You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Federalist were who argued for a strong national government to provide order and protect rights of people and claimed that the bill of rights was unnecessary. On the other hand the Anti- Federalist argued for a weak national government and wanted to add the Bill of Rights to protect the people against abuses of power. A number…
- 3046 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Federalist’s structure of government is superior to that of the Anti-Federalists because we have a better idea of how the government should be run. The Anti-Federalist’s want to include so many things that we do not need like a bill of rights, and a set number of representatives from each state.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the year 1787, early America, officials and delegates came together to form a constitution that would restore the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the attempt at creating a government for the newly independent America. But, it soon became clear that the document was not strong enough to govern America. Therefore, delegates who came to be known as Federalists and Anti-Federalists issued major arguments on the ratification of the U.S Constitution. Federalists were individuals who wished to unify the 13 states in negotiation, and anti-federalists were individuals who wanted a weaker central government. George Washington and the federalists argued that a stronger central government would accommodate everyone including farmers and merchants. Meanwhile, the leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, reasoned that the development of this constitution may threaten the rights of people in the states. While the federalists and anti-federalists were arguing over how much power the government should hold, they eventually made compromises and ratified the U.S. Constitution. With these compromises the delegated created a constitution that still governs us to this day.…
- 1046 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification…
- 477 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…
- 409 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that the Federalists and their intentions are for the greater good. They are simply asking for the equal power throughout the country. The Federalists also wanted to avoid conflicts among the branches if its government. The Federalists influenced equal opinion which would make everything more understandable. Finally, the Federalists stood for everyone being included and accounted for. Being a Federalist is a good choice for the…
- 505 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Articles of Confederation already had the majority of people confused and gaining too much involvement. The National Government was unable to request or collect taxes along with enforce law. This was financially devastating and the nation truly did need a change. People were slowly seeing that.…
- 440 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The federalist called for a strong central government, a federal bank and an army. They proposed a new constitution, while the Anti-federalist wanted to remain under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-federalist planned for the almost unavoidable corruption of a powerful central government. They wanted true federalism, a much better plan for our country long term.…
- 819 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Finally, the federalists protected all the things that they gave to the people. They maintained the army and made sure also that they had a militia that was ready to defend the country when the time called for it. The anti-federalists tried to do the same, but they were not able to get rid of the threats of the Indians on the western and southern fronts. Finally, at the end of the war of 1812, when the federalists were still in power, the Indians were all either conquered or they signed treaties that allied them with the Americans. In this way, the federalists were able to better protect the people. Another few points that prove that the federalists were superior to the anti-federalists are that the federalists were successful in their attempt to rule the country and to keep it running, while the anti-federalists failed, and they were able to draw up a constitution that lasted for a very extended length of time. This meant overall that the federalists had a more lasting effect on the way that our country was run, and in this way displayed the kind of strong, long-lasting government that would be worthy of the title "City on a Hill". In conclusion, the ways that the federalists were superior to the…
- 713 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Washington reluctantly took the position as America’s first president in 1789. He was the first and only president to be unanimously elected and reelected. It was said that Washington was elected because he was trustworthy, courageous, tall, charming, and honorable. Washington believed in following the Constitution. He was basically responsible for creating the government that America still lives and abides by today. He believed that Congress’s job was to make the laws and that it was the president’s job to carry out and enforce them. Washington understood the power of trust and respect. In events such as the French Revolution and the signing of the Jay Treaty, the people did not initially agree with Washington’s decision. Still, Washington trusted that the people would come back to him and understand; he was right. Compared to later presidents, Washington was far from impressive. He had never been to Europe, knew no foreign languages, had little former education, and was not a great writer or speaker. He basically had to be put into a class by himself. Washington hated dividing into groups, and rarely took sides. George Washington was just an all-around good person. He had great character, morals, and the respect of most americans. Henry T. Tuckerman once said about Washington, “The world has yet to understand the intellectual efficiency derived from moral qualities- how the candor of an honest, clearness of an unperverted mind attains results beyond the mere…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the two primary political parties at the time the Constitution was written. However, these two groups preferred different types of government. Nevertheless, Federalists wanted a government that was strong and powerful at the heart and was ruled mostly by the upper class, while Anti-Federalists preferred a government that wasn’t ruled so much by the central government, but more ruled by the states so that they could have their own rights.…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are different forms of federalism, with the amount of component units varying from one country to another. There are fifty units in United States, which is dissimilar in size and wealth. Besides that, different units have different levels of centralization. Federalism can be presidential system or parliamentary system. The US uses a presidential system of federalism. The US Supreme Court is in charge of resolving conflicts between the federal government and its constituent units. Even the US federalist system has numerous benefits, it also has its share of shortcomings (Katz 11).…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the beginning before the Constitution was drafted, the founding founders were concerned about how to solve the issue of a weak central government. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had different ideology and views in regard to the issues at hand, but had the common goal of ensuring the government would be protected against any assembly having the ability to become overpowered by another.…
- 291 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays