Preview

FINAL ASS ON THINKERS

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
FINAL ASS ON THINKERS
Compare and contrast between Aristotle, Plato and Machiavelli.

There have been many prodigious thinkers through the area of modern society with uncountable diverse themes at the centre of their thinking, numerous of these thinkers, directly or indirectly, have had an touch or have moved alteration to political understanding. Political beliefs discovers its grounds in ancient Greece and its city states, particularly Athens, and the several diverse political structures adopted and established by them. Protuberant thinkers from these times such as Plato and Aristotle and their books The Republic and Politics correspondingly, were some of the first minds to form, dispute and disagree about political thoughts and have noticeably swayed one great mind after another. It rapidly came to light the significance and greatness political thought had, and unquestionably would have, on the world for, probable, the rest of cultured being. Later prominent thinkers comprise names such as N. Machiavelli who was present during the European Renaissance period and, in his works The Prince (1513) and The Discourses on Livy (1517), points out many ideas mainly regarding how to gain then sustain power and the welfares of a republic society. J.J. Rousseau, J. Locke and T. Hobbes did greatly for the development of ideas about the social contract with work on how and why humans left the “state of nature” and shaped societies and the inferences of them doing so and what the ideal state would be.
Aristotle who was a Greek seeking the truth, a theorist, and a scientist. His teacher’s name was Plato. Aristotle is commonly recognised as the most projecting olden philosopher in many parts of philosophy, along with political theory. His life seems to have persuaded his political belief in diverse conduct: his biological awareness has mixed in his political life. His political interest also and his sympathy for the democratic system like dominion possibly have been positive by his experience of



Bibliography: Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.). 1994-2007. Regents of the University of California. May 1st 2007 <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/aristotle.html> Ross, David Lear, Jonathan. Aristotle: the desire to understand. The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambrige, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. Aristotle, 1998. Politics. Translated by E.Barker. Oxford. Berlin. I., 1981. The Originality of Machiavelli in N. Warburton., D. Matravers., J. Pike, ed. Reading Political Philosophy: Machiavelli to Mill. London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 43-57. Cockburn, P. 2003. Britain’s Role In Shaping Iraq. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2719939.stm [accessed 17 October 2009] Machiavelli, N., 2009 Yack, B., 1985. Community and Conflict in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy. The Review of Politics, 47(1), pp.92-112.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and classical Greek learning: Some works of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 b.c.e.) had always been known in Western Europe, but beginning in the eleventh century, medieval thought was increasingly shaped by a great recovery of Aristotle’s works and a fascination with other Greek authors; this infusion of Greek rationalism into Europe’s universities shaped intellectual…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please respond to the questions in bold. All your responses to this assignment should be based on the information given on “Was Aristotle Right or Wrong?”…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Machiavelli and Odysseus

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Ledeen, Michael. Machiavelli on Modern Leadership. New York: Truman Talley Books and St. Martin 's Griffin, 1999. 112-149. Print.…

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle: Greek philosopher; teacher of Alexander the Great; knowledge based on observation of phenomena in material world.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When examining the political philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli one should not expect to reach a hasty or even concrete conclusion; instead an inconclusive conversation on a topic that is unfathomably complex. In much of the contemporary literature concerning the writings of Machiavelli, he is portrayed as the classical Florentine ‘civic humanist’- a tradition awarded to ideals of nationalism, republican government and civic duty. As it is often supposed, Machiavelli was no pioneer of political thought or herald of modernity however his intrinsic study of the contemporary political environment of his time, inspired him to write veraciously on the necessary course of actions needed to acquire and secure a state. Calicles and Thrasymachus, who set forth the evil doctrine behind closed doors, are Platonic characters and the Athenian ambassadors, who provided a similar doctrine on the island of Melos in the absence of the populous, are Thudydidean characters. Machiavelli openly proclaims a seemingly evil doctrine which writers before him taught only covertly…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Final Cause

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay I will begin by extracting the arguments from the extract, outlining Aristotle’s explanation of the four ‘causes’ and arguing why Aristotle has reasons for believing this. In order to achieve a considered and…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Research Paper

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Machiavelli revolutionized the way the worldviews politics. However, when we read his writings today, the ideas don’t seem very revolutionary. This is because his thoughts came to embody political structure. Machiavelli is known for being the first political philosopher to apply realism to politics. Machiavelli wanted to find a solution to his dark reality. Machiavelli’s The Prince presents us with the reality of the political arena, and provides us with the tools to work with human nature and its shortcomings.…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Logos Ethos Pathos

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Henning, Martha L. "A General Summary of Aristotle 's Appeals . . ." Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument For Morality

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli exemplifies the Romans as the standard for a wise prince, who ought to anticipate all present and future troubles; this is his foundation for all wise judgement. However, the Romans also had to anticipate foreign threats; thus all cruelty is excusable under the necessity of protecting themselves. Self-defence from an invasion is both a response to classical and Christian moral thinking, according to Major. It can become a “limitless licence of action,” though only prudence and vigilance offer true protection from the “natural difficulties of political life.” At the heart of Machiavelli’s political philosophy is the solution to such difficulties of political life: moral teaching. But the writers of antiquity, though they were realistic, envisioned an order of morality, that, according to Major, offers hope that a non-Machiavellian approach to politics…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Machiavelli

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy is an academic practice that dives into the study of the nature of things including knowledge, and existence. Its context of the norms of society and the reasons behind these norms are studied by philosophers whom include Thomas Hobbes and Nicolas Machiavelli. These two recognized philosophical minds have delved into the concept of a ruling government body, including governments and royalty. Hobbes penned the famous Leviathan while Machiavelli wrote the controversial The Prince. Both of these books include a deep look into powerful people and their ways of keeping peace and functionality in their given societies. Since the two came to their conclusions through different means, it is easy to see where the two would disagree; one wrote based on a logical standpoint of what should help a society run smoothly, and the other wrote based on what he actually observed and situations he studied. However, even though there are differences of writing between these two philosophers, there are both similarities and differences between their observations and conclusions about governors and the governed. While both Hobbes and Machiavelli believe in a very pessimistic view of society as a whole, their opinions differ in relation to the rulers’ treatment of their people.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalizing Marijuana

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Mallison, Jeffrey. Commentary of Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics. Renaissance Quarterly, spring 2007, Vol. 60, Iss 1, p.208-209. 2p…

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays