Preview

Explain Plato S Concept Of The Forms And The Particular Importance Of The Form Of Good

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Plato S Concept Of The Forms And The Particular Importance Of The Form Of Good
Explain Plato’s concept of the forms and the particular importance of the form of good. (25)

Plato originally thought of the forms because of the concept of beauty. Although we see objects and think that they are beautiful, we never ‘beauty’. Also many different things can be beautiful, but in different ways but they all still have one thing in common, beauty. This leads to Plato concluding that there must be something which is ‘beauty’ that all of these things get it from. This idea of a universal thing that more than one thing can have was the first thought that lead Plato to the forms. Plato also believed that beauty and the thing itself are separate, so although the thing can be destroyed the beauty will not. So some things ‘share’ in the forms whereas some ‘participate’.
Plato’s theory of the forms also derives from the fact that he does not believe that this empirical world is all there is. He was a dualist, which means that he believes that there is a spiritual world, like souls, as well as a material world. These two realms are called the realm of reality and the realm of apperances. In the material world everything is always changing and dying, however, souls are eternal and unchanging. The realm of souls runs parallel to this world.
For Plato the realm of souls is like the forms. Plato’s ideas of the forms are perfect ideas or types of things. The forms were not created and they do not do anything. The forms are timeless, unchanging and beyond space. However, we only know the forms through our intelligence and reason, you cannot actually physicially see them because they are in the realm of forms which Is not achievable by all humans. The way we see the forms is through imperfect copies, like the shadows in the Plato’s analogy of the cave. The reason we can work out what the forms are is from our previous life as our souls lived in different bodies and worlds. Our birth was so traumatic we shut all of our memories from previous lives out. When we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato thought that there were two worlds: the everyday changing world in which we exist, the world of becoming, and the unchanging world of eternal truths, the world of being. In this world of being Plato illustrates that the eidos, or forms, define what a substance truly is and that each and every thing has a Form on which it falls under. For example, we know the Form of a human so any human we come into contact with, regardless of size, shape, or color; we know to put them in the category of human because they fit the eternal Form. Depicted in his allegory of the cave, Plato comes to the belief that our everyday world is thought not to be an illusion but more like a “set…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato uses the Forms to try to show that the soul is eternal. He says that the soul and the body are different things, and the body is just a container for the soul. He even goes further by saying that the soul is trying to get back to its pure state. By these statements Plato is saying that the body is physical, which means that it is only temporary, it changes, and imperfect. On the other hand, the soul is non-physical and therefore is eternal, unchanging, perfect and universal. However, this is insufficient information to base his argument that all souls are the same on. All souls are different because every person is different. If the soul and makes a person and every person is different that means that every soul has its own personality or characteristics. This is shown everyday because know two people are exactly alike, not even twins. Aristotle talks about a similar reason for not following the Forms. Aristotle states that if the Forms are supposed to be perfect and unchanging, how is it possible for one thing to be better than the other. For example, it is like saying that beauty is an eternal Form that doesn’t change. However, in fact it does change because has the ability to be more beautiful than…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anolgy of the cave

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yet others might disagree with this saying that most people still live in the shadow copy of reality and therefore we can have no clear idea of what reality really is. Even though Plato is theoretically mentioning and discussing the concept of reality in his analogy we can’t prove that the spiritual world is real and if the world of forms is not visible by humans then Plato has no evidence to back his teachings so it is arguably not valid and therefore as Plato has no proper understanding about what reality is and what it isn’t there is no way his analogy can tell us anything about the concept of it.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that not only do souls exist but they are also independent of the body with their own agenda to be carried out beyond that of the host. Melinda…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, there are a series of arguments presented by Socrates as proofs for the existence of the soul after death. The final and most convincing argument works as a direct application of Socrates’ idea of the Forms.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, contained within the Realm of the Forms is the perfect version or copy of everything in the world, and everything in the world is just a copy of the perfect version in the Realm of the Forms, hence the Realm cannot teach us about any physical objects in the world if the object in the Realm is different to all the others on Earth. For example, in the Realm of the Forms will be the perfect version of a chair so, according to Plato, all the chairs in the physical world are copies of the perfect version so the perfect chair cannot teach us anything about a physical chair in the world that we know.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lastly, I am going to look at Plato’s view of dualism Plato believes in the connection between the body and the mind which is referred to as dualism. “Plato believed that the true substances are not physical bodies, which are ephemeral, but the eternal Forms of which bodies are imperfect copies.” (Dualism Stanford). This means that it is what is inside of us that makes us who we are which is the mind. It is hard to explain Plato’s dualistic views because it is described on a metaphysical level. Plato does not specify how the soul binds with the body but believes there is a strong continuity between the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As a philosophical treatise, it is to be commended for appreciating the complexity of human motivations, however given our contemporary biological knowledge we can see that the simplified composition of the ‘soul’ espoused by Plato may be untenable. Also, by virtue of the soul being a conglomerate of three distinct forces, this raises philosophical issues regarding the soul’s immortality (that has been and is still affirmed by the author).…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an ongoing debate as to whether Plato’s Theory of Forms truly teaches us anything about the physical or empirical world, with many scientists and philosophers throughout history having very contrasting views. Throughout this essay I will lay down both arguments for and against the above statement and evaluate the outcome.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics