Preview

Explain What Is Meant by ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’, and Discuss Hart’s Objections Towards It.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain What Is Meant by ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’, and Discuss Hart’s Objections Towards It.
Explain what is meant by ‘mechanical jurisprudence’, and discuss Hart’s objections towards it.
The term mechanical jurisprudence was coined by Roscoe pound in his article in 1908. It is the concept that judges apply law rigidly according to precedent and legislation without thought of consequences. In this it is argued that every eventuality that comes before the law is legislated for in advance, it is just for the judges to apply the relevant law. This concept would insinuate that every case that comes before the courts has been legislated for in advance, leaving virtually no room for judicial discretion. Hart has shed some academic light on the matter. In “The Concept of Law” he explains that there are two handicaps whenever we seek to legislate in advance. Hart writes “It is a feature of the human predicament that we labour under two connected handicaps whenever we seek to regulate, unambiguously and in advance… The first handicap is our relative ignorance of fact: the second is our relative indeterminacy of aim.” Hart argues that it is this relative ignorance of fact is what hinders us from being able to legislate in advance and in doing so hinders the judiciaries ability to apply law mechanically. He goes on to depict a world in which the use of mechanical jurisprudence would be suitable. “If the world in which we live were characterized only by a finite number of features, and those together with all the modes in which they combine where known to us, then provision could be made for every possibility.” Clearly a world such as this is amicable and hart uses this to argue that evidently it is impossible for the law to cover all eventualities when the variants in cases are endless. Therefore the question is, how can mechanical jurisprudence exist when the law is unable to envisage every eventuality? Judges would be left blind as to how to apply rulings which don’t encompass the circumstance.
Hart’s second handicap of our relative indeterminacy of aim is



Bibliography: "Mechanical Jurisprudence" (1908), 8 Columbia Law Review 605 “The Concept of Law” H.L.A Hart, Second edition 1994 [ 1 ]. "Mechanical Jurisprudence" (1908), 8 Columbia Law Review 605 [ 2 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages

    (18) Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. “Law 's Ambitions for Itself”. Virginia Law Review, Volume 71, Number 2 (March 1985), pages 173-187.…

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But in unwritten laws, a role that a judge plays in will be in terms of case laws in which it is not locked into any statute but instead judgements that the courts have delivered. And once a case has been decided, future cases with similar fact scenarios will be bound by the earlier decision if the earlier decision is made by a higher court in the same hierarchy or a decision made from the court’s previous decision which will be the doctrine of stare decisis. Thus, a “judge-made law” on a case by case basis.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 4 ]. Dicey, Albert. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution(1885).…

    • 4104 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisprudence Revision

    • 10018 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Exploring the question of how particular laws come to be included within legal systems is a characteristic question of some theories known as theories of legal positivism…

    • 10018 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law in the Modern Times

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argued that there is immunity from conviction unless such a person in provided with counsel at the public expense.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jurisprudence

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Material Sources- Material Sources are those from which is derived the matter though not the validity of law and the matter of law may be drawn from all kind of material sources.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Philosophy

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Law is a command which obliges a person or persons, and obliges generally to acts or forbearances of a class.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) Dworkin’s “third conception of the law” called Law as Integrity is based in part on the assumption that there is a single author of the law. The community personifies expressing a coherent conception of justice and fairness. According to law as integrity, propositions of law are true if they figure in or follow from the principles of justice, fairness, ad procedural due process that provide the best constructive interpretation of the community’s legal practice. Furthermore, Dworkin would approve and support the judges for creating an opinion and setting a new precedent on this case. Dworkin’s Chain Novel concept fits into this case perfectly by adding new precedent which the lawmakers of the time could not foresee. The lawmakers had not created such a provision dealing with this situation but surely did not intend to protect this defendant just because the language of the law was absent.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | The study of jurisprudence started with the Romans. The definitions given by the Roman jurists are vague and inadequate but they put forth the idea of a legal sciece. Every jurist has its own notion of the subject matter and the proer limits of jurisprudence depends upon his ideology and the nature of society. The word jurisprudence used in different languages in different senses. In French it refers "case law". There has been a shift during the last one century and jurisprudence today is envisged in more broader sense than it had understood in Austinian age.The term Jurisprudence is derived from the Latin word "Jurisprudentia" which means either "knowledge of law" or "skill in Law"Many eminet jurists have tried to define jurisprudence some of them will be givn bellow:…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The modern view is that judges do make law. Lord Radcliffe said (Not in Feather Beds, p215, 1968):…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisprudence

    • 5865 Words
    • 24 Pages

    describe the rule of recognition in detail describe what Hart calls ‘the necessary and sufficient conditions of the existence of a legal system’ explain the significance of the rule of recognition for Hart for establishing his particular form of legal positivism discuss critically Hart’s claim that the rule of recognition is identified as ‘a matter of fact’ outline the main arguments put by Dworkin in his criticism of the rule of recognition theory express your own opinion about the ‘ultimate’ criteria of legal validity, supported by reasons describe in general terms the position that Hart takes in the Postscript give an account of the significance of the Postscript (a) for interpreting the main doctrines of The Concept of Law and (b) for understanding law…

    • 5865 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Concepts and Nature of Law

    • 2966 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Bix, B. (2002). “Natural law theory: The modern tradition.” Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.…

    • 2966 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisprudence

    • 9650 Words
    • 39 Pages

    TIM KAYE* INTRODUCTION In their article "The Practical Difference between Natural-Law Theory and Legal Positivism", ' Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword have maintained that if the continuing debate between legal positivists and natural lawyers is ever to get beyond misrepresentation and abuse, jurisprudence must develop a "theory of legal ideology". 2 Only when such a theory has been developed, they claim, shall we be in a position to know "how legal rhetoric 3 arises and affects these [thoughts and acts]". As an interested observer, rather than someone actively involved in the dispute between legal positivism and natural law, 4 I view this call from two of the debate 's major protagonists as a very welcome development for three reasons. First, jurisprudence has too often been limited in its discussion of important issues by a tendency towards exclusively abstract argument, so that:…

    • 9650 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a dearth of theoretical literature on the nature of legal scholarship and a consequent lack of awareness about what legal scholars actually do. Although there is a tradition of theoretical scholarship (or ‘jurisprudence’) within the law, this tends to address abstract philosophical questions about…

    • 4870 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics