It has been five years since the Hurricane Katrina disaster and the city of New Orleans, Louisiana is healing exceptionally well from this devastating occurrence which took the lives of more than half the city’s population. This occurrence became the most expensive natural disaster the United States has ever endured. According to “New Orleans after Katrina” and Katrina, Five Years Later” there has been a significant amount of improvements in the framework of New Orleans. However, there is still much work left at hand needed to rebuild the city to where it once was or even reform a greater New Orleans pre-katrina. These dramatic changes in development will take years. “New Orleans after Katrina” is an editorial from the Los Angeles Times which was written by an anonymous author. The author talks about the improvements that has happened within the past few years while New York Times’ editorial “Katrina, Five Years Later” speaks more on what should be instituted in order to fully restore from this dreaded disaster. The New York Times editorial brings up a valid point and expresses the problems of the housing system in New Orleans. Therefore the author’s “Katrina, Five Years Later” is written more persuasively than the other because it is a more in-depth introduction to the risk of homelessness.
To begin with, the editorial entitled “Katrina, Five Years Later” claims that authorities need to continue the efforts in restoring neighborhoods that were effected by the hurricane. Nonprofit organizations are still continuing to contribute in redeveloping the city. However the author feels that they should make the most out of these circumstances. They believe that a taxation on such corporations must be instituted in order to restore housing. The city is in desperate need of compensation. The author presents a claim of policy because it is stated what needs to be done in order to solve the current economic problem. Because of the way the author uses examples, in a way they use a combination of both claims of fact and claims of policy. The writer quickly begins with voicing their own opinion, then later elaborates by backing up their claim with convincing evidence by affirming facts. They persuade the audience by stating the problem that New Orleans is recovering from Hurricane Katrina. The major claim presented is that more work towards affordable housing needs to be implemented.
The author appears to present an abundance of evidence that was gathered up by different resources including The Brookings Institution, Greater New Orleans Community Data Center, and Unity of Greater New Orleans. The Brookings Institution is an important resource that was introduced as it is a nonprofit organization that focuses on educating and researching in social sciences especially economic and governmental issues. Greater New Orleans Community Data Center is also a nonprofit organization that focuses on the city of New Orleans. Unity of Greater New Orleans is a social service group that shares business interest. The resources are reliable in which they correlate to the city. According to these sources the general public of New Orleans is not left unattended with nothing to do. The city boasts a busy variety of opportunities including more jobs being provided raising the employment rate as help is needed around the city. Health care facilities have greatly improved as they are more accessible to those in need of assistance. School system has been greatly reformed as it is promoting more academic achievement. However within these wonderful improvements there are a few major flaws. There is a lack of adequate, affordable housing. More than half of city renters spend a fairly large amount of money towards housing, paying more than city renters across the nations.
It can be agreed that this devastating disaster has scarred our nation both physically and emotionally. The writer presents a persuading argument which leaves many ideas stated or not stated...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document