Preview

Fundamental Principle of Arbitration

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fundamental Principle of Arbitration
Firstly, one of the fundamental principles of arbitration is that arbitration proceedings are private. Parties are agreed to submit the disputes arising between themselves and only between themselves as agreed in their arbitration agreement.
The confidentiality in the arbitration procedures may be seen when the public are excluded and have no right to attend hearing, only the parties to the arbitration agreement and their representatives can attend any arbitration meeting or hearing. In other word, arbitration is the outcome of a private agreement between parties to settle their disputes from the courts, and submit it to the decision of a private tribunal. If the principle of privacy is breached, the arbitration will be effected.
The second principle is confidentiality. It is when that all takes place at arbitration is confidential. Either party or tribunal cannot disclose to third person without the consent of the other except for the purpose of the proper conduct of the arbitration.
However, there is a question regarding to these two principles which is whether privacy automatically results in confidentiality or does it automatically demand confidentiality. There are two main areas of confidentiality which are confidentiality prior to award and confidentiality after award. According to English law, there are two opinions regarding with this issue. First, if it was absence of an express term in an arbitration clause providing for confidentiality, the presumption of confidentiality will applies. Second, the general duty of confidentiality cannot be implied in a silent clause for arbitration in an agreement. However, this opinion has been criticized since it is a break with the general principle of confidentiality.
In Malaysia, there is no doubt that privacy and confidentiality are regarded as essential features for the parties to the arbitration. An arbitrator in breach of the confidentiality requirements would be exposed to misconduct proceedings.
Finally,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    law case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of this arbitration paper is written for arbitration meeting conducted on April 4th 2014 for the incident happened in February 15th.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confidentiality is very important in any organisation since it is the basis of trust between a number of parties. Respecting this trust is vital and information must be handled, exchanged and stored (including both print and electronic information) in an appropriate way so that private information is not jeopardised.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Confidentiality is a non disclosure of personal information regarding a client, other than to those professionals who ‘needs to know’|…

    • 9981 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ARTICLE XVII GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE states Section 2. Step 3. 4) The arbitrator shall not have the authority to amend or modify…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this section I will outline the importance of confidentiality, the policies and procedures surrounding confidentiality, the Data Protection Act 1998 and why it can sometimes be necessary to break confidentiality.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch03

    • 2529 Words
    • 13 Pages

    A submission occurs when one of the parties to arbitration agrees to give up his or her claims.…

    • 2529 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the event that the dispute is not settled during mediation, an arbitration clause will follow. If the dispute cannot be settled within 48 hours after the mediator has been appointed, the dispute will be referred and resolved through arbitration. This clause will be enforced for members who denied mediation and members who were unable to reach an agreement during mediation. The mediator will not be allowed to serve as the arbitrator in arbitration, due to possible bias being present because of intimate information received during mediation. The role of arbitrator will be appointed by all team members, excluding persons with previous or current involvement in the dispute. The arbitrator’s decision shall be final and binding. In the event that a member fails to proceed with arbitration, challenges the…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Explain the Basic Principles of Confidentiality (Including What Information Should Be Available and To Whom)…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The judge should let the arbitration proceed as Mr Groetsch has the right to pursue any action that he believes is necessary to advance his claim. Class action suits normally take longer to prosecute because attorneys want to find and represent as many claimants as possible. Attorneys handling the litigation receive a substantial fee from the compensation settlement whereas the cost of arbitration is minimal. Litigation also requires court fees as well as attorney costs while arbitration may only require the cost of a personal attorney and the fee for the arbitrator. Class action lawsuits are argued in a court of law and may require an extensive amount of time to present evidence and testimony. Arbitration, however, is conducted privately between the two parties and an arbitrator. (All Business 2012 ). The process is more informal and limited evidence is presented. The process can begin as soon as an arbitrator is selected and may only require a short time for resolution. Mr Groetsch may receive a bigger award from his arbitration than the members of the class action suit and his award may set a precedent for the pending litigation giving attorneys addition evidence for their case. The fact that the others may only receive 10 cents on the dollar is irrelevant since they chose to pursue litigation rather than arbitration.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Dickson’s interpretation of the s.8 of the Charter is best viewed as obiter dicta that needs to be taken into consideration for similar cases. La Forest J. provided that “[g]overments at all levels have in recent years recognized [the importance of protecting information] and have devised rules and regulations to restrict the uses of information collected by them to those for which it was obtained” (pg.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acc/325 Phase 2

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Without the security of confidence, auditors would become the enemy. It is highly ethical that auditors never share information or records to anyone that does not have the legal right of disclosure. Private information should never be used for the personal advantage of the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this scenario the arbitration had been implemented mandatorily. The keywords in the contract that binds the customers to this contract of arbitration are the following : “ By signing below, you acknowledge that you consent to the terms of these documents including the binding arbitration provision contained therein (assignment2)”. Binding arbitration eliminates the right to appeal decisions made by the arbitrator. By signing the document all parties forfeit the power to go to any other court system to resolve the dispute. Courts will agree with the arbitration decision because of the fact the contact was valid.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In general, U.S. courts have long favored enforcement of arbitration awards. As the Second Circuit noted in Diapulse Corp. of America v. Carba, Ltd. 37 a case decided under the Federal Arbitration Act, [t]he purpose of arbitration is to permit a relatively quick and inexpensive resolution of contractual disputes by avoiding the expense and delay of extended court proceedings.... Accordingly, it is a well-settled proposition that judicial review of an arbitration award should be, and is, very narrowly limited. 38 As another court has expressed this view, "[lt is not the function of a district court to review the record of an arbitration proceeding for mere errors of law or fact."'39 These public policy concerns apply with even greater strength…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Agreement cannot be modified in any way except in writing signed by all the parties to this Agreement.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics