Preview

Factor Influence Organisational Change

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6045 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Factor Influence Organisational Change
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0953-4814.htm

Factors influencing organizational change efforts
An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences
H. Jack Walker, Achilles A. Armenakis and Jeremy B. Bernerth
Department of Management, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the integrative influence of content, context, process, and individual differences on organizational change efforts. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from employees involved in a recent de-merger. Using structural equation modeling, a hypothesized model that integrated individual differences with change content, context, and process factors was tested. Findings – Results led to the acceptance of a model indicating that change context mediated the relationship between individual differences and change process and content. Similarly, change content and process mediated the relationship between change context and organizational change commitment. Research limitations/implications – Owing to the nature of the study, inferences of causality cannot be made. Additionally, common method bias may be a concern because criterion and response variables were collected at the same time. Practical implications – An organization’s prior change history (i.e. context) has the potential to negatively influence change success. In order to counteract these effects, change agents should concentrate on clearly communicating the change details (i.e. process) to employees. Originality/value – This study is one of the first to integrate factors common to all change efforts, i.e. content, context, process and individual differences. Further, it elaborates on how these factors interact to influence change success. Keywords Organizational change, Employee behaviour, Change management, Corporate communications Paper type Research paper



References: Armenakis, A.A. and Bedeian, A.G. (1999), “Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 293-315. Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G. and Feild, H.S. (1999), “Making change permanent: a model for institutionalizing change interventions”, Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 12, pp. 97-128. Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G. and Mossholder, K.W. (1993), “Creating readiness for organizational change”, Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp. 681-703. Ashford, S.J. (1988), “Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 24, pp. 19-36. Atwater, L.E., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, D. and Cartier, P. (2000), “An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 53, pp. 275-97. Bentler, P.M. (1990), “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, pp. 238-46. Bray, D.W. (1994), “Personnel-centered organizational diagnosis”, in Howard, A. et al. (Eds), Diagnosis for Organizational Change, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 152-71. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2, pp. 40-57. Budner, J. (1962), “Tolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 30, pp. 29-40. Byrne, B.M. (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. Integration of change factors 771 JOCM 20,6 772 Coch, L. and French, J. (1948), “Overcoming resistance to change”, Human Relations, Vol. 1, pp. 512-32. Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 555-90. Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P. and Barron, K.E. (2004), “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 115-34. Galpin, T. (1996), The Human Side of Change: A Practical Guide to Organization Redesign, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Haveman, H. (1992), “Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 48-75. Herscovitch, L. and Meyer, J.P. (2002), “Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, pp. 474-87. Hinings, C.R. and Greenwood, R. (1988), The Dynamics of Strategic Change, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Holmbeck, G.N. (1997), “Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 599-610. Hu, L-T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 1-55. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Judge, T.A., Thoreson, C.J., Pucik, V. and Welbourne, T.M. (1999), “Managerial coping with organizational change: a dispositional perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 107-22. Judson, A. (1991), Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA. Kelly, P. and Amburgey, T. (1991), “Organizational inertia and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal, pp. 591-612. Kotter, J. (1995), “Leading change: why transformation efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, pp. 59-67. Lewin, K. (1947), “Frontiers in group dynamics”, Human Relations, Vol. 1, pp. 5-41. McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T. (1986), “Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 54, pp. 385-405. McLain, D. (1993), “The MSTAT-I: a new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, pp. 183-9. Meyer, A., Brooks, G. and Goer, J. (1990), “Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: organizational responses to discontinuous change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 93-110. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1984), Organizations: A Quantum View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Nutt, P.C. (1986), “Tactics of implementation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 230-61. Reger, R.K., Mullane, J.V., Gustafson, L.T. and DeMarie, S.M. (1994), “Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 8, pp. 31-46. Reichers, A.E., Wanous, J.P. and Austin, J.T. (1997), “Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11, pp. 48-59. Rush, M.C., Schoel, W.A. and Barnard, S.M. (1995), “Psychological resilience in the public sector: “Hardiness” and pressure for change”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 46, pp. 17-39. Schneider, B. (1987), “The people make the place”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40, pp. 437-53. Schweiger, D.M. and DeNisi, A.S. (1991), “Communication with employees following a merger: a longitudinal field experiment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 110-35. Snyder, M. (1974), “The self-monitoring of expressive behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 526-37. Staw, B.M. and Ross, J. (1985), “Stability in the midst of change: a dispositional approach to job attitudes”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70, pp. 469-80. Tsoukas, H. (1996), “The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 11-26. Vandenberg, R.J. and Lance, C.E. (2000), “A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, pp. 4-69. Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E. and Austin, J.T. (1994), “Organizational cynicism: an initial study”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 269-73. Watzlawick, P. (1978), The Language of Change, Basic Books, New York, NY. Weick, K. and Quinn, R. (1999), “Organizational change and development”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 361-86. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F. and Summers, G.F. (1977), “Assessing reliability and stability in panel models”, in Heise, D.R. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1977, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 84-136. Corresponding author H. Jack Walker can be contacted at: walkeh1@auburn.edu Integration of change factors 773 To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hrm 310 Week 3

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Leban, B., & Stone, R. (2008). Managing Organizational Change (2nd ed.). Retrieved from The…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hrm 587 Final Project

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages

    “Change can be happen without improving, but cannot be improved with out changing” These days it is becoming highly competitive environment and fast growing where all wants to be ahead and connected to the world. Since past 2 decades we have seen many inventions which created a mile stone and at the same time change our lifestyles in one way or other, which was possible because of the companies investing on R&D and consistence change in the organization.…

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kudler-Ross Model Essay

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anfara &Mertz (2006) explored the theoretical framework for a study done by Kearney & Hyle (2003) on the effects of change on individuals in an organization. The researchers examined change in organizations using the Kubler-Ross (1969) study as their theoretical framework. Kearney had experienced the change at WorldCom when it merged with MCI where she was working as a senior corporate trainer. Later Kearney, while working on her Doctorate, met Hyle, who had studied work related change within an educational environment.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2006). Managing Organizational Change. New York, NY: McGraw Hill - Irwin.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frank Blake, named chairman and CEO when Robert Nardelli resigned is making his own mark on improving the company. Blake has given stores more leeway to select products that are tailored to specific markets, moving away from a more centralized purchasing structure under Nardelli.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theoretical Matrix

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This week’s studies were an examination of organizational and individual barriers to change. We learn to identify the role of strategic renewal, the behavioral aspect of organizational change, analyzed the dynamic of motivating employee behavioral change, differentiated the three faces of change, and finally explored the sources of employee resistance. A primary focus was Lewin’s Field Theory in Social Sciences and for this paper identified three theoretical organization change models.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 Assignment 5

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Oreg, Shaul; Berson, Yair. Personnel Psychology. Autumn2011, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p627-659. 33p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01221.x. , Database: Business Source Elite…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palmer, Ian. Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2006). Managing Organizational Change. Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection…

    • 866 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The phrase ‘change management’ has been defined as “the process of continually renewing an organization’s direction, structure, and capabilities to serve the ever-changing needs of external and internal customers” (Todnem, 2005, p. 369 cited Moran and Brightman, 2001, p. 111). Generally, organizational change can be initiated by managers or come into existence through external pressure or implemented as a result of specific changes in policy and procedures. In brief, organizational change is an effort made by management to have members of the organization to think, behave and perform in a different way (Yılmaz and Kılıçoğlu, 2013 cited Kreitner and Kinicki, 2010).…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although change has become commonplace in modern organizations, the reported failure rates of change implementation range from 40% to as high as 70% (McKay et al., 2013). Considering our global economy and technological innovation, this rate is alarmingly high. It is no surprise that these statistics have prompted researchers to investigate the causes underlying change failure in modern organizational settings (McKay et al., 2013). Employee resistance has been identified as a primary source of change implementation failure across a range of organizations and industries worldwide (McKay et al., 2013). Change is a situation that interrupts normal patterns of organization and calls for participants to enact new patterns, involving interplay of deliberate and emergent processes that can be highly ambiguous for everyone involved (Ford et al., 2008). Employees resist change for a variety of more or less logical reasons (Baack, 2012). These reasons will be explored to understand the external and internal factors of change within organizations. In addition, a scenario will be presented to analyze how change was introduced, perceived, and implemented at a real life organization.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organizational change is difficult, although necessary to support growth and excellence in the market place. The concept of change can have negative connotations among employees, especially if change implementations have not been successful in the past. This paper is going to describe the need for change, barriers to change, factors that might influence change, readiness for change, the theoretical change model that relates to the change, and resources that support change implementation.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories of change describe the effectiveness with which organizations are able to modify their strategies, processes, and structures. The rate of major organizational change has accelerated dramatically in this decade. Experts have estimated that 30 years ago, the largest companies typically had only one or two simultaneous enterprise-wide change initiatives; however, according to a corporate executive board CEB organizational research available today: A typical organization has undertaken five major firm-wide changes in the past three years; 73% of the organizations expect a greater number of changes over the next three years; only 34% of the organizations are clearly successful at managing change. Major change initiatives are not limited to big companies. According to the society human resource management SHRM (2007) change-management survey report, 80% of organizations had planned or implemented major organizational initiatives requiring change management during the previous 24 months. Different organizations use different organizational change models to remain competitive in the marketplace (e.g., the positive model; the action research model; Lewin's model; Kanter, Stein, and Jick, 1992; Kotter's model, 1996; and Luecke model, 2003) all of these studies showed that leadership is the key factor for the process of change. As change initiatives have become more frequent and widespread, the importance of managing individuals through change has gained credence. Many corporate leaders have concluded that failing to manage employees through change can be costly. Employees who are dissatisfied with or upset by a change are generally less…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Heart of Change, written by John P. Kotter and Dan S. Cohen, reflects upon change and its influence on organizations. Kotter and Cohen claim that change is the only constant. By focusing on change management through the behaviors of people, the authors claim that an eight step process to alter organizational changes is possible and can lead to successful outcomes. The author demonstrates the success of change management through real life scenarios that influenced and motivated change in that particular organization. John M Ivancevich’s Organization Behavior and Management focuses on behavior and management within work settings. The Heart of Change and Organization Behavior and Management correlate with one another by addressing how change is vital for any organization. The main themes of both books can be summarized by the following statement: “In order to make any transformation successful, you must change…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gilley, A., Gilley, J. W., & McMillan, H. S. (2009). Organizational Change: Motivation,Communication, and Leadership Effectiveness. performancexpress. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from www.performancexpress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Organizational-Change-Motivation.pdf…

    • 3020 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Prussia, G. E. (2008). Employee Coping with Change Organizational Change: An Examination of Alternative Theoretical Perspectives and Models. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 1-36. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00104.x…

    • 1571 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics