner. The outcome of the decision from Furman versus Georgia triggered confusion concerning the death penalty. It led…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty, or capital punishment, may be prescribed by Congress or any state legislature for murder and other capital crimes.” (Death Penalty Law Law & Legal Definition.) “The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608. Kendall was executed for being a spy for Spain” (DPIC, 1). Capital Punishment existed in the colonies since the founding of Jamestown. It has been part of our society since it was founded. The death penalty goes back to the 18th century B.C. Britain established the first death penalty laws. People would receive capital punishment for simple things like cutting down trees, stealing grapes and killing chickens. Warren McCleskey was tried and convicted for murder in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, on October 12, 1978 and received the death penalty for his…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCleskey v. Kemp

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case began with Warren McCleskey, an African-American man who was sentenced to death in 1978 for killing a white police officer during the robbery of a Georgia furniture store. McCleskey appealed his conviction and sentence, relying on the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of Equal Protection to argue that the death penalty in Georgia was administered in a racially discriminatory -- and therefore unconstitutional--manner.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman V Georgia

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s time discrimination is a highly used factor when it comes to the way people form their opinions about societal issues as well as different individuals we may come in contact with. We base our perceptions of people off of what only the eye can see rather than getting to know a person for the skills they possess and what the can bring to the table. Back in 1967 discrimination was something that was common to use amongst the white or rich community towards the blacks, poor, or uneducated folks in the south. One situation in particular was a Supreme Court case of Furman v the state of Georgia. As you read throughout this paper I hope you began to form your own opinion about discrimination and the way it is used in our society as well as how this Supreme Court case has impacted the change in the way our judicial system works when it come to a fair and just conviction.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a violation of Furman’s 8th and 14th Amendment rights. The 8th Amendment prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail and fines, and imposing cruel and unusual punishment. The 14th Amendment protects the rights of citizens of the United States, which Furman was. The death penalty decision was very controversial. Many people thought the death penalty was unconstitutional in all instances and declared it to be a cruel and unusual punishment. Also, since Furman was African American, he should not be given the death penalty because of his race. There were many similar cases involving white murderers, but they were not given the death penalty. The Supreme Court declared that they would not administer the death penalty in a discriminatory…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1972, the United States Supreme Court made a declaration claiming that the obligation of carrying out capital punishment was a form of barbaric and abnormal punishment in direct violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. To exemplify the significance of their declaration to the American people, the Supreme Court began to reverse death sentence cases that were brought before them. This ruling by the Supreme Court is known as Furman v. George. Over the span of four years, lawmakers scrambled to create more civilized statutes in order to reinstate capital punishment. In 1976, the Supreme Court walked away from eliminating the death penalty in general. They decided that capital punishment did not unvaryingly infringe on the United States…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expression "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" has taken on a whole new…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays