Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…
The Paper articulates the collective findings of those present at the Roundtable. Wanna makes comment on some main themes that emanated e.g.whilst considerable faith was placed in a clearer demarcation of governmental roles and responsibilities to address federalism’s perceived current ‘malaise’, Wanna notes there was nothing put forward to firmly support this assumption and consequentlyquestions the true worth of articulating and clarifying roles and responsibilities.…
The legislatures of Louisiana are in session at the present moment attempting to find answers for the state’s budget crisis. Like other states, the budget of Louisiana has been in shambles for years, as legislatures try to find solutions suitable for all citizens. The topic of discussion stem from Gov. Bobby Jindal’s tax swap plan, House Speaker Chuck Kleckley’s backing alternate state budget negotiations, education, and other issues facing the state of Louisiana at this present moment in time. Decisions are being made, which should benefit the citizens of Louisiana.…
When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.…
On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…
The point of the Joseph Ellis writing this book was is to expose the reader to historical events that would eventually lead up to the formation of the United States government’s present and future generations. He achieves this point by exploring and speaking about the challenges that the founding…
Patronage is the ability for officials to make appointments to offices and confer grants licenses, or special favors (Lowi, et. all, 2014). Before FEMA, natural disaster relief was the responsibility of more than 100 federal agencies (Smith, 2005); however, due to pressure from state governors for better response time and better overall responses, President Jimmy Carter established FEMA in 1979 (Smith, 2005). Unfortunately, the lack of natural disasters during that time stimulated multiple scandals and assisted with making FEMA the “patronage parking lot”. This lack of natural disasters made it easier for presidents, like George Bush and Ronald Reagan, to appoint persons with little to no emergency planning experience at all. Federalism was another government institution explained within this article; federalism is the division of power and functions between the national and state government. There is a great debate on who is at fault for more action not being taken sooner; however, it is more per view of authority. Even though the reserved powers clause in the constitution reserves the rights to the states to make decision that are specified in the constitution, it is still the job of the federal government to assist and aide states when they have requested it. With dual federalism, the two a supposed to work congruently; however, this is not an exemplary example of the federal government collaborating well with the state government. This does accurately represent the political culture in several instances. A major example is the racial/social class discrimination is evident within the government working. For years, there has been an improper representation and lack of care for minorities and lower class citizens because they’re not wealthy and therefore cannot hold a significant impact in political…
The time for a new government came about in times of fear, many men such as William Livingston wondered “if the republic could even survive another decade” for Henry Knox made an excellent point in declaring “Our present federal government is a name, a shadow, without power, or effect”. Meantime the relationship between the states was poor and there was an uncertainty if they would even remain united what with the debts, the economic turmoil, and the slow realization that without England they had no protection from the outside world. The question on everyone’s mind was, is there anything that can be done to save their country? 55 delegates gathered in hopes of answering this question with a brilliant solution of their own.…
3. How does this issue affect our government at the local, state, and national levels?…
"The Storm: Chaos and Tragedy": Answer the following questions as you view the PBS video excerpt "Chaos and Tragedy."…
Sheffield, L.B. (2013, May 15). 13 Ways the 113th Congress Can Improve Education in America. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.heritage.org/research…
0 4 ‘Members of the US Congress are too concerned with local matters and not concerned enough with issues affecting the whole country.’ Discuss. (30 marks)…
The author aims to inform the reader of the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for reform of federalism by summarizing the discussions of the round table held in May 2007.…
Mr. Chairman, the public mind, as well as my own, is extremely uneasy at the proposed change of government. Give me leave to form one of the number of those who wish to be thoroughly acquainted with the reasons of this perilous and uneasy situation, and why we are brought hither to decide on this great national question. I consider myself as the servant of the people of this commonwealth, as a sentinel over their rights, liberty, and happiness. I represent their feelings when I say that they are exceedingly uneasy at being brought from that state of full security, which they enjoyed, to the present delusive appearance of things. A year ago, the minds of our citizens were at perfect repose. Before the meeting of the late federal Convention at Philadelphia, a general peace and a universal tranquillity prevailed in this country; but, since that period, they are exceedingly uneasy and disquieted. When I wished for an appointment to this Convention, my mind was extremely agitated for the situation of public affairs. I conceived the republic to be in extreme danger. If our situation be thus uneasy, whence has arisen this fearful jeopardy? It arises from this fatal system; it arises from a proposal to change our government—a proposal that goes to the utter annihilation of the most solemn engagements of the states—a proposal of establishing nine states into a confederacy, to the eventual exclusion of four states. It goes to the annihilation of those solemn treaties we have formed with foreign nations.…
After reading the Federalist #10 paper, I found two statements that I thought were most important. The first was James Madison discussing the common people’s thought process. He believed the public’s complaints and dissatisfaction was inevitable due to the government’s instability. The publics common good and welfare will always be disregarded and not acknowledged to its full potential. He stated that outcomes and results were usually decided without accordance to justice. No one wanted to follow the rules either. Unfortunately, the minor parties are usually disregarded and go unrecognized and unheard.…