After reading “ Free schools” by Dewitt Clinton and “Against School” by John Taylor Gatto both have two completely opposite ideas about school and make very valid points. Dewitt Clinton believes that everyone should be educated and schooling should be free so people of all wealth could be educated where as John Gatto believes that not all people need school and in fact by making it mandatory it becomes boring. Gatto argues that school days are too long and seem to be never ending for twelve years, but this isn’t including college. Clinton on the other hand states to improve the ignorance in government education is needed. He says ignorance is the cause of bad governments. Although this is a valid point John Taylor Gatto brings up famous historical industrial leaders and says “ They were not products of the school system,” which proves his point that school should not really be mandatory for everyone. Even though Clinton has a good idea and means well to help society one will feel that Gatto’s arguments is more valid in any society
Dewitt Clinton feels education will help develop a less ignorant government in response to the quote “ Man differs more by man, than man from beast”, “this remark, however generally false, will certainly apply with great force to a man in a state of high mental cultivation, and man in a state of extreme ignorance”. Clinton advises us that there are different types of funds, some larger then others, that help the people pay significantly for an education in the school system. He refers to crime and ignorance as evil and gets this word from the people less fortunate and uneducated for one reason or another to help argue his point, that education should be a main priority an everyone should be educated.
John Taylor Gatto the real reason for public education is to waste time and to teach people how to be bored. Gatto says that in schools when he was teaching he would always ask the students why they were bored and always get...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document