Preview

Friedman -vs- Drucker

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Friedman -vs- Drucker
Abstract
Business ethics is a form of applied ethics that scrutinizes ethical principles and moral or ethical problems that occur in a business environment. In the more conscientious marketplaces of the 21st century, the demand for more ethical business processes and actions (referred to as ethicism) is mounting. In addition, pressures for the application of business ethics are being exerted through enactment of new public initiatives and laws (Cuizon, 2009).

Friedman Vs Drucker
Milton Friedman and Peter Drucker both were noted management authorities; Milton Friedman primarily was an economist and even won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1976 when the Nobel Prize held more honor than it does today. Both operated in a different time, however. Their views of ethical behavior and social responsibility cannot be seen as being complete in today 's business environment.

Milton Friedman
Milton Friedman (2002) has maintained, since the 1960s, that the purpose of any business is to maximize profits and so return as much value for shareholders as possible. Friedman (2002) holds that the current trend toward greater corporate social responsibility is in direct opposition to this position:
Woodbury (n.d.) quotes the 1970 article, "The social responsibility of business to increase its profits" that appeared in a compilation. In that article, Friedman (1991) states:
There is one and only one social responsibility of business - to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud (p. 245).
Friedman (1991) clarifies his position in saying that the pursuit of profits is not the game with no rules. Rather, it is the responsibility of the organization to engage "in open and free competition without deception or fraud" (Friedman, 1991; p. 245).
A very different view of the organization as a profit machine only, but it



References: Bruno, M. (2002). Breaking Point: The mania for maximizing profits is taking its human toll. And that toll is costly to banks. But, in the current environment, can anything be done about it? US Banker, p. NA. Chen, M. (2001). Inside Chinese Business: A Guide for Managers Worldwide. (Boston: Harvard Business Press). Cuizon, G. (2009). What is Business Ethics? Ethical Principles Practiced in Business. Retrieved from http://businessmanagement.suite101.com/article.cfm/what_is_business_ethics#ixzz0eEPi WJSB on January 29, 2010. Dobson, J. (1989). Corporate Reputation: A Free-Market Solution to Unethical Behavior. Business and Society, 28, p. 1. Retrieved from http://bas.sagepub.com/cgi/pdf_extract/28/1/1 on January 29, 2010. Drucker, P.F. (1981). What is business ethics? National Affairs, 63. pp. 18-36. Retrieved on January 29, 2010 from http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/what-is-business-ethics. Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Hoffman, W.M., and Moore, J.M. (1982). What is business ethics? A reply to Peter Drucker. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1982) 293-300. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/l37t8p6180084058/fulltext.pdf?page=1 on February 8, 2010. Shaw, B. (1988). A Reply to Thomas Mulligan 's "Critique of Milton Friedman 's Essay 'the Social Responsibility of Business to Increase its Profits. '“ Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7). Retrieved on January 29, 2010, from http://philpapers.org/rec/SHAART-2. Witt, S. (2000). International Business Can Be Social Minefield. San Diego Business Journal, 21(25), p. 25. Woodbury, M. (n.d.). The Bout of the Century? Information Ethics vs. E-Commerce. Ubiquity. Retrieved from http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/m_woodbury_1.html. on January 29, 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fieser, J. & Moseley, A. (2012). Introduction to business ethics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stanwick, P. A., and Stanwick, S. D. (2009). Understanding Business Ethics (Vols. 1 - 1, pp. 8-12). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fieser, J. & Moseley, A. (2012). Introduction to business ethics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUPHI445.12.1/sections/sec9.7…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Test of Transition

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages

    References: Velasquez, Manuel G. (2006). Business Ethics: Concepts and Case, (6th Ed.). USA: Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle, River New Jersey.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman criticizes business managers who engage in socially responsible behavior by using the argument that there is a different set of criteria for social responsible behavior of a person, who happens to be a corporate executive (businessman) versus that same person acting as an individual in a free-society. A business manager’s main responsibility is to maximize the profit of the corporation. When that person combines those roles and directs a corporation to take on a social responsible cause, because it would either increase cost or decrease revenue, it would be equivalent to a tax on the customers, shareholders and employees without their consent and in some cases, knowledge.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fieser, J. & Moseley, A. (2012). Introduction to business ethics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved from Ashford.edu.…

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miller, B. (2003-2011). What is the Importance of Business Ethics. Retrieved 6/ 7, 2011, from…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freeman vs Friedman

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milton Friedman’s article went into grave detail the social responsibilities of an individual vs. the social responsibilities of a business. He also explained the duties of the businessman: legislator, executive, and the jurist. He couldn’t understand how some businessman could be so “clear headed” regarding matters internal to their business but so “muddle headed” in matters outside their business in matters critical to their business’s survival. According to Friedman, there is one social responsibility for a business “engage in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” My personal reaction to this article was that it was very difficult to read and comprehend. I had to reread the article and several sections of it several times to figure out what Friedman was trying to convey. I agree with Friedman’s one social responsibility for a business. However, when compared to Freeman’s article, his message was much clearer and defined better than…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What do you think about the social responsibility of businesses? Do you think they have certain social requirements or should the main objective of a business be to make money? This is a very in-depth and valid question in which both Milton Friedman and Robert Almeder have strong opinions. Although their opinions are polar opposite they have valid arguments. The objective is to analyze both opinions from their perspective point of views based on the examples given in the text. A mixture of both positions would provide a common ground for all people involved.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics 101 Week 1

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages

    • ‘The one and only social responsibility of business is to make profits’ (the economics guru Milton Friedman)…

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Friedman, a ‘good’ corporation is not one that undertakes activities only because they are ethically sound, but because they are economically viable. Milton Friedman argued against spending shareholder’s money for anything that does not directly contribute to increasing shareholder wealth or profit. His main argument stems from his views on what constitutes ethical spending. In other words, he noted that it is not appropriate for a corporate executive or director to embark on social objectives or programs because there is little incentive for prudent expenditure, particularly when one is spending money owed to the shareholders through dividends. In addition, companies should not engage in any charitable activities or dedicate…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crux of the issue that Friedman tries to dissect is whether businesses acting socially responsible are effectively imposing a tax on those who invest their resources in such firms. Friedman’s argument centers around two ‘political questions’: whether firms have the appropriate mechanisms for determining the socially optimal use of resources, and whether corporations could recognize the repercussions that would arise from their decisions to assume social responsibilities. Friedman simplifies the two ideas into the argument of principle, and the argument of consequence. In answering both, Friedman determines that it is in the best interests for firms to maximize profits.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics