Explain why Russia was a difficult country to govern before 1905
* Russia is a very big country so it would be hard to keep it all under control. One-sixth of the world.
* Because it was big it was hard to communicate with people with the lack of technology they had.
* It was also hard to get to place so it would be hard to keep people under control if something happened as it would take a long time to get there.
* Because of the geographical landscape of Russia it was hard to get trade into Russia.
* There were many different tribes and religions so many people wouldn’t help or talk to each other.
* Not everybody spoke Russian as many neighbouring countries started where taken by Russia but didn’t speak Russian.
* Lack of communication.
* Many different religions
* People would start little conflicts between religions.
* It was hard to get the army to a certain place of Russia if there was a war because of the size and geographical landscape.
* Many people wanted rights and a democratic government but other people wanted the opposite. This made people unhappy.
* The economy was bad as it was hard to collect money or even get money because of the sheer size of Russia.
* Many people ruled Russia within 30 years before 1905. This made it hard for the country to get used to the laws if they changed. * Laws were hard to imply as the country was the biggest in the world.
How far were these difficulties likely to cause problems for the tsarist government in the first decades of the twentieth century?
There were many difficulties that caused problems for the tsarist government. One main reason involved politics and how the country was ruled. The Russia of the tsars in the 19th century was a monarchy. The Tsarist government experienced many difficulties with the opposition. There were many political parties who disagreed with the policies of the Tsar.
The aim of the Liberals was to introduce parliamentary democracy similar to those in the USA, France and Great Britain. This group achieved some success with the establishment of the Russian parliament, in 1906. The second major opposition group was the Social Revolutionaries who wished to create a new Russian society based on the traditional community of the peasant village. This would make it hard for the government as the opposition would get other people from Russia to join them and as there were many people in Russia this would make it easy for the parties but hard for the government as they weren’t able to control the people and make them obey by their way of governing the country.
The problems which the Tsar faced had been mostly brought upon himself before there was even a suggestion of war. Throughout his reign, Tsar Nicholas II had increasingly not talked with his people. On his orders, Cossack guards brutally murdered the 1905 revolution, memorialised as ‘Bloody Sunday’, and the 1912 Lena goldfields protests. This would increase to more violence against the Tsar which would eventually lead to the downfall of his government. After this people realised that their leader was not the benevolent idol they had previously adored, but a ruthless official determined to keep order so that he would benefit from it.
Tsar was doomed from the beginning because they could not adapt. Before long, calls for a more representative parliament were being demanded by the people of Russia. This wasn’t good as Russia was the biggest country in the world therefore there would be many people against the Tsar. The best way for Nicholas II to deal with such demands would have been to prevent future unrest by granting them, but this would have weakened the Tsars.
One big problem which may have made the Tsar collapse was World War One as it hit Russia hard and showed the weakness in Nicholas II. This may have forwarded the collapse of the Tsar as the people could see that he was not doing a good job at keeping the country safe.
The main reason which caused the collapse of the government was the sheer size of Russia as it started to be too much too control. This didn’t help the Tsars as they couldn’t communicate that easily with the people who live all over the country as the technology needed to do that had not yet been invented. This would allow the people of Russia to start riots and not get affected by the government. This also meant that laws were being broken and chaos was occurring. As Russia was so big Nicholas II thought that taking control of the army would make less people try to oppose him, but this did not help him as people didn’t think that he should control the army and this would make the people of Russia want to get him out of the government which later happened in 1918.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
How far do you agree that the use of repression was the main reason for the weakness of opposition to Tsarism in the years 1881 – 1914?…
- 648 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…
- 756 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Tsarism thrived for hundreds of years but as Russians became more educated they decided that communism and a dictatorship was too harsh and after a few revolutions Tsarism was a thing from the past. In the years 1881 to 1905 many things changed in Russia for the better and for the worse.…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…
- 1209 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
How far were divisions amongst opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule, 1881 - 1905?…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system.…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tsarist system of government underwent many changes throughout the years of 1881-1914. Both Alexander III and Nicholas II created several modifications, being both good and bad, to the government during these years. Alexander III created mostly negative changes, due to him being seen as a reactionary, whereas Nicholas II created mainly positive changes to the government as a result of the 1905 revolution. These changes can be categorised into political, economic and social modifications.…
- 1624 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The Russian Revolution of February 1917 was not directly attributed to the Tsar’s failure to solve economic problems. There were a wide range of causes to the downfall which can’t be directly associated to the failure to solve economic problems.…
- 944 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Russia was still an autocracy, this meant that the Tsar had complete power and his rules and beliefs could not be challenged. The autocracy system was growing old, people in Russia wanted westernization and democracy, however Nicholas II opposed these beliefs. After the events of…
- 1510 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Russia underwent economic and political reform to a limited extent. Although Peter Stolypin was pushing for reform, he was undermined by the mindsets of peasants and the fundamental law.…
- 1040 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
How effectively did Nicholas II deal with the problems facing Russia in the period 1894 – 1905?…
- 821 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the mid-1800s Russia was an Empire of over 100 years and of considerable size, with its only competitor being the larger British Empire, yet it was a country still firmly stuck in the…
- 1462 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Russia was an Autocracy before 1905 and the Tsar was Nicholas 2nd. Many people dispute over whether he was in control or not, the main factors being: The Tsar’s leadership, Opposition to the Tsar, Social and Economic conditions and finally means of control. It can be argued that some factors are more important than others, but they are all significant in how I believe the Tsar was losing control.…
- 1597 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Most of russias population was Russian but there were significant minorities including Ukrainians, Fins, Poles and Georgians.…
- 285 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…
- 1188 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays